Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
jetBlue rape lawsuit, filed 3/18/19 >

jetBlue rape lawsuit, filed 3/18/19

Search
Notices

jetBlue rape lawsuit, filed 3/18/19

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2019, 10:01 AM
  #61  
Covfefe
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Default

Originally Posted by Busdriver4369 View Post
Silly me, I misread. He only "assaulted and battered Plaintiff DOE # 2 and drugged her, with the intent of sexually assaulting and raping her" but later left. My bad!
Hope you follow up with your post when the facts come out. I’ll give you a hint. This is a civil suit. Not a criminal suit. No criminal charges were filed. An investigation already happened. And at least one of the FAs were fired for getting caught in lies about it.

I’ll just paint a picture for you. 3 FAs allegedly get drugged and raped. They wake up on time, hit the crew van, go do all their preflight stuff, and think they are good to work the flight after being that out of it from these date rape drugs. Then they decide to go get checked out only after they get off work instead of right after it happened.

How about this scenario: they got in trouble for being hungover/drunk while working a flight they shouldn’t have been working, and out of self-preservation came up with a new version of how the events unfolded. Is that possible? Or should we crucify the pilots on the internet and in the media based on some unsubstantiated lawsuit before any facts have come out?

There’s a reason there are no criminal charges. There’s a reason the pilots got investigated and cleared by a company that is very HR and lawyer driven, yet the “victims” got caught up in lies. Were any date rape drugs found in their system? A civil suit seeking only monetary compensation needing 51% of the jurors in a #MeToo era....this is a money grab for at least one unemployed former FA who got caught making bad choices and lying about it.
BeatNavy is offline  
Old 03-22-2019, 10:21 AM
  #62  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
Hope you follow up with your post when the facts come out. I’ll give you a hint. This is a civil suit. Not a criminal suit. No criminal charges were filed. An investigation already happened. And at least one of the FAs were fired for getting caught in lies about it.

I’ll just paint a picture for you. 3 FAs allegedly get drugged and raped. They wake up on time, hit the crew van, go do all their preflight stuff, and think they are good to work the flight after being that out of it from these date rape drugs. Then they decide to go get checked out only after they get off work instead of right after it happened.

How about this scenario: they got in trouble for being hungover/drunk while working a flight they shouldn’t have been working, and out of self-preservation came up with a new version of how the events unfolded. Is that possible? Or should we crucify the pilots on the internet and in the media based on some unsubstantiated lawsuit before any facts have come out?

There’s a reason there are no criminal charges. There’s a reason the pilots got investigated and cleared by a company that is very HR and lawyer driven, yet the “victims” got caught up in lies. Were any date rape drugs found in their system? A civil suit seeking only monetary compensation needing 51% of the jurors in a #MeToo era....this is a money grab for at least one unemployed former FA who got caught making bad choices and lying about it.
The only thing the Captain did was have beers on the beach as far as I can tell. They all agree he wasn't present for the "assault". Even IF the beer was drugged it doesn't appear that he knew about it.

Just think about this, I am going to rufee someone. Why would I pick 3 women who know each other, work with me, and know my name? Wouldn't I just drug a stranger? The whole thing just smells funny to me. Could it be true? Sure. There seems to be zero evidence except these women with monetary motives who were already caught lying about it.

Also, do this CA and FO hang out socially outside of work? If not what are the odds the CA was involved even IF it were true. If the FAs get caught lying I would be suing them for defamation.
PasserOGas is offline  
Old 03-22-2019, 11:01 AM
  #63  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
Hope you follow up with your post when the facts come out. I’ll give you a hint. This is a civil suit. Not a criminal suit. No criminal charges were filed. An investigation already happened. And at least one of the FAs were fired for getting caught in lies about it.

I’ll just paint a picture for you. 3 FAs allegedly get drugged and raped. They wake up on time, hit the crew van, go do all their preflight stuff, and think they are good to work the flight after being that out of it from these date rape drugs. Then they decide to go get checked out only after they get off work instead of right after it happened.

How about this scenario: they got in trouble for being hungover/drunk while working a flight they shouldn’t have been working, and out of self-preservation came up with a new version of how the events unfolded. Is that possible? Or should we crucify the pilots on the internet and in the media based on some unsubstantiated lawsuit before any facts have come out?

There’s a reason there are no criminal charges. There’s a reason the pilots got investigated and cleared by a company that is very HR and lawyer driven, yet the “victims” got caught up in lies. Were any date rape drugs found in their system? A civil suit seeking only monetary compensation needing 51% of the jurors in a #MeToo era....this is a money grab for at least one unemployed former FA who got caught making bad choices and lying about it.
Usually you need 9/3 majority to win or else they declare mistrial. Or they have to lose 9/3 to not be able to sue again.
hilltopflyer is offline  
Old 03-22-2019, 11:51 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Default

Originally Posted by Busdriver4369 View Post
Silly me, I misread. He only "assaulted and battered Plaintiff DOE # 2 and drugged her, with the intent of sexually assaulting and raping her" but later left. My bad!
Not sure how long you’ve been in aviation (or life, for that matter), but...

Does it make sense for the FAs to have been allegedly drugged and raped, then they go to work the next day as if nothing happened, on the same plane with the same alleged rapists?

NO. No way in hell, in fact.

They would have called the company, refused to fly with the SOBs who did this to them, and it would have created quite the scene overall, with the pilots being pulled off the flight and investigated.

But instead, they worked the flight, and told someone about it later? Does this pass the common sense test with you in any way?
HighFlight is offline  
Old 03-22-2019, 01:20 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 132
Default

Originally Posted by HighFlight View Post
Not sure how long you’ve been in aviation (or life, for that matter), but...

Does it make sense for the FAs to have been allegedly drugged and raped, then they go to work the next day as if nothing happened, on the same plane with the same alleged rapists?

NO. No way in hell, in fact.

They would have called the company, refused to fly with the SOBs who did this to them, and it would have created quite the scene overall, with the pilots being pulled off the flight and investigated.

But instead, they worked the flight, and told someone about it later? Does this pass the common sense test with you in any way?
What makes you think they were working together?
b82rez is offline  
Old 03-22-2019, 01:44 PM
  #66  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Default

Originally Posted by b82rez View Post
What makes you think they were working together?
Why do you think they aren’t?
hilltopflyer is offline  
Old 03-22-2019, 01:55 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Default

Originally Posted by b82rez View Post
What makes you think they were working together?
They may or may not have been on the same plane together, sorry for projecting that they were.

Either way, would YOU get on a plane and just work after being “raped”? I know i wouldn’t. I also would not have waited until arriving back home to tell someone about it.
HighFlight is offline  
Old 03-22-2019, 02:26 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GuppyPuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: JetRight, JetLeft
Posts: 760
Default

Lies.

Gup
GuppyPuppy is offline  
Old 03-22-2019, 03:10 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 161
Default

Originally Posted by HighFlight View Post
Not sure how long you’ve been in aviation (or life, for that matter), but...

Does it make sense for the FAs to have been allegedly drugged and raped, then they go to work the next day as if nothing happened, on the same plane with the same alleged rapists?

NO. No way in hell, in fact.

They would have called the company, refused to fly with the SOBs who did this to them, and it would have created quite the scene overall, with the pilots being pulled off the flight and investigated.

But instead, they worked the flight, and told someone about it later? Does this pass the common sense test with you in any way?
I have no idea about the details of this case, and have no opinion one way or the other, but you do seem to have quite strong opinions on how a rape victim in general "should" act. You do realize that the vast majority (85%+) know their attacker, most (2/3+) don't report the assault, only roughly half (46%) of the rapes that are reported are reported the same day, a third wait at least six months. Many continue to interact with their attacker on a regular basis. I didn't pull any of this out of my rear, it's fairly easy to find.

But please, do go on telling rape victims how they should act with common sense when they're raped, common sense being it fits with your iron clad opinion of the way a text book rape happens and how the victim should react properly.
Brillo is online now  
Old 03-22-2019, 03:28 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
Default

Sorry for my previous thread drift. Background - masters in psych and I did some of my undergrad and some grad hours of my practicum hours working in sex therapy. No joke. Spent time in prisons, with sex offenders, pedophiles, swingers, fetishish obsessed, self mutilators, and the like. Buy me a beer on the overnight and I’ll tell you some stories. Some things don’t pass the muster. STD but only passed to one victim? HPV is a virus. Most certainly transmitted with contact. I also had to attend court and depositions. This doesn’t fit the smell test with me. WTF is a pilot doing with a psych background? I got my CFII and ATP before going to college so at age 23 I went into a PSY program and flight instructed my way through school. A family member of mine was a victim of sexual assault. Not denying the alleged victim here but it doesn't fit the profile.
Std Deviation is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jetliner1526
JetBlue
290
08-09-2018 08:52 AM
ERJ135
Major
95
02-05-2018 09:14 AM
Bluedriver
JetBlue
310
05-20-2017 03:53 PM
PasserOGas
Major
120
11-26-2015 05:12 AM
CRJAV8OR
Major
36
03-27-2012 11:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices