Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Representation Discussion >

Delta Representation Discussion

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Representation Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2013 | 04:52 AM
  #251  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by shoelu
Southwest Airlines said Thursday the board of its pilots' union has voted to send a new tentative contract agreement to membership for a ratification vote. The low-cost carrier's pilots in June narrowly rejected a previous deal.

Pilots at Southwest in June voted down a tentative deal reached in January that would have given them pay raises in the midst of a slump in the airline industry.

There had also been grumbling about Southwest's plans to sell travel to Canada and Mexico on partner airlines, which many pilots consider a threat to their jobs.

New Southwest pilots' contract up for vote - USATODAY.com
Interesting cut and paste from that article... You left out the 5 year deal, 2% per year for three years part, and the raise "based on profitability" part for the last 2 years.

How did those last two years work out? ...it's an interesting idea.

What is the current progress and length of negotiations? ...expecting DL pilots may have a slower go of it in 2015.
Reply
Old 09-09-2013 | 04:55 AM
  #252  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
SWAPA currently sets the industry standard for scope and pay, while IPA used to set the standard for pay until FDX (an ALPA carrier) recently beat them.

Carl
No, Carl they don't. Pull out your calculator. Top SWAPA guys don't make anywhere near as much as you do, and when you include our 14% DC, mid level guys don't make as much as our mid level guys, despite their 30 years of profits. For a short period of time, their payrates exceeded ours, but that era is over.
Reply
Old 09-09-2013 | 04:57 AM
  #253  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Second, UPS's top pay rate applies to every aircraft they operate. At Delta, the top pay rate applies to 34 aircraft out of 720 aircraft. Plus UPS has better productivity rules, an 81 hour reserve guarantee, etc.

With this overall picture, UPS pilots (independently represented) are paid far greater than Delta pilots (ALPA represented).



As shown above, your claim is wrong and very misleading on many levels.

Carl
Our M88 guys under C2K made more, adjusted for inflation, than UPS 747 guys do today, despite the fact that UPS's finances are much better than ours were, even back then. They're no industry leader. You need to make up better "facts", if you want to win this argument, Carl.
Reply
Old 09-09-2013 | 04:59 AM
  #254  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
A lot of the reason Delta had such a great contract is because they sold scope to get it. It is such an utter failure to sell scope for massive raises just to then lose them in bankruptcy a few years later, and not get that scope back.
FAIL. That urban legend has already been debunked on here several times. DALPA didn't sell scope in C2K. As a reminder, the Delta PWA permitted unlimited 70 seaters in 1990, and had substantial restrictions in C2K.
Reply
Old 09-09-2013 | 05:04 AM
  #255  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
We've been over this before. That's because the Pinnacle agreeement had nothing to do with the Delta MEC.
It still doesn't make sense to this Delta pilot that it was OK for the company to guarantee flying that exists as a Scope exception to another group. In theory, all flying that is permitted now, could be negotiated, and folded back in. Except for Pinnacle.

Add to that the fact we're being held to the "meet-and-confer" (albeit toothless) standard, and it doesn't seem in this case that Pinnacle was.

Not the strongest point for ALPA.
Reply
Old 09-09-2013 | 05:09 AM
  #256  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Interesting choice of kings because the name fits two people.

It may well be a false choice. Governor isn't even a good analogy.

In either case, generally those of us who stick around this board are well informed. Generally, as well, there are no fence sitters among us. Well, maybe there are in a way. In my case, I see the benefit of an independent union...clearly. However, my perspective is stylized and a little too pure. The reality would almost certainly be different.

Within Alpa, there are differences among the mainline carriers. The most recent being the unical merger. United brought their A game and continental played really sloppy. There wasn't wholesale slaughter, but as a really smart friend of mine once said, "some people need to be under the rule of dictators."

I hope we are not under the rule of a dictator.
Thanks for the reply.

Ultimately, all I want is us to bring our A game. I think imposing this power struggle, framed as a representation discussion, is completely overshadowing the discussion about how to best bring our A game, as a unified group.

This should be all about getting the best people in place, to effect the most intelligent actions. If this was a very tough debate about philosophies, and the future of constructive engagement, I think it would be very healthy.
Reply
Old 09-09-2013 | 05:25 AM
  #257  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
And the reason this is absolutely true is that the higher ups at the DPA are the higher ups from ALPA.
That's certainly not the case that I'm aware of. The current and former "higher ups" at ALPA absolutely detest DPA. If you have names of current or former ALPA higher ups that are in the current DPA leadership, could you please PM me those names? I'd be very curious if that were the case.

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Assuming DPA could be certified, they wouldn't be parachuting any new people in, would they? You'd get recycled ALPA people, who are in opposition to the current ALPA people. Say hello to the new union guy, same as the old union guy.
Again, I don't know of anyone that fits that description within DPA now. I could be wrong, but I don't know of any.

Originally Posted by Sink r8
One of my problems with DPA is that I find it to be a marriage of convenience between the NW MEC/admin people who have been edged out through the merger, and the former DAL MEC/Admin guys that lost to the current bunch.
The former DAL MEC/Admin guys that lost to the current bunch absolutely despise the DPA. Two of those guys are frequent posters here and they couldn't be more negative against the DPA. One was hired to consult on behalf of the United MEC for their SLI. The other is doing the same job he did for the DALPA MEC Administration for ALPA national now. I can't imagine who you're talking about that is now part of this "forced marriage."

Carl
Reply
Old 09-09-2013 | 05:31 AM
  #258  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
A great question Scambo. I think the answer is this:

The DPA argument is based on accepting the premise that King Lee represents the crown. In fact, our situation doesn't depend at all on our allegiance to him. We only depend on ourselves, and our situation is based on our leverage, our tactics (and our company's financial health). King Lee doesn't negotiate our contracts, or impose terms.
I don't know how you can say that given what Mr. Moak just did with regard to the Pinnacle Bridge Agreement. He signed it on behalf of Delta pilots without even discussing it with a single member of the Delta MEC. That single action negates your premise here I'm afraid.

Carl
Reply
Old 09-09-2013 | 05:43 AM
  #259  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
No, Carl they don't. Pull out your calculator. Top SWAPA guys don't make anywhere near as much as you do, and when you include our 14% DC, mid level guys don't make as much as our mid level guys, despite their 30 years of profits.
That's incorrect. Most SWA captains make more than I make. People often make this mistake because they don't know what's actually in the SWAPA contract. Many, many SWA captains make well north of $300,000 per year. I know two personally who've shown me their W-2's and explained how they got there. Add to that the fact that every SWA captain makes the top money (as opposed to Delta where top pay only applies to 34 out of 722 airplanes) and anyone can clearly see SWA pilots make a great deal more than Delta pilots.

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
For a short period of time, their payrates exceeded ours, but that era is over.
That era is still alive and well PG. SWA pilots make much, much more than Delta pilots.

Carl
Reply
Old 09-09-2013 | 05:46 AM
  #260  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Our M88 guys under C2K made more, adjusted for inflation, than UPS 747 guys do today, despite the fact that UPS's finances are much better than ours were, even back then. They're no industry leader. You need to make up better "facts", if you want to win this argument, Carl.
Now we're adjusting for inflation? If we redo this argument on the basis of being adjusted for inflation, Delta pilots come out even worse.

UPS pilots (represented by an independent union) are and have been one of our industry's leaders for quite some time.

Carl
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
Rogue24
Major
104
06-15-2012 04:49 AM
pksocal
United
25
05-23-2012 02:29 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices