Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2010 | 02:56 PM
  #3011  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Hey PG,

I'm enjoying Thanksgiving with my family. Hope you are too!

I think the problem with your argument is your use of the "boom and bust" concept. Here are the definitions of "boom" and "bust" I found as they relate to business:

Boom - To grow, develop, or progress rapidly; flourish: "Business is booming."

Bust - A state of bankruptcy. A time or period of widespread financial depression.

I don't think a 2% pay cut would meet most people's understanding of a "bust", especially when you consider the actual definition of the term. Certainly, a 30% increase could be considered a "boom" under the right circumstances. However, as you point out, our buying power was in a slow, steady decline (even though actual rates were going up or remaining stagnant) in your chart. It could be argued that the 30% increase with C2K was simply a correction to get our profession back on track to where it should be. That's the way I see it. A 42% pay cut, loss of pension, and having thousands of jobs outsourced would I think most definitely be considered a huge "bust" in most people's view. But those were both anomalies, not a normal part of a cycle.

I would write more, but I'm going to enjoy Thanksgiving with my family. I hope everyone else here is able to do the same today! No matter how poorly our careers have gone in recent years, there is much more to life than our jobs. I hope everyone will spend the day focusing on all the many things in life we have to be thankful for. Happy Thanksgiving everyone!!!
Good on you. My family and I will have to wait a few more days.

I'm stuck in Asia wondering if I can order stuffing with my squid and eel?

Happy Thanksgiving to you!

Carl
Reply
Old 11-25-2010 | 02:57 PM
  #3012  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
.......


Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
Same to you brudda! Great thread you started by the way!

Carl
Reply
Old 11-25-2010 | 02:58 PM
  #3013  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,870
Likes: 188
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
Why shouldn't labor be a fixed cost?

It should be.

What if we took it a step further. What if ALPA labor was a fixed cost?

An ALPA 757 pilot at Ucal/Dal/or any ALPA carrier that operates them has a set floor.

How do we get from here to there? How can we make such a change? How does it work that this is the case with RR's?

You don't under the RLA. If the RLA were to be repealed which is not likely then you have a chance. To understand how important the RLA is to management you need only take a look at Fedex. Fedex does not belong under the RLA. They are a package delivery company. A bill was placed in Congress to remove them from the RLA. Fred Smith was so concerned about this happening that he wrote into his aircraft purchase contracts that all his orders could be canceled if Fedex were removed from the RLA. He went right to Congress and told them he would buy all Airbuses and cancel every Boeing order if they followed through. The bill died a quiet death.
Reply
Old 11-25-2010 | 03:14 PM
  #3014  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
DAL88, where are you? Carl states that modest increases, which were in reality modest decreases when adjusted for inflation, are something to be proud of.
Modest increase in pay rates from 1932 to 2001 are indeed something to be proud of. The fact that our pay has gone down when adjusted for inflation 30 years into the future, is something ALPA cannot control. Nobody can. We can only negotiate pay rates based on today's data, then hope that government fiscal policy doesn't destroy the purchasing power of our underlying currency decades later. Do you really not get that? Really?

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Eerily similar to LM claiming that we are now back to pre-bankruptcy pay rates, don't you think?
Again...are you serious? Where did I ever say something as stupid as our pay rates are back to pre-bankruptcy levels? I know the "Dear Leader" said it, but I never did. How on Earth is what Moak said even remotely similar to my factual statement that we had modest and steady increases in pay rates since 1932 and prior to 9/11? Duuuuude!

Carl
Reply
Old 11-25-2010 | 03:21 PM
  #3015  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Fair enough. I just find it mildly entertaining that no one calls Carl down on his "steady modest pay raises", but had no problem castrating LM for ignoring the inflation aspect when he essentially stated the same thing.
Does it even matter to you that I've never done any such thing? Are your own pre-conceived ideas about people so extreme, that you completely make stuff up? And please try to find another word for insulting someone dude.

This will be interesting if anybody can find a single post where I've ever made such a statement about Moak.

Carl
Reply
Old 11-25-2010 | 03:23 PM
  #3016  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Thanks for showing up just to put words in my mouth.
Yeah...don't you just hate it when guys do that!

Carl
Reply
Old 11-25-2010 | 03:26 PM
  #3017  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Up until recently, airline pilots had a bigger piece of the pie (okay, I can't even think about pie right now!). We are no less important today than we were for decades before this past one. Some of those variables need to be shuffled around and properly compensating us needs to have a higher priority than it does right now. I want the folks representing me to be making the case for this, not making the case for why it supposedly cannot happen.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This!

Carl
Reply
Old 11-25-2010 | 03:30 PM
  #3018  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
We are no less important today than we were for decades before this past one.
Originally Posted by satchip
Dal, I have to disagree with you on this one. I think several market forces have driven down our value and subsequently our compensation from the lofty heights of yesteryear.
Really? You disagree with DAL88 who says we are no less important today than we were? He's talking about our importance, not market forces based value. You didn't really mean to disagree about our importance...did you?

Carl
Reply
Old 11-25-2010 | 03:34 PM
  #3019  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Does it even matter to you that I've never done any such thing? Are your own pre-conceived ideas about people so extreme, that you completely make stuff up? And please try to find another word for insulting someone dude.

This will be interesting if anybody can find a single post where I've ever made such a statement about Moak.

Carl
Carl, relax my friend. My references to people criticizing LM never referred to you; they just happened to be in the same post. But no where did I state (or even imply) that it was YOU criticizing LM for his letter.
Reply
Old 11-25-2010 | 04:09 PM
  #3020  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Carl, relax my friend. My references to people criticizing LM never referred to you; they just happened to be in the same post. But no where did I state (or even imply) that it was YOU criticizing LM for his letter.
Sure sounded like it me.

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Fair enough. I just find it mildly entertaining that no one calls Carl down on his "steady modest pay raises", but had no problem castrating LM for ignoring the inflation aspect when he essentially stated the same thing.
OK. I'll take you at your word.

Carl
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices