Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2010, 09:17 AM
  #3031  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Carl,

ALPA's being honest about where we are at.
If ALPA is hiding behind the NMB problem, then they should say so. In this way, we could use the national efforts of ALL unions to begin a call to action campaign for our leaders in congress to stop this abuse of power.

If ALPA believes that we have lost the right to strike due to NMB thuggery, say so. But don't say nothing and leave it to the members to try and convince our own union before we go up against management.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 11-26-2010, 10:13 AM
  #3032  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Knew N,

With nonsensical scope limits, we do have real exposures to market forces. Does anyone doubt that the Company (and our Union) would seek to maximize revenue if a serious threat existed to the Company's survival? Both sides would be telling us how smart it would be to utilized outsourced flying to its maximum certified capacity. (That's the OBJECTIVE limit) In a serious downturn does anyone seriously think $40 million dollar regional jets under long term contracts are going to get parked, when management already touts the flexibility provided them by operating a fully depreciated mainline narrowbody fleet that costs little more than fuel for the trip to Victorville?

(... and before the apologists start talking about 50 seaters, no, I'm talking E175's that could even replace our Latin America work)


ALPA will never come right out and say we now have to compete with the alter ego airlines they assisted in creating, but that's the truth of the matter.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
The really twisted part about all this newK, is that OUR UNION SHOULD BE MAKING THIS CASE TO US! Why the hell should we be trying to convince our own union, and then convince management? Why does it feel like we have two adversaries instead of just one?

Not P***ed at you, just venting about the fact that your post illustrates what a non-union feeling it is to be part of ALPA.

Carl
Carl,

Never let it be said that I am one who is slow to concede a point. Touche'.

I will offer a weak defense of ALPA in in that my APC disagreements on negotiating expectations are with people who are only rumored to be ALPA officials. If they are higher-ups in the organization though, they have dropped the ball. But, this still does not absolve ALPA when it does come to communications about our expectations for 2012. They have done nothing and, in my opinion, they are missing a golden opportunity. Yes, it does seem like their ineptness does at the very least make them an obstacle - another hurdle to be jumped so to speak - if not an adversary. That's pretty sad.

Bar, here is where your post comes in. My previous post states my belief that we as Delta pilots should be proclaiming that we will not be hedged in to a negotiating position because of what American Airlines pilots do or do not get. Hell, it might help them get what they want. But, we should also be offering full support for our brothers and sisters over at the new United in their efforts to end the outsourcing of our flying. Unless, I've missed it, we have been largely silent on the issue.

In my opinion, this is the perfect time for us to be:

1.) Supporting AMR pilots efforts to obtain a restoration contract by letting AMR management that Delta pilots "want it too." &

2.) Supporting United pilots efforts to get rid of the rj's by any and every means we have available to us. (Public statements, picketing along with them, etc.)

To me, the bottom line is; in 2012, Delta pilots should aim for a contract that, at a minimum, realize the gains that AMR and UAL pilots are aiming for. The bottom line is that either we want what American Airlines pilots want and we want what United Airlines pilots want, or we are willing to work for less. To me, any statement -- written, verbal, or one that can be implied by our silence -- that we are willing to accept less than them, in a very real sense, signals to their managements that we are the ones who are willing to undercut those pilot groups efforts-- and that sucks.

New K Now
newKnow is offline  
Old 11-26-2010, 01:03 PM
  #3033  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Superdad's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 7ERB, no M88, no 7ER, no A320, NEXT!
Posts: 397
Default

I find all of this talk about our expectations being managed, a bit silly. I have my own expectations and if the TA that is presented to me does not meet those expectations I will vote no.

Stop worrying about whether or not someone is trying to manage your expectations, and when the time comes, vote on the merits of the agreement.
Superdad is offline  
Old 11-26-2010, 01:15 PM
  #3034  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

Originally Posted by newknow View Post
bar, here is where your post comes in. My previous post states my belief that we as delta pilots should be proclaiming that we will not be hedged in to a negotiating position because of what american airlines pilots do or do not get. Hell, it might help them get what they want. but, we should also be offering full support for our brothers and sisters over at the new united in their efforts to end the outsourcing of our flying. unless, i've missed it, we have been largely silent on the issue.

in my opinion, this is the perfect time for us to be:

1.) supporting amr pilots efforts to obtain a restoration contract by letting amr management that delta pilots "want it too." &

2.) supporting united pilots efforts to get rid of the rj's by any and every means we have available to us. (public statements, picketing along with them, etc.)


to me, the bottom line is; in 2012, delta pilots should aim for a contract that, at a minimum, realize the gains that amr and ual pilots are aiming for. The bottom line is that either we want what american airlines pilots want and we want what united airlines pilots want, or we are willing to work for less. To me, any statement -- written, verbal, or one that can be implied by our silence -- that we are willing to accept less than them, in a very real sense, signals to their managements that we are the ones who are willing to undercut those pilot groups efforts-- and that sucks.

new k now
+ 1 And this comes back to the conflict of interest a union that represents both sides of scope has. It will continue to be a problem, effectively muzzling those leaders we would like to be yelling from the housetops to take back scope. Anybody that does not acknowledge this is simply not being honest with themselves or those around them.

Last edited by Jack Bauer; 11-26-2010 at 01:38 PM.
Jack Bauer is offline  
Old 11-26-2010, 03:46 PM
  #3035  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Superdad View Post
I find all of this talk about our expectations being managed, a bit silly. I have my own expectations and if the TA that is presented to me does not meet those expectations I will vote no.

Stop worrying about whether or not someone is trying to manage your expectations, and when the time comes, vote on the merits of the agreement.
Here's something that really needs to be discussed. This seems like a simple and reasonable thought, but in reality it puts you at a huge disadvantage. Here's why:

At NWA, our negotiators lowered expectations very, very far. We all thought what you thought. We'd just vote it down if we didn't like it. Then when the BK contract proffer came out, our pilots were stunned at the appearance of the negotiating committee giving away items that the company didn't even ask for. When the negotiating committee heard from the reps how furious the pilots were and that we were most likely going to vote it down, the negotiating committee came out and said: "Fine, but there is no plan B folks. If you turn this down, I don't even know what we'll do!" That's when some pilots realized that we would look even weaker in management's eyes to return to the table with negotiators that have no alternative plan to ask for more.

THAT is why it is so important for the negotiators to enter in to the fight knowing the expectations of their pilot group, and fighting like hell for them right from the start. Expectations of the rank and file are the ammunition for our negotiators.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 11-26-2010, 04:55 PM
  #3036  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

ALPA as a "money grubbing" organization will promote scope, not mitigate it. After all, block hours at mainline generate more dues money than any regional airline could hope to make on a per block hour basis.....

Therefore if scope is relequished it is a failure of the mainline pilots allowing it rather than ALPA National "hoping for it".
shiznit is offline  
Old 11-26-2010, 05:40 PM
  #3037  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Superdad's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 7ERB, no M88, no 7ER, no A320, NEXT!
Posts: 397
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Here's something that really needs to be discussed. This seems like a simple and reasonable thought, but in reality it puts you at a huge disadvantage. Here's why:

At NWA, our negotiators lowered expectations very, very far. We all thought what you thought. We'd just vote it down if we didn't like it. Then when the BK contract proffer came out, our pilots were stunned at the appearance of the negotiating committee giving away items that the company didn't even ask for. When the negotiating committee heard from the reps how furious the pilots were and that we were most likely going to vote it down, the negotiating committee came out and said: "Fine, but there is no plan B folks. If you turn this down, I don't even know what we'll do!" That's when some pilots realized that we would look even weaker in management's eyes to return to the table with negotiators that have no alternative plan to ask for more.

THAT is why it is so important for the negotiators to enter in to the fight knowing the expectations of their pilot group, and fighting like hell for them right from the start. Expectations of the rank and file are the ammunition for our negotiators.

Carl
I would agree with your thoughts, except that the negotiators will know what the pilots expect or desire through polling and other means. If they don't bring us what we asked for then we will surely know that they don't represent our will.

In addition, this time around we are not negotiating a bankruptcy agreement so the notion that we will be forced into something sub par because the union has no "plan b," is a little far fetched.
Superdad is offline  
Old 11-26-2010, 05:47 PM
  #3038  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Superdad View Post
In addition, this time around we are not negotiating a bankruptcy agreement so the notion that we will be forced into something sub par because the union has no "plan b," is a little far fetched.
What I'm afraid is going to happen is that they will negotiate traditional ("reasonable") improvements to our bankruptcy agreement. That will not even make so much as a dent in restoration. Talk about sub par!

The ugly fact is that it is going to take very substantial improvements to overcome the very substantial cuts we took and all the lost ground to our careers that we have endured ever since.

Does it sound to you like DALPA is up for that? I haven't heard anything that makes it sound like that to me. In fact, so far it sounds like just the contrary.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 11-26-2010, 06:05 PM
  #3039  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Superdad's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 7ERB, no M88, no 7ER, no A320, NEXT!
Posts: 397
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
What I'm afraid is going to happen is that they will negotiate traditional ("reasonable") improvements to our bankruptcy agreement. That will not even make so much as a dent in restoration. Talk about sub par!

The ugly fact is that it is going to take very substantial improvements to overcome the very substantial cuts we took and all the lost ground to our careers that we have endured ever since.

Does it sound to you like DALPA is up for that? I haven't heard anything that makes it sound like that to me. In fact, so far it sounds like just the contrary.
I agree that DALPA hasn't stated that they are up for the task, but the greater deafening silence from DPA isn't any comfort either.
Superdad is offline  
Old 11-26-2010, 06:40 PM
  #3040  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
Does it sound to you like DALPA is up for that? I haven't heard anything that makes it sound like that to me. In fact, so far it sounds like just the contrary.
Who have you been talking to? ALL the recent elected LEC reps have been VERY emphatic about restoration....Heck even the incumbents were concerned with restoration.....
You likely won't see much of anything in official channels though.....It reminds me of an adage about "keeping your cards close to your chest".
shiznit is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices