Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

New Mesa Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2016, 11:23 AM
  #3561  
sippin' dat koolaid
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: gear slinger
Posts: 982
Default

Originally Posted by RV5M
Pretty sure you get paid exactly the amount to which you agreed in exchange for operating an airliner the way you're supposed to. Flying super slow to get paid more is ridiculously unethical and makes you pretty sh^&&y at your job. I f&^*ing hate flying with those guys. Of all the weird, non-standard stuff people do, that one is definitely the most shady.
I completely agree, although I have only encountered one CA like that in my 1.5 years on the line. That seems to be more unique to another regional carrier...flying around slow and holding the pax hostage on their clapped out 200s in the 110 heat in PHX.
tinman1 is offline  
Old 01-06-2016, 11:55 AM
  #3562  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 580
Default

Originally Posted by 900drver
Hotel in SDF was robbed at gunpoint today. Welcome to Mesa Airlines.
What's your source?
Duct Mon is offline  
Old 01-06-2016, 12:19 PM
  #3563  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 519
Default

Yes, which? Nothing on the Goog about it yet...

Originally Posted by 900drver
Hotel in SDF was robbed at gunpoint today. Welcome to Mesa Airlines.
BobJenkins is offline  
Old 01-06-2016, 01:17 PM
  #3564  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by RV5M
Pretty sure you get paid exactly the amount to which you agreed in exchange for operating an airliner the way you're supposed to. Flying super slow to get paid more is ridiculously unethical and makes you pretty sh^&&y at your job. I f&^*ing hate flying with those guys. Of all the weird, non-standard stuff people do, that one is definitely the most shady.
Lololol...I'm fairly certain regional airline managements invented the term "ridiculously unethical." Not sure there's any way to apply that term to regional pilots flying by the book to generate a little extra overblock here and there.

There is no provision in the GOM requiring a pilot to fly faster than Cost Index Econ Speeds. There is no mention of flying/taxiing faster to "help the company out" or help passengers make connections--per the GOM you have the option of flying Cost Index Speeds from the TLR (that's NOT the number on the Nav Plan), or Econ Speeds from the ACARS (also usually lower than the number on the Nav Plan). There isn't even a requirement to fly the faster of those two speeds--it's "either/or." Read the breakdown in the GOM section on the Dispatch Release.

On the EJet, at lower altitudes and/or with a decent tailwind, cost index in the TLR report can be lower than .70. It's almost never faster than .78. Anyone flying .77 and up every leg on the EJet is likely not in compliance with the GOM. Anyone taxiing faster than "a brisk walk" is likely not in compliance with the GOM/FAA guidance on safe taxi speeds.

I do what is safest and I fly in compliance with the GOM/release/FARs. That generates a decent amount of overblock here and there, and should for anyone who is actually flying by the book.

Believe me--the company doesn't actually want you "please sir may I have another" types blasting around at .80 on the EJet, taxiing out at 30-40 knots, and doing "whatever it takes" to get the flight out and in on time. Most of the time you think you're doing the company a favor, "taking a look-see" with bad weather/runways/etc., you're actually doing something that'll get you fired or downgraded the second it goes wrong (and it will).

Get it out of your head that you owe the company anything more than what the manuals, FARs, and contract explicitly say you owe them--please.

Last edited by flapshalfspeed; 01-06-2016 at 01:38 PM.
flapshalfspeed is offline  
Old 01-06-2016, 02:02 PM
  #3565  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 52
Default

Originally Posted by Duct Mon
What's your source?
I was there - cops everywhere. Robber used a side door that didn't lock- so the hotel said.
900drver is offline  
Old 01-06-2016, 02:54 PM
  #3566  
sippin' dat koolaid
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: gear slinger
Posts: 982
Default

Originally Posted by 900drver
I was there - cops everywhere. Robber used a side door that didn't lock- so the hotel said.
File an ASAP. Seriously do it.
tinman1 is offline  
Old 01-06-2016, 03:19 PM
  #3567  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by 900drver
I was there - cops everywhere. Robber used a side door that didn't lock- so the hotel said.
Was the robber a Mesa FO? I mean...a man's gotta eat, right?
flapshalfspeed is offline  
Old 01-06-2016, 03:40 PM
  #3568  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 519
Default

Sometimes, the bonus is where you MAKE it, not where you take it. Go Mesa!!

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
Was the robber a Mesa FO? I mean...a man's gotta eat, right?
BobJenkins is offline  
Old 01-06-2016, 04:27 PM
  #3569  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 555
Default

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
Lololol...I'm fairly certain regional airline managements invented the term "ridiculously unethical." Not sure there's any way to apply that term to regional pilots flying by the book to generate a little extra overblock here and there.

There is no provision in the GOM requiring a pilot to fly faster than Cost Index Econ Speeds. There is no mention of flying/taxiing faster to "help the company out" or help passengers make connections--per the GOM you have the option of flying Cost Index Speeds from the TLR (that's NOT the number on the Nav Plan), or Econ Speeds from the ACARS (also usually lower than the number on the Nav Plan). There isn't even a requirement to fly the faster of those two speeds--it's "either/or." Read the breakdown in the GOM section on the Dispatch Release.

On the EJet, at lower altitudes and/or with a decent tailwind, cost index in the TLR report can be lower than .70. It's almost never faster than .78. Anyone flying .77 and up every leg on the EJet is likely not in compliance with the GOM. Anyone taxiing faster than "a brisk walk" is likely not in compliance with the GOM/FAA guidance on safe taxi speeds.

I do what is safest and I fly in compliance with the GOM/release/FARs. That generates a decent amount of overblock here and there, and should for anyone who is actually flying by the book.

Believe me--the company doesn't actually want you "please sir may I have another" types blasting around at .80 on the EJet, taxiing out at 30-40 knots, and doing "whatever it takes" to get the flight out and in on time. Most of the time you think you're doing the company a favor, "taking a look-see" with bad weather/runways/etc., you're actually doing something that'll get you fired or downgraded the second it goes wrong (and it will).

Get it out of your head that you owe the company anything more than what the manuals, FARs, and contract explicitly say you owe them--please.
I'm not saying that. Absolutely fly by the book. If it takes longer, fine. Slowing to 210 forty miles out or just sitting there for 15 minutes for no reason is another thing entirely.
RV5M is offline  
Old 01-06-2016, 07:18 PM
  #3570  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iFlyRC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,198
Default

Have you tried taxiing at a brisk walking pace? Hell to the no!
iFlyRC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
Past V1
Regional
6
06-23-2008 08:40 AM
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM
calcapt
Regional
17
12-27-2006 06:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices