Search

Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Tool of the day

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2014 | 06:51 PM
  #4731  
FlyBoyd's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: FDX 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by e6bpilot
Holy crap! Our APU burns 600# per hour! We do have some pretty sky high power requirements that the generator has to meet, but still, it seems excessive compared to the low numbers you just posted.
The actual number is 200#. The rest is overage and is funneled to cover cost of Area 51.
Reply
Old 01-07-2014 | 08:28 PM
  #4732  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 7
From: B767
Default

Originally Posted by Elmer Fudd
I guess you need to know the guy.....he used to be a Check Airman. Most pilots hold those guys to a higher standard. He gave me OE on another aircraft, and was worthless. Lack of standardization, attention to detail, etc.

Last month, he gave me an aircraft with a huge maintenance issue, only to say that it's my problem. He was going to the hotel.

The same behavior pattern seems to be in play here.
Ah, I stand corrected!
Reply
Old 01-07-2014 | 10:09 PM
  #4733  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
Tool of the day: The pilot that turns it on when the FA asks, knowing the costs, system wear, and that it deviates from your standard procedures.
You'd be astonished at how many pilots just turn it on to shut them up.
Reply
Old 01-07-2014 | 10:37 PM
  #4734  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
You'd be astonished at how many pilots just turn it on to shut them up.
I usually take the "in a minute!" approach.

I hate doing a walkaround with the APU on unless absolutely necessary.
Reply
Old 01-07-2014 | 10:55 PM
  #4735  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by mike734
You're right. For an NG with an Allied Signal 131-9 APU the burn is:

No packs 180 PPH
One Pack 240 PPH
Two Pack 204 PPH

STILL 3000 # for an evening seems a bit high.
Uhhh, silly me..........just gonna ask, how does a one pack operation use more gas than two pack operation?

Denny
Reply
Old 01-07-2014 | 11:24 PM
  #4736  
mike734's Avatar
New boss = Old boss
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 1
From: Ca B737
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
Uhhh, silly me..........just gonna ask, how does a one pack operation use more gas than two pack operation?

Denny
I know. Not intuitive but true. Here is the paragraph from the 737 Technical site that explains it.

"A single pack must work harder than two packs to cool the cabin to a given temperature. Hence the APU must supply higher bleed air pressures to assure proper environmental control system operation. This higher pressure requires a greater Inlet Guide Vane (IGV) open position than that required for 2–pack operation. Since there is less airflow required to operate 1–pack than is needed, a significant amount of unused bleed air is exhausted through the Surge Control Valve (SCV). This higher IGV open position and large quantity of unused air translates into higher APU fuel burn and higher EGTs during 1–pack operation. Also, the high airflow levels exhausting through the surge control valve increases the overall APU generated noise by 2dbA. With 2 packs supplying the cabin cooling requirements the pressure requirement is lower, resulting in lower turbine inlet temperatures, EGTs and far less unused air being discharged through the surge valve."
Reply
Old 01-07-2014 | 11:38 PM
  #4737  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by mike734
I know. Not intuitive but true. Here is the paragraph from the 737 Technical site that explains it.

"A single pack must work harder than two packs to cool the cabin to a given temperature. Hence the APU must supply higher bleed air pressures to assure proper environmental control system operation. This higher pressure requires a greater Inlet Guide Vane (IGV) open position than that required for 2–pack operation. Since there is less airflow required to operate 1–pack than is needed, a significant amount of unused bleed air is exhausted through the Surge Control Valve (SCV). This higher IGV open position and large quantity of unused air translates into higher APU fuel burn and higher EGTs during 1–pack operation. Also, the high airflow levels exhausting through the surge control valve increases the overall APU generated noise by 2dbA. With 2 packs supplying the cabin cooling requirements the pressure requirement is lower, resulting in lower turbine inlet temperatures, EGTs and far less unused air being discharged through the surge valve."
Learn something new everyday. Glad I didn't go with my first thought!

Denny
Reply
Old 01-07-2014 | 11:57 PM
  #4738  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by mike734
I know. Not intuitive but true. Here is the paragraph from the 737 Technical site that explains it.

"A single pack must work harder than two packs to cool the cabin to a given temperature. Hence the APU must supply higher bleed air pressures to assure proper environmental control system operation. This higher pressure requires a greater Inlet Guide Vane (IGV) open position than that required for 2–pack operation. Since there is less airflow required to operate 1–pack than is needed, a significant amount of unused bleed air is exhausted through the Surge Control Valve (SCV). This higher IGV open position and large quantity of unused air translates into higher APU fuel burn and higher EGTs during 1–pack operation. Also, the high airflow levels exhausting through the surge control valve increases the overall APU generated noise by 2dbA. With 2 packs supplying the cabin cooling requirements the pressure requirement is lower, resulting in lower turbine inlet temperatures, EGTs and far less unused air being discharged through the surge valve."
Have I mentioned how much I hate the 737? Give me a 757 or 320 any day of the week, please!
Reply
Old 01-08-2014 | 04:45 AM
  #4739  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,590
Likes: 434
Default

Originally Posted by FlyBoyd
The actual number is 200#. The rest is overage and is funneled to cover cost of Area 51.
Someone has to pay for it. Sorry, taxpayers.
Reply
Old 01-08-2014 | 05:26 AM
  #4740  
Dirtdiver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: 767A
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
Tool of the day: The pilot that turns it on when the FA asks, knowing the costs, system wear, and that it deviates from your standard procedures.
Not always FAs. 1 hour+ to push, 40 degrees F outside, sun shining on him so he's a little warm. Cranks the APU. I shut it down, told him to crack his window.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elvis90
Military
2
11-11-2010 09:25 AM
meloveboeing
Regional
5
10-02-2010 07:47 AM
kc135driver
United
122
08-24-2010 08:30 AM
exerauflyboy5
Flight Schools and Training
15
02-18-2009 08:29 PM
Busdriver
JetBlue
70
01-16-2006 10:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices