JamesNoBrakes

Awesome, you say you are eagerly awaiting the science, but then you've already made up your mind that you won't accept it.

The Flat Earth Society

jungle

I fully accept the science. The science tells us most climate change happened long before man was a factor.

Science does not prove that man is currently to blame for climate change. MMGW is a theory, and the models predicting climate based on man made CO2 have been proven incorrect.

Climate change is real, the vast majority of it is the result of natural cycles. Do you think the known historic record proves otherwise?

Flat Earth indeed.

Isn't it a little naive to think the last 15,000 years of warming were man made? What caused the ice sheet to recede? What caused it to form and recede during multiple ice ages? Do you think the cosmos changes?

You have clearly made up your mind absent many scientific facts, this means you have ignored science.

N2264J

I don't know what you'd call them and I don't care. It's irrelevant.

What I know for sure is that if you believe:

- the earth is 6,000 years old, you're a crank
- evolution is a secular myth, you're a crank
- the sun revolves around the earth, you're a crank
- bleeding someone can cure them of tuberculosis, you're a crank and a quack
- the moon landing was filmed on a sound stage in New Mexico, you're a crank.

And if you believe in 2012 that anthropogenic global warming is junk science, a conspiracy and a hoax, the jury is in and the verdict: crank.

.

DYNASTY HVY

I don't beleive there is an optimal temp.due to the complexity involved or they would have nailed it down by now .
Just another grasping at straws actually.

Ally

N2264J

Why should I continue to waste my time?

I've made dozens of contributions already with reference materials you didn't read before declaring it tripe and then respond by floating something from the Heartland Institute, the WattsUpWithThat blog or some such organization that's usually funded
by Exxon or the Koch brothers.

And I would guess that you don't know who Smedley Butler was either or you
wouldn't be putting him out there as a hero of yours while you shill for the same huge corporations he despised so much.

Irony is my favorite form of comedy and I suspect the irony of your position hasn't revealed itself to you yet.

jungle

N2264J, I love it when you rant, it means you really have nothing left.

TPTB may not love us, but they still can't control the cosmos.

Speaking of irony, could you refresh our memory-who controls those corporations and is charged with regulating them, who declares war? Looks like you have only considered half the problem, Smedley didn't mention it because he was running for the senate at the time.

I won't call you a crank, just a tool of TPTB, tilting at cosmic windmills.

My suggestion is that you stop generating CO2 if you think it is a problem.

Lastly, I must mention your hating of Exxon is just too funny. Just don't buy their products-nobody is forcing you to do so.
Do you know who makes three times what Exxon does on every gallon of gas sold?

So, when you finish your rant, show us some science. We all understand that science can't change the past and it does not really care about your ideology.

FDXLAG

All accept the moon landing were at the time considered the settled science (usually by fiat of government supported "scientists") and used by the elites to advance their power. But I guess that irony is lost on you.

Come to think of it your North Korean brethren still deny the US moon Landings.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-16252540

tomgoodman

AGW is a conspiracy all right, but TPTB ain't who they appear to be.
Hint: think "cold-blooded" and "terraforming".

jungle

My sources with the cold-blooded tell me they get a huge chuckle from children stamping their feet and having a tantrum because the climate cannot be controlled.

In some arenas debate is strictly prohibited because it tends to bring important facts to light: http://www.climatedepot.com/a/18726/...UN-credentials

DYNASTY HVY

"We do not have any scientific proof that we are the cause of the global warming that has occurred in the last 200 years...The alarmism is driving us through scare tactics to adopt energy policies that are going to create a huge amount of energy poverty among the poor people. It's not good for people and its not good for the environment...In a warmer world we can produce more food."

Dr.Patrick Moore

So how is this problem with the poor going to be addressed?
I have one little question and that is this -
Anyone besides myself have a clue as to where political correctness originated ?


Ally