Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
New CAL/UAL JS Agreement >

New CAL/UAL JS Agreement


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

New CAL/UAL JS Agreement

Old 10-31-2009 | 07:42 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
Simply put, this was a software issue for UAL management to solve.
True. But the problem was, they kept telling the UAX carriers that it was out of their hands, and that management didn't want to fix it. Went on for what, 2 years? The problem was, it WAS changed in the first part of 2008 to kick the priority up of TSA/GoJets pilot above other UAX carriers. So if the system glitch couldn't be changed, how where they able to put one carrier above others, but not able to sort out a particular carrier on that carriers equipment?

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
and Express pilots thought they could hold a gun to the pilots of United. They set a date after which United pilots could not ride the RJ jumpseat unless the United Pilots intervened to solve the problems of the RJ pilots with UAL management. We have enough problems with UAL to fight their battles as well.
Not really, they simply stated that after 2 years, they are tired of UAL not willing to solve the problem. Read the LAST part of the letter again. It wants UAL pilots to contact their reps and let them know what's going on, because the UAX JS chairs are doing nothing but banging their head against the wall trying to get it fixed.

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
They decided to threaten the use of the jumpseat as a means/weapon to get what they wanted. Which was amateurish and wrong.
See above.

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
I can't make it much simpler than that. I frankly don't care what got their panties in a wad over the jumpseat.
So you don't care that pilot is not being given the JS on his OWN equipment?

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
My problem is they were going to use the seat as a weapon thinking that collectively, their tails could wag the dog. If I could type braille for you I would, but by the amount of postings I see you have on this forumn, I don't think it would work.
Not really, they were simply tired of the problem that was going on, and wanted to bring it to the attention of the pilots. How long can you expect something like that to continue, with the JS chairs going through all the proper channels but to no avail? And what was the effect? Did it ever come down to the "war". NOPE, they FINALLY got it straightened out. Pretty sad what it took to get it straightened out, isn't it? But what do you expect when somebody is unwilling to change something? As far as the last part, is that MORE flame?

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
Btw, you said, "As well as wondering why a UAL pilot was being processed ABOVE a UAX pilot on THAT UAX pilot's own company?" I was just wondering, who is in final control of the airplane jumpseat, the "C"aptain or the gate agent?
Yep, we all know the CA is, but the problem that was occurring that most people don't get was this; At locations where the plane is distant from the gate, and or the UAL/UAX gate agent is poorly trained, the UAX pilot was not even being given the OMC and able to walk down to see the CA, only the UAL pilot was. Now the UAX pilot is being denied the seat.
Reply
Old 10-31-2009 | 08:31 AM
  #52  
Fritzthepilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
True. But the problem was, they kept telling the UAX carriers that it was out of their hands, and that management didn't want to fix it. Went on for what, 2 years? The problem was, it WAS changed in the first part of 2008 to kick the priority up of TSA/GoJets pilot above other UAX carriers. So if the system glitch couldn't be changed, how where they able to put one carrier above others, but not able to sort out a particular carrier on that carriers equipment?



Not really, they simply stated that after 2 years, they are tired of UAL not willing to solve the problem. Read the LAST part of the letter again. It wants UAL pilots to contact their reps and let them know what's going on, because the UAX JS chairs are doing nothing but banging their head against the wall trying to get it fixed.



See above.



So you don't care that pilot is not being given the JS on his OWN equipment?



Not really, they were simply tired of the problem that was going on, and wanted to bring it to the attention of the pilots. How long can you expect something like that to continue, with the JS chairs going through all the proper channels but to no avail? And what was the effect? Did it ever come down to the "war". NOPE, they FINALLY got it straightened out. Pretty sad what it took to get it straightened out, isn't it? But what do you expect when somebody is unwilling to change something? As far as the last part, is that MORE flame?



Yep, we all know the CA is, but the problem that was occurring that most people don't get was this; At locations where the plane is distant from the gate, and or the UAL/UAX gate agent is poorly trained, the UAX pilot was not even being given the OMC and able to walk down to see the CA, only the UAL pilot was. Now the UAX pilot is being denied the seat.
It will sound cold, but I could care less about the jumpseat snafu's at other carriers. I could care less how long it has been going on, and barriers in place to prevent a solution for that carrier.

We have our own set of distinct issues here at United. None of which you should care about. I will say that we just put 1450 pilots out on the street at the same time Glenn Tilton and the gang are exponentially growing the RJ fleet. Most are being furloughed for the second time. To that end, you won't find many here who care about the travails of the Express pilots. If a childish stunt threatening to ban us from the jumpseat is ever employed again, I can assure the Express pilots that the outcome might not be as pleasant.

Like your avatar. Happy Halloween!
Reply
Old 10-31-2009 | 09:17 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
It will sound cold, but I could care less about the jumpseat snafu's at other carriers. I could care less how long it has been going on, and barriers in place to prevent a solution for that carrier.
Gotta love that "it's all about me" attitude.

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
We have our own set of distinct issues here at United. None of which you should care about. I will say that we just put 1450 pilots out on the street at the same time Glenn Tilton and the gang are exponentially growing the RJ fleet. Most are being furloughed for the second time.
Wow, the company I work for has the second highest count of furloughed pilots on the street, right behind UAL. UAL is not the only company in the crapper right now.

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
To that end, you won't find many here who care about the travails of the Express pilots. If a childish stunt threatening to ban us from the jumpseat is ever employed again, I can assure the Express pilots that the outcome might not be as pleasant.
Amazing how that "childish stunt" as you put it ACTUALLY got the problem resolved, isn't it? After TWO years of going though the proper channels.

And please, answer me this.

Why should a GoJet pilot get ANY kind of priority for anything?

And how is the one of the most anti scab airlines going to to give JS priority to the airlines that has the most scabs?
Reply
Old 10-31-2009 | 09:43 AM
  #54  
Fritzthepilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
Gotta love that "it's all about me" attitude.



Wow, the company I work for has the second highest count of furloughed pilots on the street, right behind UAL. UAL is not the only company in the crapper right now.



Amazing how that "childish stunt" as you put it ACTUALLY got the problem resolved, isn't it? After TWO years of going though the proper channels.

And please, answer me this.

Why should a GoJet pilot get ANY kind of priority for anything?

And how is the one of the most anti scab airlines going to to give JS priority to the airlines that has the most scabs?
I now understand why you have so many posts.

I never said it was about me. I care the United pilots. I could care less about whether Timmy can get his jumpseat on his airline.

So you say jumpseats should not be used a weapon but appear to agree that what they did was ok. Have a great career skippy! And yes, that was a flame.
Reply
Old 10-31-2009 | 09:53 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
I now understand why you have so many posts.
If you keep it up, you'll be there shortly.

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
I never said it was about me. I care the United pilots. I could care less about whether Timmy can get his jumpseat on his airline.
Sorry, but the last sentence contradicts the first.

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
So you say jumpseats should not be used a weapon but appear to agree that what they did was ok. Have a great career skippy! And yes, that was a flame.
Not what I said, you're putting words in my mouth.

You have a great career also

Any chance you might be able to answer the questions about GoJets and the scabs?
Reply
Old 10-31-2009 | 10:02 AM
  #56  
Fritzthepilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
If you keep it up, you'll be there shortly.



Sorry, but the last sentence contradicts the first.



Not what I said, you're putting words in my mouth.

You have a great career also

Any chance you might be able to answer the questions about GoJets and the scabs?
Why is this being drug into a "why I should care about the plight of express pilots." GMAFB!

Bevis, all I originally said was 1) Jumpseats should not be used as a weapon and 2) The United Express routes are actually United routes. Nothing else.

When 1450 pilot jobs are outsourced, I care about those pilots and their families. 90% of the f/o's I flew with are on the street. Why should I care about the problems at express?

Nuff said..
Reply
Old 10-31-2009 | 10:47 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
Why is this being drug into a "why I should care about the plight of express pilots." GMAFB!
Never was. But it's pretty safe to say that there was gross ignorance displayed about what REALLY happened during the UAX JS fiasco, and not by me.

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
Bevis, all I originally said was 1) Jumpseats should not be used as a weapon and
Never disagreed with that point. But if it's going to be made, the UAL guys that still carry the list better start putting it away. Especially between one specific city pair in the UAL and CAL route system.

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
2) The United Express routes are actually United routes. Nothing else.
Never disagreed with that either, you misread what I wrote.

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
When 1450 pilot jobs are outsourced, I care about those pilots and their families. 90% of the f/o's I flew with are on the street.
I cared about the guys that got furloughed from my last job, then I became one of them later. I care about the guys furloughed from my current job. A lot of the FO''s I flew with are on the street ALSO. Are you somehow better than anybody else?

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
Why should I care about the problems at express?

Nuff said..
Pilots are their own worst enemies. Sadly, it's been proven time and time again.

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
This conversation is over chief.
True, take care and fly safe.
Reply
Old 10-31-2009 | 11:03 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
Default

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
Simply put, this was a software issue for UAL management to solve. Express pilots thought they could hold a gun to the pilots of United. They set a date after which United pilots could not ride the RJ jumpseat unless the United Pilots intervened to solve the problems of the RJ pilots with UAL management. We have enough problems with UAL to fight their battles as well.

They decided to threaten the use of the jumpseat as a means/weapon to get what they wanted. Which was amateurish and wrong.

I can't make it much simpler than that. I frankly don't care what got their panties in a wad over the jumpseat. My problem is they were going to use the seat as a weapon thinking that collectively, their tails could wag the dog. If I could type braille for you I would, but by the amount of postings I see you have on this forumn, I don't think it would work.

Calling names? Dude, life's too short. I was stating that as long as people are respectful and are not shi$'s when they come in the cockpit, all are welcome. Even when an Express pilot shows up with a "Guppy Killer" sticker, I would not use the seat as a weapon as long as they were respectful on my plane. That won't preclude me from saying something to him/her when we were in the air, but they can ride the jumpseat.

Btw, you said, "As well as wondering why a UAL pilot was being processed ABOVE a UAX pilot on THAT UAX pilot's own company?" I was just wondering, who is in final control of the airplane jumpseat, the "C"aptain or the gate agent?

Well I will disagree with you here fritz I would not let them ride with a guppy killer sticker on their bags. Many of my fo were flying that guppy not too long ago and something like that sticker sets off some tough feelings and takes my fo out of the loop on that leg? No thanks, would rather not take the jumpseater and work well with my fo.
Reply
Old 10-31-2009 | 11:52 AM
  #59  
Fritzthepilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by syd111
Well I will disagree with you here fritz I would not let them ride with a guppy killer sticker on their bags. Many of my fo were flying that guppy not too long ago and something like that sticker sets off some tough feelings and takes my fo out of the loop on that leg? No thanks, would rather not take the jumpseater and work well with my fo.
As you wish. I'd rather have him in the cockpit for 2 hrs or so and rip him a new one. My f/o's most definitely knew I was on their side.

Take Care.
Reply
Old 11-01-2009 | 12:13 PM
  #60  
Flyer2000's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: B-767 CA
Default

well I won't get in the middle of Fritz, and DoJet, but I support any airline pilot groups right to run their jumpseat as they see fit. If UAL, and CAL want to enter into some agreement, than that is their choice. Just because one airline flies contract for another should not dictate how each airline runs their respective jumpseat priorities.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
forgot to bid
Major
485
04-03-2009 07:34 PM
Phlying Phallus
Major
192
02-12-2009 02:33 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
TPROP4ever
GoJet
322
11-24-2008 08:45 AM
BoilerUP
Regional
110
09-06-2008 08:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices