Ameriflight
#3261
You seem to want to argue what constitutes an employee based on semantics (and I appreciate the information about Eagle Jet FO) whereas I don't care who is paying him when we are discussing the perception on fair treatment. I agree - Eagle Jet FO is responsible for this situation, and it seems from this outside observer that AMF is adding to the problem by allowing it - especially when those interesting facts aren't available to the layman.
I think LRS summed it up very well:
They have a AMF photo ID and are .293 and .299 qualified to fly revenue producing runs. They log time under op specs. We use them to qualify for reduced minimum takeoffs. They wear the same uniform as captains
I applaud the fact based answer.
Would have been nice to have that on the very first response
#3263
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Left seat bizjet
Posts: 293
Ameriflight
And as the AMF apologists and the recruiting department talk about what a great place AMF is to be, the way that you are willing to justify the poor treatment of a fellow aviator like a lawyer in a courtroom should speak volumes as to the culture at the company.
I remember after a miscommunication with UPS led me to fly my run with no cargo on either end a certain base manager said something to the effect of "well we lost money, why should we pay you for the run?"
AMF has its benefits (TPIC) but don't think for a second that after the thrill of burning kerosine wears off it will be a good place to work.
#3265
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Left seat bizjet
Posts: 293
I don't think I ever said they were stepping out on their legal obligations, and if I did I spoke in error. However, I did say they are a crappy company who cares more about their bottom line than taking care of the people flying their airplanes.
Glad to see you finally aren't debating that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#3266
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Posts: 484
I don't think I ever said they were stepping out on their legal obligations, and if I did I spoke in error. However, I did say they are a crappy company who cares more about their bottom line than taking care of the people flying their airplanes.
Glad to see you finally aren't debating that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Glad to see you finally aren't debating that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by own nav; 09-23-2016 at 08:52 AM. Reason: typo
#3267
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Left seat bizjet
Posts: 293
Ameriflight
Lol ok. They are the same shady company as they were when I was there. How's that pilot problem treating you all? Good riddance.
#3268
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Posts: 484
#3269
On Reserve
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 13
Layovers are usually 6 hours ish. Some may be more or less. Again, these guys know the drill. They are here working hard for a better future. I haven't once heard an Eagle Jet FO complain about the situation. Not saying this because it's a good situation, rather, it's an opportunity for them to get where they want to go and they know it.
No one's forcing this upon them. More often than not I come back to base and see the FO's getting into much nicer cars than mine.
No one's forcing this upon them. More often than not I come back to base and see the FO's getting into much nicer cars than mine.
#3270
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
No, it is getting 1-2 year pilots big raises.
I make more as a 2 year FO working half the time than a 10 year Metro CA. I would hardly throw big raises out there like the entire payscale is getting adjusted, because it isn't.
I make more as a 2 year FO working half the time than a 10 year Metro CA. I would hardly throw big raises out there like the entire payscale is getting adjusted, because it isn't.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post