Captain/Captain pairing NetJets
02-02-2021, 07:41 AM
#42
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
Originally Posted by MinRest
So the company wanted 4.7, intending to never use it? Interesting negotiating technique...
02-02-2021, 08:20 AM
#43
Mmmm wine
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: A220 FO
Posts: 945
Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver
Could be they just want some contractual wiggle room. If they can whittle away to about 5.0 PPA ( which I think is the goal ), if they are suddenly hit with a rash of retirements or resignations, they would have the room to hire and train to re-fill the ranks without violating the contract $$$$$.
02-03-2021, 11:50 AM
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 201
Originally Posted by MinRest
So the company wanted 4.7, intending to never use it? Interesting negotiating technique...
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
02-03-2021, 11:58 AM
#45
Mmmm wine
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: A220 FO
Posts: 945
Originally Posted by hawkerpilot05
Some have speculated they wanted this language if they are able to slip in the retirement language for large 135 operators into law. This would allow them the wiggle room as they slowly hired. They tried last December but failed again.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
02-04-2021, 02:39 PM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 201
Originally Posted by MinRest
Makes sense. Also makes sense if they wanted to offer a retirement package.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
03-23-2021, 06:52 PM
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Airplanes
Posts: 1,378
Originally Posted by shrsailplanes
Thank you for the responses. I get it now.
captains get paired together on trips. So it makes no difference how many FO’s there are.
The new contract has made it so NetJets won’t need to hire for the foreseeable future. Only for retirements.
People don’t retire from NetJets until they are too old and weak to fasten their seat belts
Totally clear. I won’t be working at NetJets. I got it.
captains get paired together on trips. So it makes no difference how many FO’s there are.
The new contract has made it so NetJets won’t need to hire for the foreseeable future. Only for retirements.
People don’t retire from NetJets until they are too old and weak to fasten their seat belts
Totally clear. I won’t be working at NetJets. I got it.
Are you perhaps limiting your field of vision?
03-24-2021, 04:44 AM
#48
Mmmm wine
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: A220 FO
Posts: 945
Originally Posted by Macjet
I fly with a lot of ex-NJA/FLX and not a single one of them under any circumstance wants or would go back. Ever.
Are you perhaps limiting your field of vision?
Are you perhaps limiting your field of vision?
03-25-2021, 06:21 AM
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 201
Originally Posted by Macjet
I fly with a lot of ex-NJA/FLX and not a single one of them under any circumstance wants or would go back. Ever.
Are you perhaps limiting your field of vision?
Are you perhaps limiting your field of vision?
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
03-25-2021, 01:04 PM
#50
Mmmm wine
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: A220 FO
Posts: 945
Originally Posted by hawkerpilot05
It does go both ways. I fly with a lot of furloughed US Airways and American Airline pilots who elected not to return and stayed at NetJets. Another item is they seem to all say by far our union is run the best compared to ALPA and APA and our latest contract is just icing on the cake.
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
There is historical evidence to show where airline unions and ALPA have crapped the bed, hard. There is also clear evidence to support where NJASAP has done the exact same.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
