Delta Representation Discussion
#241
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Keep up the great work Carl! ALPA keeps throwing their best Ninjas working under FPL at you and you continue to clearly win these battles. Nice to see truth spoken. Why do I feel a lot of the ALPA fanboys write to impress their superiors hoping for further advancement within "The Firm"?
Jack talking to Carl about FPL "ninjas"...
#242
You're right, I see that now. I talked about two incidents recently done by ALPA people...not DPA, ALPA. I think we can all agree that the incidents were pretty low blow type politics. In response to my examples, you said this:
Your response gave no opinion or judgment on what the ALPA folks did. Rather, your response was a question on whether DPA would be immune from doing something similar. The answer of course is no, they are not immune from doing something like that. I don't even know how one would acquire immunity from an action they've never done yet. You can only go by what's actually been done so far. Which is why I answered your question this way:
I hope this more directly and fully answers your question.
Carl
Your response gave no opinion or judgment on what the ALPA folks did. Rather, your response was a question on whether DPA would be immune from doing something similar. The answer of course is no, they are not immune from doing something like that. I don't even know how one would acquire immunity from an action they've never done yet. You can only go by what's actually been done so far. Which is why I answered your question this way:
I hope this more directly and fully answers your question.
Carl
My point was that we will almost certainly see similar behavior from the DPA higher ups at some point were they to be elected in. It's just how things are, and changing the union won't change that.
Thank you for answering directly.
#243
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Assuming DPA could be certified, they wouldn't be parachuting any new people in, would they? You'd get recycled ALPA people, who are in opposition to the current ALPA people. Say hello to the new union guy, same as the old union guy.
One of my problems with DPA is that I find it to be a marriage of convenience between the NW MEC/admin people who have been edged out through the merger, and the former DAL MEC/Admin guys that lost to the current bunch. For whatever reason, some people that participate in unions drift from simply looking at the best interests of the group, and start getting into the politics of the thing. Alliances, deals, horse-trading: it's all in there. I'm not excusing anyone when I say this: it cuts both ways. It's downright disgusting to the line pilot, but when you think about it, the closest look you get, whether it's into unions, or departments like Flight Ops, the more powerful the stench of politics.
#244
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
And I really do think it's good that we're discussing this here, vs. all over the L&G. Too bad that a lot of the thread is wasted on trying to personalize this, and having various people get into depicting one another's character (that cuts both ways also).
If all this is, is about people, and not ideas, that would be a pretty strong confirmation of what I argued above: this is really a nuclear option, in terms of winning a power struggle.
If all this is, is about people, and not ideas, that would be a pretty strong confirmation of what I argued above: this is really a nuclear option, in terms of winning a power struggle.
#245
And I really do think it's good that we're discussing this here, vs. all over the L&G. Too bad that a lot of the thread is wasted on trying to personalize this, and having various people get into depicting one another's character (that cuts both ways also).
If all this is, is about people, and not ideas, that would be a pretty strong confirmation of what I argued above: this is really a nuclear option, in terms of winning a power struggle.
If all this is, is about people, and not ideas, that would be a pretty strong confirmation of what I argued above: this is really a nuclear option, in terms of winning a power struggle.
In general, I agree with what you posted. However, was America better or worse off under self rule or under the crown?
#246
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
The DPA argument is based on accepting the premise that King Lee represents the crown. In fact, our situation doesn't depend at all on our allegiance to him. We only depend on ourselves, and our situation is based on our leverage, our tactics (and our company's financial health). King Lee doesn't negotiate our contracts, or impose terms.
I would argue that you are giving me a false choice. We have self-rule. This is an argument about who gets to be governor.
#247
You said they NEVER set the bar which is wrong. If you were referring to them not eclipsing C2k, while the rest of us gave back everything, despite being in the SAME industry, my response would be that we didn't give them a pattern up opportunity...which btw they did give us for C12.
#248
A great question Scambo. I think the answer is this:
The DPA argument is based on accepting the premise that King Lee represents the crown. In fact, our situation doesn't depend at all on our allegiance to him. We only depend on ourselves, and our situation is based on our leverage, our tactics (and our company's financial health). King Lee doesn't negotiate our contracts, or impose terms.
I would argue that you are giving me a false choice. We have self-rule. This is an argument about who gets to be governor.
The DPA argument is based on accepting the premise that King Lee represents the crown. In fact, our situation doesn't depend at all on our allegiance to him. We only depend on ourselves, and our situation is based on our leverage, our tactics (and our company's financial health). King Lee doesn't negotiate our contracts, or impose terms.
I would argue that you are giving me a false choice. We have self-rule. This is an argument about who gets to be governor.
It may well be a false choice. Governor isn't even a good analogy.
In either case, generally those of us who stick around this board are well informed. Generally, as well, there are no fence sitters among us. Well, maybe there are in a way. In my case, I see the benefit of an independent union...clearly. However, my perspective is stylized and a little too pure. The reality would almost certainly be different.
Within Alpa, there are differences among the mainline carriers. The most recent being the unical merger. United brought their A game and continental played really sloppy. There wasn't wholesale slaughter, but as a really smart friend of mine once said, "some people need to be under the rule of dictators."
I hope we are not under the rule of a dictator.
#249
FAIL. UPS and Delta are not in the same industry. We may fly similar airplanes, but that is irrelevant. Do you really think Taylor swift's limo driver makes the same as the guy who drives prom dates around in his own limo? Just because they both drive black limos doesn't mean they both have the same pay/benefits package.
The fail is either on you or we are in the same industry.
#250
We've been over this before. That's because the Pinnacle agreeement had nothing to do with the Delta MEC.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



