Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
JetBlue Latest and Greatest >

JetBlue Latest and Greatest

Search

Notices

JetBlue Latest and Greatest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2025 | 11:00 AM
  #13871  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
I’m not saying we have a ton of leverage or anything, but I’m also not saying we should b doing it for free either. We shouldn’t even have these. This was a Covid thing. We got guys out here publicly going against the union when the company continually shows bad faith in just about everything they do. SMH.
What if doing VILs is keeping JB pilots off the street? Does the benefit have to touch every seniority or is saving jobs and keeping stone employed a good enough reason to agree to VILs.

And what exactly are you proposing we “gain” in exchange for agreeing to VILs? FLICA waiting room? Not everything the union does is a good thing. It’s okay to think independently for yourself.
Reply
Old 05-10-2025 | 11:06 AM
  #13872  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by MergingTargets
Careful with that line of thinking. Soon you’ll be up at night worrying about how many of your coworkers might pee in your coffee if given the chance… or fart on your seat when you’re taking a break or something.
You’re definitely sus MT 😂
Reply
Old 05-10-2025 | 11:32 AM
  #13873  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
What if doing VILs is keeping JB pilots off the street? Does the benefit have to touch every seniority or is saving jobs and keeping stone employed a good enough reason to agree to VILs.

And what exactly are you proposing we “gain” in exchange for agreeing to VILs? FLICA waiting room? Not everything the union does is a good thing. It’s okay to think independently for yourself.
VIL’s aren’t keeping new hire FO’s off the street. We’re overstaffed on Captains, but that should correct itself as we take more 220’s and have less 321’s sitting for Pratt issues. I’ve been hypercritical of the union in many areas…that just isn’t one of them. And this sure as sh!t isn’t the venue to question them.
Reply
Old 05-10-2025 | 11:45 AM
  #13874  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
VIL’s aren’t keeping new hire FO’s off the street. We’re overstaffed on Captains, but that should correct itself as we take more 220’s and have less 321’s sitting for Pratt issues. I’ve been hypercritical of the union in many areas…that just isn’t one of them. And this sure as sh!t isn’t the venue to question them.
We’re overstaffed overall, not just with CAs. The displacement bid is correcting the CA over staffing and loss of the 190. Even with that we are overstaffed for our current flying we’re doing. Either way I don’t see taking a hard stand on VILs as being productive or leading to anything meaningful for the pilot group. Quite possibly the exact opposite. We shall see. Moving on.
Reply
Old 05-11-2025 | 04:53 AM
  #13875  
Bluediver the REAL deal
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 575
Likes: 29
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
We’re overstaffed overall,
We are always over staffed or understaffed. There has never been an equilibrium. We are either burned out or begging for hours. That isn’t “The nature of the business”. That’s **** poor planning being implemented in a “contrarian” way. VIL Subjugates seniority plain and simple and $hit rolls downhill. It doesn’t lead to having a weekend or more days off. We just get less productive trips that are un commutable because “They need to use us.” There is absolutely no difference between paying two guys 70 or one guy 85 and one 55. Just because one guy sits at home doesn’t mean the other wants to work 85. Without VIL there is a chance that those who get LCR may not be called or escalated as much. Theoretically the grids should be closer to green allowing drops and swap more often and maybe, possibly on a weekend dare I say. Thats a win for a lot more then the few who bid and awarded these damn VIL’s
Reply
Old 05-11-2025 | 05:07 AM
  #13876  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,051
Likes: 33
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Bluediver
We are always over staffed or understaffed. There has never been an equilibrium. We are either burned out or begging for hours. That isn’t “The nature of the business”. That’s **** poor planning being implemented in a “contrarian” way. VIL Subjugates seniority plain and simple and $hit rolls downhill. It doesn’t lead to having a weekend or more days off. We just get less productive trips that are un commutable because “They need to use us.” There is absolutely no difference between paying two guys 70 or one guy 85 and one 55. Just because one guy sits at home doesn’t mean the other wants to work 85. Without VIL there is a chance that those who get LCR may not be called or escalated as much. Theoretically the grids should be closer to green allowing drops and swap more often and maybe, possibly on a weekend dare I say. Thats a win for a lot more then the few who bid and awarded these damn VIL’s
There’s an idea. Any base/seat where a VIL is offered then the reserve grid becomes unlocked for the whole month.
Reply
Old 05-11-2025 | 05:26 AM
  #13877  
Bluediver the REAL deal
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 575
Likes: 29
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
There’s an idea. Any base/seat where a VIL is offered then the reserve grid becomes unlocked for the whole month.
Flyby comin in hot with a mic drop. BOOM!
Reply
Old 05-11-2025 | 09:27 AM
  #13878  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 4
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
We’re overstaffed overall, not just with CAs. The displacement bid is correcting the CA over staffing and loss of the 190. Even with that we are overstaffed for our current flying we’re doing. Either way I don’t see taking a hard stand on VILs as being productive or leading to anything meaningful for the pilot group. Quite possibly the exact opposite. We shall see. Moving on.
Perhaps overall....but there are seats which are quite understaffed, possible the largest or second largest seat at the company in fact (JFK320FO). They've had mostly red days every day up until the last month or two with a few green days. So while they went massively understaffed, requiring VDAs every day......we had their counterparts in the left seat at JFK who had the highest number of VILs.....up to 100 guys on reserve with none flying.

The balancing of seats was needed. Sucks that guys are downgraded but it makes no sense to pay FOs VDA AND be paying hundreds of CAs to sit at home. Unless we had CAs able to fly as FO (which I guess our ops spec doesn't allow).
Reply
Old 05-11-2025 | 09:53 AM
  #13879  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 97
Likes: 27
Default

Not allowing the company to do VILs was definitely a mistake and counter productive. I find it very odd the union rolled over and agreed to a 3% raise in exchange for scope relief (at a time when inflation was well
above 3%), but is taking a hard line stance on VILs which benefit many pilots.
Reply
Old 05-11-2025 | 01:23 PM
  #13880  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 30
Default

Originally Posted by holiday
Not allowing the company to do VILs was definitely a mistake and counter productive. I find it very odd the union rolled over and agreed to a 3% raise in exchange for scope relief (at a time when inflation was well
above 3%), but is taking a hard line stance on VILs which benefit many pilots.

new group in the MEC. The group that took the 3% actually took 1% before the pilots revolted. That group would haven given the company whatever they wanted right now.


we didn’t “deny” the company VILs. We simply took an off ramp that was pre negotiated. I’m sure the union would be happy to negotiate continued use or God forbid actually have the company show up to section 6 negotiations ready to make progress.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoomie
Major
36
01-28-2015 11:44 AM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 09:04 AM
Mason32
Regional
277
07-27-2010 06:01 PM
Scott34567
Regional
41
05-29-2008 07:08 PM
Sir James
Major
0
07-29-2005 07:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices