New Mesa Thread
#3931
They mock for good reason. This flow carrot has been dangled in front of eagle guys for almost 20 years. Last week I had lunch with a friend that was hired at Eagle in 1999 and he was told then that he would flow to AA in 2 years. When I was hired at Eagle in 2010 I was told I would flow to AA in 2 years. The only reason there is a flow now is because of an arbitrators ruling. The settlement was 824 will flow to AA as a grievance settlement. Right now they're about half way through the 824. PSA flows are outside of a ruling. So far Envoy has not flowed a single pilot because of a labor agreement. If Envoy can't hire enough to replace attrition do you honestly think Parker will park brand new EJets to honor a flow in a labor agreement? Not for a minute.
I will believe a flow when I see it. Right now it seems that history is just repeating itself and still finding suckers.
I will believe a flow when I see it. Right now it seems that history is just repeating itself and still finding suckers.
#3932
They mock for good reason. This flow carrot has been dangled in front of eagle guys for almost 20 years. Last week I had lunch with a friend that was hired at Eagle in 1999 and he was told then that he would flow to AA in 2 years. When I was hired at Eagle in 2010 I was told I would flow to AA in 2 years. The only reason there is a flow now is because of an arbitrators ruling. The settlement was 824 will flow to AA as a grievance settlement. Right now they're about half way through the 824. PSA flows are outside of a ruling. So far Envoy has not flowed a single pilot because of a labor agreement. If Envoy can't hire enough to replace attrition do you honestly think Parker will park brand new EJets to honor a flow in a labor agreement? Not for a minute.
I will believe a flow when I see it. Right now it seems that history is just repeating itself and still finding suckers.
I will believe a flow when I see it. Right now it seems that history is just repeating itself and still finding suckers.
2. I'm a 2010 new hire and the only thing they told me was to expect to upgrade in about 3-4 years. Which, if we have kept the same amount of planes it was going to happen. I'm in the low 1400 and the JR CA in 2011 was about seniority 1750-1850.
So...I call BS on this one. A 2010 hire should upgrade sometime this year and we should flow in about 4 years at the worst case. (Unless they stop the flow of course)
#3933
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
They mock for good reason. This flow carrot has been dangled in front of eagle guys for almost 20 years. Last week I had lunch with a friend that was hired at Eagle in 1999 and he was told then that he would flow to AA in 2 years. When I was hired at Eagle in 2010 I was told I would flow to AA in 2 years. The only reason there is a flow now is because of an arbitrators ruling. The settlement was 824 will flow to AA as a grievance settlement. Right now they're about half way through the 824. PSA flows are outside of a ruling. So far Envoy has not flowed a single pilot because of a labor agreement. If Envoy can't hire enough to replace attrition do you honestly think Parker will park brand new EJets to honor a flow in a labor agreement? Not for a minute.
I will believe a flow when I see it. Right now it seems that history is just repeating itself and still finding suckers.
I will believe a flow when I see it. Right now it seems that history is just repeating itself and still finding suckers.
#3935
You where told you were going to flow in 2 years in 2010??? Jummmm I don't know why are you saying that, because the protected pilot settlement was in mid 2011. And a 2010 hire is not part of the 824...
2. I'm a 2010 new hire and the only thing they told me was to expect to upgrade in about 3-4 years. Which, if we have kept the same amount of planes it was going to happen. I'm in the low 1400 and the JR CA in 2011 was about seniority 1750-1850.
So...I call BS on this one. A 2010 hire should upgrade sometime this year and we should flow in about 4 years at the worst case. (Unless they stop the flow of course)
2. I'm a 2010 new hire and the only thing they told me was to expect to upgrade in about 3-4 years. Which, if we have kept the same amount of planes it was going to happen. I'm in the low 1400 and the JR CA in 2011 was about seniority 1750-1850.
So...I call BS on this one. A 2010 hire should upgrade sometime this year and we should flow in about 4 years at the worst case. (Unless they stop the flow of course)
#3937
Is PSA not flowing people? No arbitrated agreement, and they are taking delivery of AAG's new heavy RJ's. I have even heard PSA has had a tough time staffing CA's at times. Eagle did not have flow when I was hired in 2007. We have not had flow for 20 years, it was stopped after the flow backs. It resumed again with the arbitrators ruling in conjunction with AA new hire classes . 911/ and age 65 are what caused stagnation. It is a different time with different circumstances. If AAG does not honor its flow, it's regional infrastructure will crumble. A lot of time and money has been wasted to get to where we are today. Outside of a catastrophic event, you can count on the flow working
You are right. There has not been a flow for 20 years but there has been the promise of a flow. Very much like the sign that says "Free beer tomorrow!" All three of the guys I had lunch with said the flow was mentioned to them as a benefit coming to Eagle.
#3938
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
From: Captain
25 CRJ 700s are going away from United Express along with all Q400s and 40 ERJ175s to be add on to comply with scope
How many are going to be from Mesa ?
How many are going to be from Mesa ?
#3939
Covfefe
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
None. SKW is the only one parking 700s for UAX currently. Edit: not sure what you mean by the ERJ175 piece so maybe I am answering the wrong question.
Last edited by BeatNavy; 01-21-2016 at 09:14 AM. Reason: Edited because I don't fully understand that statement/question.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



