ERAU trying to STOP the 1500hr requirement!
#31
Because the problem isn't a lack of pilot hours because again I'll say its ATPs that crash Part 121 airliners. How many hours does a USN pilot (or the more Chuck Norris like USMC pilot) have when they become carrier qualified?
The problem is a lack of standards in the FAA, OPs Specs and therein in the airlines when it comes to training, testing and evaluations.
I am a fan of the 1,500 hr rule for entrance into the P121 world. I have not really thought of the lowering of minimums for P135 VFR/IFR, but it is an interesting idea if it would not compromise the safety of those operations and still provide the needed experience for later entry into the airlines.
USMCFLYR
#32
Even if they had the ability to resurrect the deceased, it wouldn't be enough this time around.
#33
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Furlough/Gun Driver
Posts: 437
Are you trying to compare the 300 hour hire with 400 hours line experience to the 1500 hour guy on day one? Sure the guy with more line experience will be better.
The more apt comparison is both pilots (300 hr vs. 1500 hr. hire), each after 400 hours line experience, or even better: which one is better prepared after 30 hours of OE, signed off and ready to fly the line?
I'd put my money on the 1500 hour guy.
P.S. I assume you mean Part "141" school, don't know many Part "121" flight schools out there.
The more apt comparison is both pilots (300 hr vs. 1500 hr. hire), each after 400 hours line experience, or even better: which one is better prepared after 30 hours of OE, signed off and ready to fly the line?
I'd put my money on the 1500 hour guy.
P.S. I assume you mean Part "141" school, don't know many Part "121" flight schools out there.
#34
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 41
Just for conversation, lets assume 2 pilots. A 21 year old who gets hired at a jet regional with 300point1 hours and a multi rating vs. pilot #2, a 27 year old who worked in the same part 121 school he learned to fly at, building time until he reached 1500 hours.
I think that a few months later at 700 hours, the lower time pilot that had some exposure to working in the 121 environment (consider ground schools, in-doc and sim and IOE training) might be a better all around pilot after training and a few short months on the line, than the 1500 hour pilot who spent all of his time teaching at a 121 school under the supervision of a program manager that picks the days they can or cant fly due to weather. All this guy knows is the training environment.
What happened to all the discussion about a mentoring program?
Doesn't UAL have tons of experience and statistical documentation on successful and safe low time pilot hiring/development/integration that should be able to flush this bill?
I think that a few months later at 700 hours, the lower time pilot that had some exposure to working in the 121 environment (consider ground schools, in-doc and sim and IOE training) might be a better all around pilot after training and a few short months on the line, than the 1500 hour pilot who spent all of his time teaching at a 121 school under the supervision of a program manager that picks the days they can or cant fly due to weather. All this guy knows is the training environment.
What happened to all the discussion about a mentoring program?
Doesn't UAL have tons of experience and statistical documentation on successful and safe low time pilot hiring/development/integration that should be able to flush this bill?
#35
The thing is that places like ERAU are shifting from Part 141 flight schools to Part 142 flight schools. What this means is even less time in the air and more time in a simulator.
Yep, simulators are great, but they do not simulate the experience of doing something stupid and surviving it. Simulators are a controlled environment whereas the real world is, well, real.
Ref Below:
FAR Part 141
Pilot School Requirements
This part prescribes the requirements issuing pilot school certificates and the general operating rules applicable to a holder of such a certificate.
For example:
Flight instructors must be certified under Part 141 to be able to teach students enrolled in such a course.
A FAR Part 141 pilot school can offer a private or commercial pilot course with less than the hours required under Part 61.
FAR Part 142
Aviation Training Centers
This part prescribes the rules governing the certification and operation of aviation training centers and provides an alternative means to accomplish training required for a pilot certificate.
For example:
Training accomplished in a course conducted by a training center certified under FAR Part 142 of this chapter using an approved flight simulator or approved flight training device (FTD) representing the category, class, and type, if applicable, of aircraft appropriate to the rating sought.
Yep, simulators are great, but they do not simulate the experience of doing something stupid and surviving it. Simulators are a controlled environment whereas the real world is, well, real.
Ref Below:
FAR Part 141
Pilot School Requirements
This part prescribes the requirements issuing pilot school certificates and the general operating rules applicable to a holder of such a certificate.
For example:
Flight instructors must be certified under Part 141 to be able to teach students enrolled in such a course.
A FAR Part 141 pilot school can offer a private or commercial pilot course with less than the hours required under Part 61.
FAR Part 142
Aviation Training Centers
This part prescribes the rules governing the certification and operation of aviation training centers and provides an alternative means to accomplish training required for a pilot certificate.
For example:
Training accomplished in a course conducted by a training center certified under FAR Part 142 of this chapter using an approved flight simulator or approved flight training device (FTD) representing the category, class, and type, if applicable, of aircraft appropriate to the rating sought.
#36
Sorry then...I didn't realize that you were trying to make a point with the statement with the CFI required comment. I've seen that idea floated many times before on the boards and it usually comes from former CFIs. I thought you were agreeing with that line of thinking and I was attempting to show a different perspective.
USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR
Happens at 2am.
NO I do not believe the CFI or CFII should be a requirement.
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left Out
Posts: 188
Airline I work for has 300 hour pilots flying A330s and B777s and serve as Second Officers on A340s and B747s, and they do a fine job. They are all very very good at theory and procedures, with very little exposure (300 hours) to stick and rudder. It is the training program, along with the quality and drive of the student that determines the quality of the final product.
You are all fooling yourselves if you think that a 1500 hour rule is going to "raise the bar" as far as pay and work rules for regional pilots. The only thing that would accomplish that would be pilots actually looking out for the group as a whole instead of each individual looking out for himself.
FO
You are all fooling yourselves if you think that a 1500 hour rule is going to "raise the bar" as far as pay and work rules for regional pilots. The only thing that would accomplish that would be pilots actually looking out for the group as a whole instead of each individual looking out for himself.
FO
#38
ACL, I was talking to some folks that were looking at those Frasca FTD sims with the wrap around visuals for Auburn because the high cost of renting aircraft. The end result was the cost for some of those nice sims is very high per hour, not as high as an airplane, but not as cheap as we'd like to see.
Just too bad. If a school would eat the cost of the sim and make it dirt cheap for the students it'd be to the students educational benefit, imo. If they're not, then the students are paying a lot.
Just too bad. If a school would eat the cost of the sim and make it dirt cheap for the students it'd be to the students educational benefit, imo. If they're not, then the students are paying a lot.
#39
Eats shoots and leaves...
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Didactic Synthetic Aviation Experience Provider
Posts: 849
So you should have your life threatened to validate your ability to fly 121?
To me that just validates an applicants inability to make wise choices. I've never had my life threatened, ended up just fine. Sure I had a few students here and there with issues... but we just climbed to a higher altitude and tried whateve it was we were doing again. Never applied to nor took a job flying questionable planes in questionable situations.
To me that just validates an applicants inability to make wise choices. I've never had my life threatened, ended up just fine. Sure I had a few students here and there with issues... but we just climbed to a higher altitude and tried whateve it was we were doing again. Never applied to nor took a job flying questionable planes in questionable situations.
#40
Gets Weekend Reserve
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,617
Here's one question I'd like ERAU to answer:
In the country like the US where we have surplus of experienced pilots, why should the flying public accept lowering the safety margins by taking your graduates at bare mins when they could just as easily hire those with experience?
As a proud ERAU grad, I know I can build the best paper airplanes and I can tell you all about the high speed aluminum tubing. Yet, I can thank Ameriflight for really teaching me how to fly and be a pilot-in-command.
In the country like the US where we have surplus of experienced pilots, why should the flying public accept lowering the safety margins by taking your graduates at bare mins when they could just as easily hire those with experience?
As a proud ERAU grad, I know I can build the best paper airplanes and I can tell you all about the high speed aluminum tubing. Yet, I can thank Ameriflight for really teaching me how to fly and be a pilot-in-command.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post