GoJet hiring or just taking applications???
#61
First of all you are completely wrong because the actual gojet company is not the problem, the problem is the separate seniority list which was made as a result of poor TSA negotiations. Even TSA pilots would agree with that. I do agree it's VERY unfortunate but it was not as simple as you make it out to be, otherwise Gojet would still be a non union airline flying 66 seaters under Colgan or Mesa pay. Second of all it's not an alter ego if it was ALPA would have won in court and they wouldn't be sending their furloughed pilots to Gojet. 3rd you KEEP TALKING ABOUT THE PAST! We have or will never have anything to do with 2005. It's union with and industry average contract! What happened in 05 will certainly not be because of us or someone that will join in 2015. Meanwhile enjoy your RJs which you paid for rather than earning them, maybe we can all afford to outbid Skywest next time by buying UA outright.

The fact is negotiations broke down between TSA MEC and TSA management, so TSA management created Go Jet and a separate list to get around negotiating with the TSA MEC. That is a textbook example of an alter-ego airline. Hulas didn't want to pay TSA pilots more to fly a larger jet. That doesn't constitute "poor negotiations."
If your airline was so Kosher how come neither ALPA or the Teamsters 747 would represent you?
Your contract is not industry average and the fact that you are proud of that is embarrassing.
If by "earn our RJs" you mean have concessions beaten out of us by management then I'll have to pass. I'd rather let management pay for them out of their pockets.
No one is going to buy UA outright, they have a market cap of $1.14 billion. Buying enough stock to gain a controlling interest would drive up the price of the stock. No regional has that much money.
I guess you want to forget the past because you used to bash GoJet.
#62
First of all you are completely wrong because the actual gojet company is not the problem, the problem is the separate seniority list which was made as a result of poor TSA negotiations. Even TSA pilots would agree with that. I do agree it's VERY unfortunate but it was not as simple as you make it out to be, otherwise Gojet would still be a non union airline flying 66 seaters under Colgan or Mesa pay. Second of all it's not an alter ego if it was ALPA would have won in court and they wouldn't be sending their furloughed pilots to Gojet. 3rd you KEEP TALKING ABOUT THE PAST! We have or will never have anything to do with 2005. It's union with and industry average contract! What happened in 05 will certainly not be because of us or someone that will join in 2015. Meanwhile enjoy your RJs which you paid for rather than earning them, maybe we can all afford to outbid Skywest next time by buying UA outright.

I think by being financially RESPONSIBLE and using earned cash resources... that they earning the flying. If Gojet had the money, they would have done the same thing. Think outside of the box!!! Its called competitive advantage...
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: MD80
The fact is negotiations broke down between TSA MEC and TSA management, so TSA management created Go Jet and a separate list to get around negotiating with the TSA MEC. That is a textbook example of an alter-ego airline. Hulas didn't want to pay TSA pilots more to fly a larger jet. That doesn't constitute "poor negotiations."
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: 747 FO
All of it is factual information documented on both sides. I don't think there's much anyone can do to change history.
I certainly encourage to create a new thread about TSA and Eagle with documented evidence. I'm sure plenty of folks will be interested. I sense that a great deal of the animosity and defensive behavior comes from the guys that left Eagle to go to gojets in 05, and often find themselves justifying their actions.
Best of luck,
goaround
I certainly encourage to create a new thread about TSA and Eagle with documented evidence. I'm sure plenty of folks will be interested. I sense that a great deal of the animosity and defensive behavior comes from the guys that left Eagle to go to gojets in 05, and often find themselves justifying their actions.
Best of luck,
goaround
As for GJ's contract. Unless you're a GJ pilot (no, I'm not and never was) you have no justification to criticize it. Even if you are a GJ pilot, you have no justification to criticize unless you voted no. That goes for any other regional. All of you whining about pay; Remember, you chose to work for Brand X and unless you voted "no" on the contract vote immediately following your hire date, then you need to put a sock in it. There's a reason that it is called and "agreement".
Someone else said it and it bears repeating. There is no distinction between GJ pilots and any other regional pilots. If you think otherwise, you're just deluding yourselves....probably to make yourselves feel better for being King of the Crap.
Rant off.
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: 747 FO
The fact is negotiations broke down between TSA MEC and TSA management, so TSA management created Go Jet and a separate list to get around negotiating with the TSA MEC. That is a textbook example of an alter-ego airline. Hulas didn't want to pay TSA pilots more to fly a larger jet. That doesn't constitute "poor negotiations."
If your airline was so Kosher how come neither ALPA or the Teamsters 747 would represent you?
Come on! ALPA is bad enough. But 747? They're a joke.
Your contract is not industry average and the fact that you are proud of that is embarrassing.
BTW; Air Wisconsin's and Eagle's contracts are better....so I've heard. Then again, to each their own. You should take the same approach.
#66
wine...wine...moan...moan...complain...complain!! That's all most of you do anymore, trying to prove your point is correct while bashing someone else's. The day you all learn to work together is the day that you ACTUALLY HELP THE INDUSTRY. 5% of the crap you put on here is actually usable, so why not focus your time on something more useful. I'd rather listen to a debate about whether the McRib should be brought back or not then read this GoJet thing again. While this has a little to do with GoJet, it has everything to do with APC (especially the Regional threads.)
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
whine...whine...moan...moan...complain...complain!! That's all most of you do anymore, trying to prove your point is correct while bashing someone else's. The day you all learn to work together is the day that you ACTUALLY HELP THE INDUSTRY. 5% of the crap you put on here is actually usable, so why not focus your time on something more useful. I'd rather listen to a debate about whether the McRib should be brought back or not then read this GoJet thing again. While this has a little to do with GoJet, it has everything to do with APC (especially the Regional threads.)
Also, Zapata the difference between eagle/tsa and gojet/tsa is tsa wasn't created to go around eagle. That whole cluster stemmed from American buying TWA and TSA's long role as Trans World Express.... as for the planes that were borrowed from Eagle, they were returned when eagle could staff them at the expense of TSA furloughs.. so I'd say Eagle got it's justice there, is it hypocritical for TSA to seek similar justice against Gojet?
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: MD80
wine...wine...moan...moan...complain...complain!! That's all most of you do anymore, trying to prove your point is correct while bashing someone else's. The day you all learn to work together is the day that you ACTUALLY HELP THE INDUSTRY. 5% of the crap you put on here is actually usable, so why not focus your time on something more useful. I'd rather listen to a debate about whether the McRib should be brought back or not then read this GoJet thing again. While this has a little to do with GoJet, it has everything to do with APC (especially the Regional threads.)
#70
But that doesn't make any sense. Wouldn't 2005 TSA pilots have accepted the current pay and contract then? Why would an airline that was created to get around "paying" already low wages to pilots, form a union and an industry average contract? Wouldn't they continue to be non union with 50 seat wages since they already have thse "soft" and "understanding" pilots? You and I will never know what exactly went on at the negs and the time line required to finalize Gojet. And one thing's for sure the MEC did not see the seriousness of Gojet and the importance of securing CRJ700 flying. Granted no one can see the future and in 2005 50 seaters were still popular. They should have made like RAH which secured their E170 flying by agreeing to 37 dollar top out rates for 99 seaters. Look at where they are now.

GoJet not only allowed Hulas to pay less but it also allowed him to reset longevity as well. Finally instead of having one pilot group to deal with Hulas can now whipsaw TSA against Go Jet pilots. How is either group going to negotiate for better contracts when there is the whipsaw factor hanging overhead. Hulas also now knows that he can start another alter ego if he doesn't get what he wants from either TSA or Go Jet pilots. He got away with it once, he can/will try it again.
Now imagine what would have happened if you and others hadn't gone to Go Jet for the quick upgrade and instead stood behind the TSA pilots. Go Jet would still exist but there would be one seniority list and thus no chance for whipsaw. Everyone at TSH would have an easier time getting a better contract. Yeah it wouldn't fix the regionals but it would be a step in the right direction and that is all we can do, take small steps towards making things better.
Funny how you try and deflect attention to RAH. No one at RAH was hired knowing that they would be replacing Midwest pilots or flying 100 seat aircraft. Everyone hired at Go Jet knows that they are playing a roll in replacing another work group. If RAH was hiring right now or during the Midwest acquisition then those pilots would be guilty of replacing Midwest jobs.
OperatorError: Kind of hard to work together when we have Alter-ego airlines like Go Jet that undercut us. Some of us are actually trying to help the industry. If you don't want to read this than don't, problem solved.
Zapata: You bet there will be other things we'll be looking for to improve on our next contract and we'll compare ours to others and if there our better provisions in someone else's contract will work for that or something better.
ALPA is only as strong as it's local MEC. We finally had enough B.S. with our company and did the safety campaign, look how quickly that got us our new T.A.
If we don't compare contracts and discuss the good ones and the bad ones how is anyone supposed to get something better if we don't know what else is out there?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



