Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2022 | 03:38 PM
  #491  
New Hire
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy68
Things are constantly changing. I chose Mesa specifically because they were the only airline that could guarantee me a IAH base and the easiest commute which was the number one priority for me. I took the job job regardless of the terrible pay hoping I’d upgrade within a year or so (I have prior 121 experience) then Covid hit. Pay never improved and I’m in the process of bailing now because of the ****show of our training department. I flew with a new captain recently that took 6 months to upgrade at FO min credit, and another CA upgrade that got an engine failure after a missed approach and then an engine fire on the other engine a couple hundred feet later. Basically illegal to do that and purposely trying to fail him.

You can guess what examiner did that. The training department is in shambles. People failing “AQP” or recurrent training should not be happening as often as it does. I’m outta here regardless of the pay increase specifically because of our training department.
This is exactly why non AQP sucks... A checkride full of nearly impossible scenarios where you have more chance of winning the lottery than a double engine failure on a missed approach actually happening.

AQP is more standard and much better, depending on how the airline uses it. Some AQP airlines are just as worse.
Reply
Old 08-29-2022 | 06:27 PM
  #492  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: ERJ 170
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy68
Things are constantly changing. I chose Mesa specifically because they were the only airline that could guarantee me a IAH base and the easiest commute which was the number one priority for me. I took the job job regardless of the terrible pay hoping I’d upgrade within a year or so (I have prior 121 experience) then Covid hit. Pay never improved and I’m in the process of bailing now because of the ****show of our training department. I flew with a new captain recently that took 6 months to upgrade at FO min credit, and another CA upgrade that got an engine failure after a missed approach and then an engine fire on the other engine a couple hundred feet later. Basically illegal to do that and purposely trying to fail him.

You can guess what examiner did that. The training department is in shambles. People failing “AQP” or recurrent training should not be happening as often as it does. I’m outta here regardless of the pay increase specifically because of our training department.
Training failures = pilot retention

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 08-29-2022 | 06:57 PM
  #493  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 489
Likes: 14
Default

It’s always the training dept’s fault for failures in these forums isn’t it. Just like everyone in prison is innocent.
Reply
Old 08-29-2022 | 07:53 PM
  #494  
New Hire
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by golfandflows
It’s always the training dept’s fault for failures in these forums isn’t it. Just like everyone in prison is innocent.
He's got a point though. Double engine failure on the missed... What??

Also, there are definitely rouge examiners out there without a doubt. Maybe not Mesa ones, but other airlines (PSA, Skywest)
Reply
Old 08-29-2022 | 09:42 PM
  #495  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Plug
He's got a point though. Double engine failure on the missed... What??

Also, there are definitely rouge examiners out there without a doubt. Maybe not Mesa ones, but other airlines (PSA, Skywest)
Probably a sim mis configuration. Or an error handling the first that set the conditions true to trigger the second. But that should not happen on a check ride or it should be reset. But I might let it go a bit to see how it’s handled. But I’m not a sim instructor either.
Reply
Old 08-30-2022 | 03:50 AM
  #496  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Default

Talking about PSA airlines ...

https://casetext.com/case/occhione-v-psa-airlines

This case concerns a pilot in a First Officer position who, on two occasions, voluntarily applied to be promoted to Captain, but failed to pass the required basic flight skills test four times.

I've heard bad stories about training departments, specially from PSA, GoJet, and Breeze.

I just went through Recurrent @ Mesa. It was basically the same as AQP. Instead of a Loft, there are steep turns and a Cat II part of it now.
Reply
Old 08-30-2022 | 04:24 AM
  #497  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by golfandflows
It’s always the training dept’s fault for failures in these forums isn’t it. Just like everyone in prison is innocent.
When the failure rate for captain upgrade is 70%, something is not right. Either Mesa has some of the worst pilots in the industry or something is wrong in our training department.

Which is it?
Reply
Old 08-30-2022 | 04:53 AM
  #498  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy68
When the failure rate for captain upgrade is 70%, something is not right. Either Mesa has some of the worst pilots in the industry or something is wrong in our training department.

Which is it?
Your stats are wrong is the problem.
Reply
Old 08-30-2022 | 06:52 AM
  #499  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy68
When the failure rate for captain upgrade is 70%, something is not right. Either Mesa has some of the worst pilots in the industry or something is wrong in our training department.

Which is it?
Upgrade failure rate isn’t that high. It just isn’t. However I will say this: Some people shouldn’t be captains. They do fail. They take it as a gimme when it’s not. Poor ADM. This can’t be taught (well it can but we don’t do it). People don’t want to sit reserve. So they delay upgrade. Those recently upgrading are pilots who tried previously and failed. Their failure rate is higher. Crj upgrading into ejet has a high failure rate. Ca to ca not such a high failure rate. But I watch the failure rate and it’s not 70%. It’s under 25.
Reply
Old 08-30-2022 | 07:42 AM
  #500  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
Upgrade failure rate isn’t that high. It just isn’t. However I will say this: Some people shouldn’t be captains. They do fail. They take it as a gimme when it’s not. Poor ADM. This can’t be taught (well it can but we don’t do it). People don’t want to sit reserve. So they delay upgrade. Those recently upgrading are pilots who tried previously and failed. Their failure rate is higher. Crj upgrading into ejet has a high failure rate. Ca to ca not such a high failure rate. But I watch the failure rate and it’s not 70%. It’s under 25.
Well I was quoting a senior captain who told me the failure rate for captain upgrade was 70%. And a new Ejet CA (he was a CRJ FO) told me that the majority of the Ejet FO to Ejet CA upgrades when he was there failed because they weren’t prepared and thought they could skate through upgrade because they had been flying the plane for a while.

BTW, how do you keep track of the pass/fail rate?
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices