The TA is finally here
#321
My number one concern in the surveys was scope and QOL. It was not pay rates. The C-series rates seem low to me but have any of your seen that plane? I haven't. By the time management actually gets off their A$$ and makes a decision, it will be years into this contract before they even come close to replacing 320s. By then, we will be in section 6 again. Where I feel this TA missed the mark is insurance. I am scratching my head at the small gains with insurance. I am glad I have a few weeks to decide yes or no. I am sure I could add some more work rules if I go back and read this TA again.
#322
Line Holder
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
We have rates for both in the TA, but will we end up buying both models? I think they just wanted to get rates for both to shore up their cost analysis vs. E2.
#323
Covfefe
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
Great things? I think of our proposed rigs/ADG more as an industry standard thing that we don’t currently have and that is a nonstarter to not have. Not in the category of “great things.” They are good, average, necessary for this TA to pass...not great. Great would be ADG if 6, or min day guarantee of 5...but that isn’t expected and probably wouldn’t happen bc it isn’t industry standard.
#324
Banned
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
I don't know if it blows us away but there are some great things in the work rules. Average duty time and day rigs are HUGE for our trips. Watch the video. No more 10 hour 3 days. No more 17-19 hour four days. International override will certainly add up, and night override will help, and me personally I thought Emergency/extension past the OFP would have been history at this place. Who has that? Its still here and its 200%. More than 2 hours and its 5 hours at 200%. I don't sell PTO regularly, so that does not affect me. The scope language is strong, but that is a different section and different thread...
My number one concern in the surveys was scope and QOL. It was not pay rates. The C-series rates seem low to me but have any of your seen that plane? I haven't. By the time management actually gets off their A$$ and makes a decision, it will be years into this contract before they even come close to replacing 320s. By then, we will be in section 6 again. Where I feel this TA missed the mark is insurance. I am scratching my head at the small gains with insurance. I am glad I have a few weeks to decide yes or no. I am sure I could add some more work rules if I go back and read this TA again.
My number one concern in the surveys was scope and QOL. It was not pay rates. The C-series rates seem low to me but have any of your seen that plane? I haven't. By the time management actually gets off their A$$ and makes a decision, it will be years into this contract before they even come close to replacing 320s. By then, we will be in section 6 again. Where I feel this TA missed the mark is insurance. I am scratching my head at the small gains with insurance. I am glad I have a few weeks to decide yes or no. I am sure I could add some more work rules if I go back and read this TA again.
#325
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 0
From: Left
I don't know if it blows us away but there are some great things in the work rules. Average duty time and day rigs are HUGE for our trips. Watch the video. No more 10 hour 3 days. No more 17-19 hour four days. International override will certainly add up, and night override will help, and me personally I thought Emergency/extension past the OFP would have been history at this place. Who has that? Its still here and its 200%. More than 2 hours and its 5 hours at 200%. I don't sell PTO regularly, so that does not affect me. The scope language is strong, but that is a different section and different thread...
My number one concern in the surveys was scope and QOL. It was not pay rates. The C-series rates seem low to me but have any of your seen that plane? I haven't. By the time management actually gets off their A$$ and makes a decision, it will be years into this contract before they even come close to replacing 320s. By then, we will be in section 6 again. Where I feel this TA missed the mark is insurance. I am scratching my head at the small gains with insurance. I am glad I have a few weeks to decide yes or no. I am sure I could add some more work rules if I go back and read this TA again.
My number one concern in the surveys was scope and QOL. It was not pay rates. The C-series rates seem low to me but have any of your seen that plane? I haven't. By the time management actually gets off their A$$ and makes a decision, it will be years into this contract before they even come close to replacing 320s. By then, we will be in section 6 again. Where I feel this TA missed the mark is insurance. I am scratching my head at the small gains with insurance. I am glad I have a few weeks to decide yes or no. I am sure I could add some more work rules if I go back and read this TA again.
You haven’t seen the CSeries yet? Here’s a decent look at an Air Baltic CS300 - they have just added 60 orders for it on top of an existing order for 20 CS300s (they are big fans of the airplane):
http://www.worldairroutes.com/airbalticcs300.html
#326
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 535
Likes: 1
We all need to start using reference #s when statements like that are made.
25.R ( reserve).7.m : airport reserve is prohibited.
Maybe you found a loop hole or I just watch too much Different Strokes?
Or maybe you're not talking about reserve?
#327
READ... 25- 7.d. and 25- 7.m.
#328
You haven’t seen the CSeries yet? Here’s a decent look at an Air Baltic CS300 - they have just added 60 orders for it on top of an existing order for 20 CS300s (they are big fans of the airplane):
airbalticcs300
airbalticcs300
#329
Great things? I think of our proposed rigs/ADG more as an industry standard thing that we don’t currently have and that is a nonstarter to not have. Not in the category of “great things.” They are good, average, necessary for this TA to pass...not great. Great would be ADG if 6, or min day guarantee of 5...but that isn’t expected and probably wouldn’t happen bc it isn’t industry standard.
#330
Banned
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
You from Russia? Or, what you talking about Willis?
We all need to start using reference #s when statements like that are made.
25.R ( reserve).7.m : airport reserve is prohibited.
Maybe you found a loop hole or I just watch too much Different Strokes?
Or maybe you're not talking about reserve?
We all need to start using reference #s when statements like that are made.
25.R ( reserve).7.m : airport reserve is prohibited.
Maybe you found a loop hole or I just watch too much Different Strokes?
Or maybe you're not talking about reserve?Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



