Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2010 | 06:31 AM
  #1111  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Carl, tell me how that math works in your world. Why would ALPA prefer a $50/hr pilot who will pay $1/hr in dues to fly a 76 seater, rather than a $150/hr pilot who will pay $3/hr in dues?

Is that some of that new math I've been hearing about?
I'll tell you how math works in everyone's world dude:

When these guys who make 150 an hour continue to be replaced by pilots who make a third of that but fly aircraft, less than a third in size, you need more than 3 times that amount in RJ's and RJ pilots. ALPA sees that, despite the fact that you don't.

ALPA wants to be on the winning side. They see the majors as a slowly declining entity, and regionals as the future of domestic air travel. They've clearly made their choice...and I've made mine.

Carl
Reply
Old 10-14-2010 | 06:36 AM
  #1112  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
No kidding. What I think Carl is missing though, is that this is ALPA with Prater, the guy that got defeated. Also the guy that brought us Age 65, and the guy that's trying to get us 10 hours flight time per day. I know it's conventional "wisdom" around these parts that LM is just going a management stooge, and will just do it bigger and better. But maybe, just maybe, the LM that was Chairman as this MEC led us through BK, the JV's and the merger isn't quite the idiotic boot-licker some suggest. Obviously, he's not as smart as us here on APC, but maybe, just maybe, he gets a chance to run the union now.

So maybe, just maybe, we focus on trying to send a message to our reps about the direction we want from National on the 500/1,500 hour discussion, and the 10-hour block limit on FTDT regs, and the commuting language in that NPRM. I know it might detract from our APC duties, but maybe we're supposed to, you know, give guidance to our reps, and give a chance to work to this representational system we're not even intelligent nough... to use because we're too busy whining about the fact it doesn't work.
What Carl is missing? What Carl is missing?!? Look at what you just missed dude! You just put out a laundry list of what we should tell our reps about the future direction...AND YOU MISSED SCOPE!

Nice going Private Pyle!

Carl
Reply
Old 10-14-2010 | 06:42 AM
  #1113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird
Despite giving mother Delta a joint contract on a silver platter that included a ridiculous amount of 70+ seat RJ's, many of us MD 88 drivers are STILL paid almost exactly what our AMR peers make after all of our raises. Many Delta pilots that I fly with and know, feel that we left some low hanging fruit on the tree with the Joint Contract. Yes, a majority of the Delta pilots voted for the JC, there are however many that feel DALPA had leverage because of mngt's need to get the merger done and we gave that away.

There is a group of FO's that after a 5 year furlough came back to see ALPA back the age 65 rule. That alone is enough for me to at least take a look at other options when it comes to our representation. Now throw in ALPA's backing of the 500 hr rule, it's a no brainer imo, our best interest are not being represented. After what many Delta pilots have been through I don't think it should come as a surprise to anyone that many of us would consider making a change.
You do know that management had the right to merge the airlines and not even tell us about until we saw it on CNN? Right, you have read our contract and see the section where management is explicitly given the right to merge the carriers with no contractual changes from us? Please tell me that you have read that?

That is what happened when we merged with Western, that is what happened when NW merged with Republic, and that is what happened in all the other mergers so far. So the only leverage that we had in this merger is leverage that we created out of thin air. Management had the right to tell us to stay in our old contract, give us no stock, and then merge anyway. It would have slowed down the process, but it would have happened with us or without us. So it is pretty funny that you claim we passed up leverage when we totally created every ounce of our leverage from nothing.

What do you think would have happened if ALPA did not get involved in the age 65 legislation? You do know that the original legislation gave recently retired pilots the right to come back to their airline with their original seniority number, right? What would that have done to you and your buddies?

So go ahead and consider your other options. I am really at the point where I would like to see the nuts take over the nuthouse and then watch as they crash spectacularly, just like they did over at the APA. Maybe you think it will help your career to have your negotiations sidelined for four years while these guys thump their chests and bang their heads on brick walls. Every one of the crack pot theories that the web board warriors espouse here has been tried in the past and they all fail. Negotiations are a business transaction and not a male organ measuring contest. Navigating through a complicated business transaction takes experience, hard work, and tremendous stress. Shouting, posturing, and demagoguery will only get you a trip to the parking lot, where the NMB will wait until you are ready to complete a business transaction. But go ahead, try it out, I am sure it will work this time.
Reply
Old 10-14-2010 | 06:46 AM
  #1114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
What Carl is missing? What Carl is missing?!? Look at what you just missed dude! You just put out a laundry list of what we should tell our reps about the future direction...AND YOU MISSED SCOPE!

Nice going Private Pyle!

Carl
OMG! I forgot to say SCOPE! That must mean I'm some sort of stupid scope-caver. GMAFB Carl, I'm the end of the seniority list that takes it right in the old butt when we make scope mistakes. You think I'm walking around wearing Canadair t-shirts? Poor SCOPE has mean "furlough" to me, while to you it's one more issue to capitalize on as you argue in support of DPA. Pontificate all you want in your support of the DPA, but at some point it becomes juuuuust a little over-the-top to have a 747 Captain giving small-gauge scope lessons to junior first officers.
Reply
Old 10-14-2010 | 06:47 AM
  #1115  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
No T the cost of making you whole of the cost of what has not been contributed to yours over the last five years.
Ya lost me there. What hasn't been contributed since bankruptcy?
Reply
Old 10-14-2010 | 06:48 AM
  #1116  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Carl;
It is not all about money. One of ALPA's tenants is to represent all pilots. Getting pilot groups to join from all ranks backs that up. It is basic trade unionism. Crazy I know.
You got that smiley face, so you might just be joking. Just in case you're not, trade unionism has never allowed another union's members to undercut other union members.

But I know you know that.

Carl
Reply
Old 10-14-2010 | 06:49 AM
  #1117  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
Did I miss a vote or something?
You weren't invited to participate.
Reply
Old 10-14-2010 | 06:58 AM
  #1118  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Free Bird
That other airline (AMR) is certainly a measuring stick as to where we are at as a pilot group imo. Both of you guys (alfa + Nu) have some valid points to be considered.

Despite giving mother Delta a joint contract on a silver platter that included a ridiculous amount of 70+ seat RJ's, many of us MD 88 drivers are STILL paid almost exactly what our AMR peers make after all of our raises. Many Delta pilots that I fly with and know, feel that we left some low hanging fruit on the tree with the Joint Contract. Yes, a majority of the Delta pilots voted for the JC, there are however many that feel DALPA had leverage because of mngt's need to get the merger done and we gave that away.

There is a group of FO's that after a 5 year furlough came back to see ALPA back the age 65 rule. That alone is enough for me to at least take a look at other options when it comes to our representation. Now throw in ALPA's backing of the 500 hr rule, it's a no brainer imo, our best interest are not being represented. After what many Delta pilots have been through I don't think it should come as a surprise to anyone that many of us would consider making a change.
Not really wanting to get immersed in this colossal waste of time, but don't you think management is making this same argument within? They probably left what (in retrospect) they feel was low hanging fruit, but for both sides, Monday morning quarterbacking is fairly pointless. I know that many here want to give the company a bloody nose, but I really don't think is going to be worthwhile in this business and economic environment. The Dave Stevens/Bob Shelton type of leadership will gain us nothing...
Reply
Old 10-14-2010 | 07:00 AM
  #1119  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Maybe those behind DPA can run for MEC Chair!
Interesting sarcasm. I think if you truly see alpa as reformable, you are totally missing the point and angst of those that are at least interested in dpa.
Reply
Old 10-14-2010 | 07:01 AM
  #1120  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Like I said early on in this thread, ALPA sees its growth in members and in dues at the regionals. ALPA's growth is what's critical to its survival...not your growth or my growth.

Carl

This^^^^^^^^^^^ .... again
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices