New Mesa Thread
09-23-2015, 04:04 PM
#1411
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,186
I got the impression that he doesn't want to raise our pay so he can use the low pilot cost as a negotiation tactic for contracts. Also, who the heck was that FA that called in and wanted instructions on how to find things on the company site?!?! Home girl has been sucking on the emergency O2 way too long
09-23-2015, 04:09 PM
#1412
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 138
Someone asked Robert Isom about a flow from Mesa (and XJT, and Republic) to American on one of the recently recorded town hall meetings. He said that if anyone wants to flow to American they need to join one of the wholly owned carriers. He also implied that if any of the other carriers could not fulfill the terms of their contracts there would be repercussions.
09-23-2015, 04:20 PM
#1413
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: 175 Left
Posts: 1,539
I got the impression that he doesn't want to raise our pay so he can use the low pilot cost as a negotiation tactic for contracts. Also, who the heck was that FA that called in and wanted instructions on how to find things on the company site?!?! Home girl has been sucking on the emergency O2 way too long
That's the chick I was refering to, what a nut job.
09-23-2015, 04:25 PM
#1415
Chief Engineer
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 815
Question: When you said they mentioned getting rid of all 50 seaters in 5 years did they mean that getting rid of our one 50 seater. Or the 50 seaters in the AA and or UAL side?
09-23-2015, 05:50 PM
#1416
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
He made several points about Skywest securing additional flying because they have 50 & 70 seaters to use as bargaining chips, and I got the sentiment throughout the call that JO has zero interest in operating 50-seaters ever again--pretty much killed these insane rumors of us flying 145s or 200s for AA/Delta.
09-23-2015, 05:56 PM
#1417
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: 175 Left
Posts: 1,539
That chick was litterally dogging Jonathan for personally answering emails? Like that's a bad thing???
It would have been a cold day in h$ll before Bedford or Heller ever personally answered an email at my previous employer.
That chick litterally has me irate... then goes onto ask why forms had been moved to different places on the website and where are they?
Who was that nut job????
It would have been a cold day in h$ll before Bedford or Heller ever personally answered an email at my previous employer.
That chick litterally has me irate... then goes onto ask why forms had been moved to different places on the website and where are they?
Who was that nut job????
Last edited by prior121; 09-23-2015 at 06:14 PM.
09-23-2015, 06:05 PM
#1418
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,186
That chick was litterally dogging Jonathan for personally answering emails? Like that's a bad thing???
It would have been a cold day in h$ll before BB or WH ever personally answered an email at my previous employer.
That chick litterally has me irate... then goes onto ask why forms had been moved to different places on the website and where are they?
Who was that nut job????
It would have been a cold day in h$ll before BB or WH ever personally answered an email at my previous employer.
That chick litterally has me irate... then goes onto ask why forms had been moved to different places on the website and where are they?
Who was that nut job????
09-23-2015, 06:47 PM
#1419
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: men without hats
Posts: 369
Nope I listened to the whole thing. In one of his answers he said they were working with "a carrier" on a flow through that would give our pilots the opportunity to fly "larger equipment". Everyone automatically jumps to the conclusion that it would be United or American. Think outside the box it could be an Allegiant type operation or not even a passenger airline at all or it could all be BS, but that is what he said.
09-23-2015, 07:01 PM
#1420
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: 175 Left
Posts: 1,539
Nope I listened to the whole thing. In one of his answers he said they were working with "a carrier" on a flow through that would give our pilots the opportunity to fly "larger equipment". Everyone automatically jumps to the conclusion that it would be United or American. Think outside the box it could be an Allegiant type operation or not even a passenger airline at all or it could all be BS, but that is what he said.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
