Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
ERAU trying to STOP the 1500hr requirement! >

ERAU trying to STOP the 1500hr requirement!

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

ERAU trying to STOP the 1500hr requirement!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2010, 10:37 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
I'm being a smart aleck with the CFI requirement and doing so for a reason.
Sorry then...I didn't realize that you were trying to make a point with the statement with the CFI required comment. I've seen that idea floated many times before on the boards and it usually comes from former CFIs. I thought you were agreeing with that line of thinking and I was attempting to show a different perspective.

Because the problem isn't a lack of pilot hours because again I'll say its ATPs that crash Part 121 airliners. How many hours does a USN pilot (or the more Chuck Norris like USMC pilot) have when they become carrier qualified?
I'm not sure what they have now, but there will be others that can answer that question. I had 440 hrs (due to some civilian time before the military) before I qual'ed in the T-2C. My roommate at the time, who had NO previous flight experience prior to FAM-1 in Primary qual'ed with about 150 hrs. Now after saying that, I'll also point out that those same students by the time they got to my phase of training after getting their wings (with about 200 hrs I think) still had a lot of problems with some basic skills - Basic Air Work and Situational Awareness most often. They would have NO place anywhere near a P121 (and certainly not a P135 single person cockpit) for that matter in my opinion.

The problem is a lack of standards in the FAA, OPs Specs and therein in the airlines when it comes to training, testing and evaluations.
Yes I believe the military trains to a very high standard - for a specific purpose.

I am a fan of the 1,500 hr rule for entrance into the P121 world. I have not really thought of the lowering of minimums for P135 VFR/IFR, but it is an interesting idea if it would not compromise the safety of those operations and still provide the needed experience for later entry into the airlines.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 04-01-2010, 10:42 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DeltaPaySoon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Stage Left
Posts: 366
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Bligh View Post

Doesn't UAL have tons of experience and statistical documentation on successful and safe low time pilot hiring/development/integration that should be able to flush this bill?
Even if they had the ability to resurrect the deceased, it wouldn't be enough this time around.
DeltaPaySoon is offline  
Old 04-02-2010, 03:12 AM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Furlough/Gun Driver
Posts: 437
Default

Originally Posted by Golden Bear View Post
Are you trying to compare the 300 hour hire with 400 hours line experience to the 1500 hour guy on day one? Sure the guy with more line experience will be better.

The more apt comparison is both pilots (300 hr vs. 1500 hr. hire), each after 400 hours line experience, or even better: which one is better prepared after 30 hours of OE, signed off and ready to fly the line?

I'd put my money on the 1500 hour guy.

P.S. I assume you mean Part "141" school, don't know many Part "121" flight schools out there.
Perhaps he was talking about the 121 regionals hiring lowtime pilots and then having them learn basic flying skills while flying the line.
dosbo is offline  
Old 04-02-2010, 04:22 AM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 41
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Bligh View Post
Just for conversation, lets assume 2 pilots. A 21 year old who gets hired at a jet regional with 300point1 hours and a multi rating vs. pilot #2, a 27 year old who worked in the same part 121 school he learned to fly at, building time until he reached 1500 hours.

I think that a few months later at 700 hours, the lower time pilot that had some exposure to working in the 121 environment (consider ground schools, in-doc and sim and IOE training) might be a better all around pilot after training and a few short months on the line, than the 1500 hour pilot who spent all of his time teaching at a 121 school under the supervision of a program manager that picks the days they can or cant fly due to weather. All this guy knows is the training environment.

What happened to all the discussion about a mentoring program?

Doesn't UAL have tons of experience and statistical documentation on successful and safe low time pilot hiring/development/integration that should be able to flush this bill?
The issue is not between the 300 hour pilot versus the 1500 hour pilot, but between a 21 year old versus a 27 year old.
gtech88 is offline  
Old 04-02-2010, 04:41 AM
  #35  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

The thing is that places like ERAU are shifting from Part 141 flight schools to Part 142 flight schools. What this means is even less time in the air and more time in a simulator.

Yep, simulators are great, but they do not simulate the experience of doing something stupid and surviving it. Simulators are a controlled environment whereas the real world is, well, real.

Ref Below:

FAR Part 141

Pilot School Requirements

This part prescribes the requirements issuing pilot school certificates and the general operating rules applicable to a holder of such a certificate.

For example:

Flight instructors must be certified under Part 141 to be able to teach students enrolled in such a course.

A FAR Part 141 pilot school can offer a private or commercial pilot course with less than the hours required under Part 61.

FAR Part 142

Aviation Training Centers

This part prescribes the rules governing the certification and operation of aviation training centers and provides an alternative means to accomplish training required for a pilot certificate.

For example:

Training accomplished in a course conducted by a training center certified under FAR Part 142 of this chapter using an approved flight simulator or approved flight training device (FTD) representing the category, class, and type, if applicable, of aircraft appropriate to the rating sought.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 04-02-2010, 04:43 AM
  #36  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Sorry then...I didn't realize that you were trying to make a point with the statement with the CFI required comment. I've seen that idea floated many times before on the boards and it usually comes from former CFIs. I thought you were agreeing with that line of thinking and I was attempting to show a different perspective.


USMCFLYR
Nah, I'm sorry USMC, I was being too much of a smart aleck.

Happens at 2am.

NO I do not believe the CFI or CFII should be a requirement.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 04-02-2010, 04:45 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left Out
Posts: 188
Default

Airline I work for has 300 hour pilots flying A330s and B777s and serve as Second Officers on A340s and B747s, and they do a fine job. They are all very very good at theory and procedures, with very little exposure (300 hours) to stick and rudder. It is the training program, along with the quality and drive of the student that determines the quality of the final product.

You are all fooling yourselves if you think that a 1500 hour rule is going to "raise the bar" as far as pay and work rules for regional pilots. The only thing that would accomplish that would be pilots actually looking out for the group as a whole instead of each individual looking out for himself.

FO
4everFO is offline  
Old 04-02-2010, 04:47 AM
  #38  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

ACL, I was talking to some folks that were looking at those Frasca FTD sims with the wrap around visuals for Auburn because the high cost of renting aircraft. The end result was the cost for some of those nice sims is very high per hour, not as high as an airplane, but not as cheap as we'd like to see.

Just too bad. If a school would eat the cost of the sim and make it dirt cheap for the students it'd be to the students educational benefit, imo. If they're not, then the students are paying a lot.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 04-02-2010, 04:57 AM
  #39  
Eats shoots and leaves...
 
bcrosier's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Didactic Synthetic Aviation Experience Provider
Posts: 849
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
So you should have your life threatened to validate your ability to fly 121?

To me that just validates an applicants inability to make wise choices. I've never had my life threatened, ended up just fine. Sure I had a few students here and there with issues... but we just climbed to a higher altitude and tried whateve it was we were doing again. Never applied to nor took a job flying questionable planes in questionable situations.
I never said you should have your life threatened. I did say you should work in an environment where you aren't spoon fed everything, where YOU are the one who has to make the hard decisions, and where you may make mistakes and learn from them WITHOUT having 50+ paying passengers in back who think they bought a ticket on a mainline flown by pilots with thousands of hours and years of experience.
bcrosier is offline  
Old 04-02-2010, 05:09 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,617
Default

Here's one question I'd like ERAU to answer:

In the country like the US where we have surplus of experienced pilots, why should the flying public accept lowering the safety margins by taking your graduates at bare mins when they could just as easily hire those with experience?

As a proud ERAU grad, I know I can build the best paper airplanes and I can tell you all about the high speed aluminum tubing. Yet, I can thank Ameriflight for really teaching me how to fly and be a pilot-in-command.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GOCKY
Cargo
3
03-21-2010 01:18 PM
Pharo351
Flight Schools and Training
7
10-02-2009 09:00 PM
Tegguy
Flight Schools and Training
25
09-12-2009 07:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices