Search
Notices

Frontier Hiring.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2018, 02:37 PM
  #8761  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 68
Default

Seems like it's AQP....every 6 months now!!
CrewRest is offline  
Old 06-07-2018, 03:39 PM
  #8762  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: CRJ-200 CA
Posts: 434
Default

Originally Posted by CrewRest View Post
Seems like it's AQP....every 6 months now!!
FOs still go once a year... it’s just 2 days no matter what... I think aqp is 9 months for everyone
NWSteeringArmer is offline  
Old 06-07-2018, 05:06 PM
  #8763  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 251
Default

Originally Posted by NWSteeringArmer View Post
FOs still go once a year... it’s just 2 days no matter what... I think aqp is 9 months for everyone

AQP varies from airline to airline. At my previous job AQP was once a year for everyone, with two sim sessions on consecutive days. Sim 1 was maneuver validation, basically practicing lots of v1 cuts, and all kinds of ILS approaches with missed approaches and a landing here and there, stalls, and unusual attitude recoveries. Sim 2 was a LOFT and practicing a couple more things. It was a very neat program.
CGLimits is offline  
Old 06-07-2018, 06:17 PM
  #8764  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sab1250's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 187
Default

Aqp is worthless! Rolling PC/PT is way way more productive use of sim time! Unless you don’t care about improving as a pilot, and just want an easy checkride...then aqp is better...both Fo’s and Ca’s should go every 6 months though. I can agree with that at least.
sab1250 is offline  
Old 06-07-2018, 06:30 PM
  #8765  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyingR6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: F9 FO
Posts: 370
Default

Originally Posted by sab1250 View Post
Aqp is worthless! Rolling PC/PT is way way more productive use of sim time! Unless you don’t care about improving as a pilot, and just want an easy checkride...then aqp is better...both Fo’s and Ca’s should go every 6 months though. I can agree with that at least.
Not sure if serious..

If so, coal jobs are coming back and flip phones are the future of communications!

How about we practice the stuff we never do; stalls, steep turns, terrain avoidance, etc, and have jeopardy events on what we do every single day. F9 is in the stone age of reccurent training.
FlyingR6 is offline  
Old 06-07-2018, 07:09 PM
  #8766  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 300
Default

Originally Posted by sab1250 View Post
Aqp is worthless! Rolling PC/PT is way way more productive use of sim time! Unless you don’t care about improving as a pilot, and just want an easy checkride...then aqp is better...both Fo’s and Ca’s should go every 6 months though. I can agree with that at least.
“Our contract is actually pretty good and we’ll catch up after the NMB releases us. The gas station on our STL overnight has some great new sandwiches!”
ClearCreek is offline  
Old 06-07-2018, 07:15 PM
  #8767  
Gets Weekends Off
 
etflies's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: KCCO
Posts: 767
Default

Originally Posted by sab1250 View Post
Aqp is worthless! Rolling PC/PT is way way more productive use of sim time! Unless you don’t care about improving as a pilot, and just want an easy checkride...then aqp is better...both Fo’s and Ca’s should go every 6 months though. I can agree with that at least.
I’m not sure if you’re kidding or serious, but in my experience the only types I know of who think this way either have no experience with AQP or went through a poorly run/organized AQP program. AQP but is significantly better than the old school PC/PT format in just about every way.
etflies is offline  
Old 06-08-2018, 10:06 AM
  #8768  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sab1250's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 187
Default

I guess I went through a poorly run aqp program then. Mine was every 9 months both CAs and FOs went, 2 day event. Day one standard pc. Day 2 loft with a standard line turn with 1 or 2 problems...ie hydraulic failure or something similar...that’s it. Much less training then I have received at this airline and another that ran PC/PT. You can accomplish a LOT more in a proper PT in my experience, but like I said, maybe I’ve just never seen a proper AQP program.
sab1250 is offline  
Old 06-09-2018, 07:38 AM
  #8769  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 224
Default

Originally Posted by sab1250 View Post
Aqp is worthless! Rolling PC/PT is way way more productive use of sim time! Unless you don’t care about improving as a pilot, and just want an easy checkride...then aqp is better...both Fo’s and Ca’s should go every 6 months though. I can agree with that at least.

What are you talking about? More productive? AQP is basically train on the things you are weak on until you get it right. How could that not be more productive than doing 1 v1 cut "to standards" once in 6 or 12 months? Obviously other people have commented already but seriously....where were you?

In any event. The FAA had mandated all airlines to have an AQP program by 2018 I believe. However, with recent budget cuts that is no longer the case with the FAA. Hence, we move forward with what we have. AQP is too expensive to switch to in the short term which is why Indigo has not made the switch. Hopefully that means they are only around for the short term.
therapysession is offline  
Old 06-09-2018, 09:54 AM
  #8770  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sab1250's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 187
Default

Like I said before, in the aqp program I went through, you got 1 emergency or abnormal situation to handle during a turn an that’s it....pointless. In a proper PT you can practice all kinds of things, which is very productive. Maybe if we go AQP it will be different then my experience.
sab1250 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bucking Bar
Frontier
15
07-24-2011 07:07 PM
lolwut
Major
24
12-01-2010 03:21 AM
4 Fan Trashcan
Mergers and Acquisitions
7
01-28-2009 09:27 AM
Ak Pilot
Major
7
07-10-2008 09:30 AM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
3
09-29-2005 04:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices