JetBlue Latest and Greatest
06-28-2018 | 01:28 PM
#6932
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Did you read that section? Because you are quoting it wrong. First it’s not 3% asm growth you are referring to. It’s block hours. ASMs are used to establish the relative size of the partner company in that section. ASMs are also referenced in 1F3 regarding amendments to existing codeshares. Second, it’s 1% per year block hour growth required...the 3% is only required for the establishment of/maintaining a new code share measured from comparison to base month.
1F2: For a “new partner”: 3% growth from the base year the codeshare was established. Once we are at that 3% threshold (theoretically in the first year from base-comparison year for it to be authorized in the first place), it’s 1% per year block hour growth required. That’s not that much.
1F3: To renew or amend an existing codeshare: 1 block hour and 1 pilot have to be added in the previous 12 months.
And as for the comment about them having pax on us as well...that’s fine, but I’d rather have their pax on us without a codeshare by us growing organically into their market.
1F2: For a “new partner”: 3% growth from the base year the codeshare was established. Once we are at that 3% threshold (theoretically in the first year from base-comparison year for it to be authorized in the first place), it’s 1% per year block hour growth required. That’s not that much.
1F3: To renew or amend an existing codeshare: 1 block hour and 1 pilot have to be added in the previous 12 months.
And as for the comment about them having pax on us as well...that’s fine, but I’d rather have their pax on us without a codeshare by us growing organically into their market.
Thanks for pointing it out.
07-01-2018 | 06:52 PM
#6935
Banned
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Bozo, you shouldn't advocate a chemical dependency. Don't know why you mention it so often. I hope that your coping mechanisms are serving you well. You seem unhinged from your inability to deal with opposing viewpoints.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
07-14-2018 | 05:52 AM
#6939
Banned
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
That will probably change if the contract passes. People will be coming over to the bus in droves after the 190 was thrown under the Bus in this contract. So good chance you could be off reserve very fast on the 190.
07-14-2018 | 07:07 AM
#6940
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 424
Likes: 26
From: A320 CA
Thank AA and the market for throwing the 190 under the "bus."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
