Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Jetblue movement...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2013 | 05:41 AM
  #141  
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 0
From: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Default

Originally Posted by porqueno
can someone please explain Jetblues non compete clause to me? thank you
Didn't know we had one. Of course that doesn't mean we don't have one!
Old 08-17-2013 | 08:31 AM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by porqueno
can someone please explain Jetblues non compete clause to me? thank you
Not worth the paper it's written on. Feel free to move on to a real major airline.
Old 08-17-2013 | 09:04 AM
  #143  
Cruise's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Switch, Lever & Light Specialist
Default

Originally Posted by blueballs
It's dangerous to say more seats should mean more pay. My previous airline believed this and was successful in taking one seat out of the plane to give us much less pay than rightfully deserved. Thinking seats are tied to pay would mean it would be ok to fly a 777 for regional wages if they only have 76 seats installed. How would we be able to come up with pay for cargo companies. Banded pay rates are important ( ie small narrow body, heavy, etc.)
Fair enough.....banded rates are fine.

The bigger picture is having a CBA would give you the opportunity to negotiate rates on everything you fly. Currently, you take what they give and have zero say in how that goes down.
Old 08-17-2013 | 09:12 AM
  #144  
jhaviator03's Avatar
Winning Lottery
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: A320 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by porqueno
can someone please explain Jetblues non compete clause to me? thank you
All it means is that you can't go through JB training, then quit and use that training for another carrier. Basically meaningless if you get on with another carrier because you are going to go through their training program and learn the way they want you to fly the aircraft.
Old 08-17-2013 | 11:41 AM
  #145  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Default

It is conceivable that they could go after a body for their "costs" associated with training him. Not a "given" that JB and its' "no compete" would prevail, but I'd wager few have the resources to fight back IF JB went after you.
Old 08-17-2013 | 04:11 PM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by txbusdriver
Not worth the paper it's written on. Feel free to move on to a real major airline.
Why don't you move on you're a bigger problem than management or the pea's. don't be a hypocrite quit at once its the only thing someone as high and mighty as you could do!!!
Old 08-17-2013 | 07:10 PM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by blueballs
Why don't you move on you're a bigger problem than management or the pea's. don't be a hypocrite quit at once its the only thing someone as high and mighty as you could do!!!
Apps are in. Enjoy your 26 page PEA vs 400-500 page contracts.
Old 08-17-2013 | 07:59 PM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by txbusdriver
Could you get it through your pea brain that my and others insistence on higher pay for the 321 is because of our substandard compensation package? Good Lord you are narcissistic.
I see his point and agree. We'll have a hard time arguing the 321 should have an override since it's not common in the industry for it to pay differently than the 320. So rather than fight that uphill battle, fight the one we have better odds on: better pay and benefits on the 320, which will go along with the 321 pay.

I'm sure the ELT would much rather give us a 10% override, though. It looks better on the balance sheet since it'll only affect pay (no change in insurance costs or other benefits) and it will only affect a fraction of the pilot group without raising costs that much. If a 321 override means us rolling over on better pay on the 320 or insurance improvements,they'll jump on it and call it a bargain. We need to focus on improving the 320 stuff and just do what most of the rest of our peer group does by considering them one fleet type.
Old 08-17-2013 | 08:16 PM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Default Jetblue movement...

^^^^

What he said.
Old 08-18-2013 | 05:28 AM
  #150  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by txbusdriver
Could you get it through your pea brain that my and others insistence on higher pay for the 321 is because of our substandard compensation package? Good Lord you are narcissistic.
No, you could and should focus on improving the substandard compensation package, and not a pay rate for you only.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
P-3Bubba
Major
174
04-23-2014 06:14 AM
LuvJockey
Major
14
03-15-2012 03:30 PM
Gman
Major
34
04-12-2007 08:43 PM
mike734
JetBlue
8
02-14-2006 11:07 PM
Sir James
Major
0
07-29-2005 07:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices