Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2010 | 09:25 AM
  #591  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: New Hire
Default

Originally Posted by Coto Pilot
The same talk has been going on at United. You can't have the same union representing the pilots of the mainline and regionals, there interest are diometrically opposed. I think this will eventually be the demise of ALPA.

I don't understand why some folks thing regional pilots and mainline pilots have different goals. It is a myth at best.
Reply
Old 09-25-2010 | 10:06 AM
  #592  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingSig
There's a big reason CAL went back to ALPA after IACP (I was an IACP dues payer and volunteer at one point in my life). The politics of how they came back aside, bottom line is they needed ALPA much more than ALPA needed them. It's the same reason FedEx joined ALPA. (Side note, once the IACP came to ALPA, Mainline and Express split off from one group....hmmm precedent? Compass/Delta? See catusmike's post above and see if a lightbulb goes off)

The solution is done through voting, not going it alone.

... I know I won't be sending (a card) in.
Excellent post
Reply
Old 09-25-2010 | 10:16 AM
  #593  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by shadyops
I don't understand why some folks thing regional pilots and mainline pilots have different goals. It is a myth at best.
You are correct.

At most, ALPA has a problem in the rare instance that one MEC starts to negotiate something that might harm another MEC. In that case, ALPA National provides a forum and method of resolution. (we know who the most powerful LEC and MEC are in ALPA)

The answer to any conflict of interest is UNITY. One can not fight with itself. Scope can be restored by building bridges and letting ALPA members participate together in the process.

Up to now, scope has not been restored because our local leadership has not reached a consensus to achieve that goal. It is not an ALPA National issue, it is a local issue with a local answer.

I am encouraged by the positions taken by our current Reps and our MEC's action to preserve Compass and Mesaba employment.
Reply
Old 09-25-2010 | 11:35 AM
  #594  
NWA320pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: 737 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by shadyops
I don't understand why some folks thing regional pilots and mainline pilots have different goals. It is a myth at best.
You are correct majors/regionals don't have different goals. What we both want is to get the most flying for the most money. The difference is we both want it for our own companies!
Reply
Old 09-25-2010 | 11:59 AM
  #595  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,253
Likes: 96
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by shadyops
I don't understand why some folks thing regional pilots and mainline pilots have different goals. It is a myth at best.
The commuters of today are much larger than those of yesterday. Partly as a result of this many will not be able to move on to a major, resulting in many more staying at the commuter for their entire careers.

I think we will continue to see a lot of pressure from the senior pilots at the commuters to capture more flying via larger aircraft.

It is true DAL is parking a lot of 50 seaters, and this is good for mainline pilots but I don't think a lot of regional guys are happy about it. What happens in the 76-124 seat market is all important and remains to be seen.

Scoop
Reply
Old 09-25-2010 | 01:19 PM
  #596  
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
The commuters of today are much larger than those of yesterday. Partly as a result of this many will not be able to move on to a major, resulting in many more staying at the commuter for their entire careers.

I think we will continue to see a lot of pressure from the senior pilots at the commuters to capture more flying via larger aircraft.

It is true DAL is parking a lot of 50 seaters, and this is good for mainline pilots but I don't think a lot of regional guys are happy about it. What happens in the 76-124 seat market is all important and remains to be seen.

Scoop
If DAL mainline gets more Aircraft or taks flying from one of their regional carriers, this is a good thing overall as it will create more Main line jobs at higher rates with better benefits. DAL will hire Pilots!.

This is good for DAL and Good for the Industry especially if DALPA improves
their scope clause. Hopefully a new BAR is set and UA/CAL, ALA, AA and USair will meet or exceed this in their coming contracts.

True it is bad (in the short term) for the regionals who lose flying but the vast majority of Regional pilots have their sights set on getting on with a Major. More Major jobs is goos for everybody.

Also realize that much of the Regional flying currently being done was once done by Mainline and this flying was Outsourced to Lower labor costs.

Simply Put. Which is a better scenario......Growing Majors or Growing Regionals?
Reply
Old 09-25-2010 | 01:28 PM
  #597  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
You are correct majors/regionals don't have different goals. What we both want is to get the most flying for the most money. The difference is we both want it for our own companies!
Of course, but therin lies the rub. Flying at mainline stays at mainline (until and unless mainline gives it away of course). But any new flying regionals "gain" can't possibly be a lasting gain for anyone's company or seniority list. If DAL/UAL/ETC agree tomorrow to outsource the E190/195 or C series, some regionals will of course get that flying. But it won't last unless they are committed to permantly being the low bidder. To get today's RFP for growth AND to KEEP tomorrow's RFP for existing flying. That will mean competing against other regionals who will always be just as hungry as you for growth, upgrades, seniority list advancement and the like. So the seat count would go up, and maybe even with a temporary raise/upgrades, but in the long run it will be back to today's status quo and likely less. As an added bonus, there will be fewer better jobs to go to, by choice or necessity. And at the end of the day the sector as a whole won't be any more secure.

That is why any additional flying to the regionals on behalf of a mainline partner is bad for the careers of both. The quick high of regional upgrades, which to no small irony and no small part is looked upon as a good thing for the PIC building opportunities to eventually go to a mainline carrier for many (and even helpes drive SJS based low bidding in the first place) becomes a self fulfilling prophecy that drags down the mainline and all regionals anyway.
Reply
Old 09-25-2010 | 01:47 PM
  #598  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: New Hire
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
You are correct majors/regionals don't have different goals. What we both want is to get the most flying for the most money. The difference is we both want it for our own companies!

That is incorrect. I fly at Compass. Why would I want more flying here? I want Delta to grow and CPZ to shrink down to nothing. All of us do.

Most regional pilots do not want more flying on the regional side. We know it leads to more crappy jobs.
Reply
Old 09-25-2010 | 01:52 PM
  #599  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: New Hire
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
The commuters of today are much larger than those of yesterday. Partly as a result of this many will not be able to move on to a major, resulting in many more staying at the commuter for their entire careers.

I think we will continue to see a lot of pressure from the senior pilots at the commuters to capture more flying via larger aircraft.

It is true DAL is parking a lot of 50 seaters, and this is good for mainline pilots but I don't think a lot of regional guys are happy about it. What happens in the 76-124 seat market is all important and remains to be seen.

Scoop
Speaking for myself I am glad to see the 50 seaters go away. I feel for the people who lost their jobs and I was one of them. But in order for long term gains regional pilots will have to deal with some short losses. The majority of regional pilots want more higher paying jobs at mainline. Plain and simple.
Reply
Old 09-25-2010 | 02:10 PM
  #600  
detpilot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: Trying not to crash
Default

Most regional pilots do not want more flying on the regional side. We know it leads to more crappy jobs.
Except the lifers... and there are more of them than you'd think!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices