Search
Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Ameriflight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2022, 10:31 AM
  #5561  
Gets Weekends Off
 
QRH Bingo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 562
Default

Originally Posted by mwk627 View Post
Hey everyone. I'm a CFI over at a university flight school ready to move on and get some air carrier experience. I've been checking the application window nonstop to see if the FO portal has opened again. Its either Ameriflight or JSX because I committed to the United Aviate program and with the amount of time that I have I feel as though Ameriflight is a little more realistic. Anybody have any information on when hiring will pick back up for FOs? I kinda figure that the company has more of a need for captains since the majors are cleaning them out almost everywhere. Thanks for any info passed my way, I greatly appreciate it.
Originally Posted by FlightLife View Post
Not sure what this year looks like, but I believe they don’t do any new hire classes during peak season (Nov - Feb). If they have the resources, they may open up the application window; otherwise, might wait till Feb.
Additionally, they rarely post FO vacancies on public sites because they are typically always filled by UPS interns or other in-house candidates. If you are competitive, submit an email and résumé to their general recruiting email. Best of luck.
QRH Bingo is offline  
Old 11-15-2022, 02:42 PM
  #5562  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Nov 2022
Posts: 2
Default Pilot Schedule at DFW

Nowadays, What is the typical schedule like in DFW

Emb 120, Metro, 1900, and 99's.

I got an offer for metro- is metro a better pick out of three ? Is it single pilot most of the times
flyboy2022 is offline  
Old 11-16-2022, 07:35 AM
  #5563  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TeamSasquatch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 509
Default

Originally Posted by flyboy2022
Nowadays, What is the typical schedule like in DFW

Emb 120, Metro, 1900, and 99's.

I got an offer for metro- is metro a better pick out of three ? Is it single pilot most of the times
It is definitely the loudest out of the three! You will progress in seniority fairly quick, no matter what airframe. Is your end goal to get out as quick as you can get whatever flight time you’re looking for? I’d pick what flys the most and weighs over 12,500lbs, if you have the option to pick airframes.
TeamSasquatch is offline  
Old 11-16-2022, 12:55 PM
  #5564  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by flyboy2022 View Post
Nowadays, What is the typical schedule like in DFW

Emb 120, Metro, 1900, and 99's.

I got an offer for metro- is metro a better pick out of three ? Is it single pilot most of the times
Depends... 😂 And it depends yet again 😜
ON "typical" scheduled contract work you fly 5-2 or possibly 4-3 on a few runs, usually single pilot, but if working charter the schedule is more of a 3week on, one off, sometimes weekends off, typical with a copilot more often than not.
As for which flies the most... largely route dependant.
Some scheduled runs get a few hours a day, some less as "milk runs" .. charter work is highly cyclical ...busy months you max out of legal hours, slow months you might barely fly. So it's largely a lifestyle choice and where you want to live.
ZippyNH is offline  
Old 11-16-2022, 07:50 PM
  #5565  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Default

Didnt they just crash a Metro due to icing?
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 11-16-2022, 08:46 PM
  #5566  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 661
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
Didnt they just crash a Metro due to icing?
Try googling it. You should find your answer
CFIsoonToBeFO is offline  
Old 11-19-2022, 07:40 AM
  #5567  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,349
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
Didnt they just crash a Metro due to icing?
The report isn't out yet. No fatalities. The dogs survived. The only reason I know is I live nearby, so people ask about this as I'm out eating fish-fry with my family. I'd say "I don't know.". Then people would move on to some other pilot they know until eventually they find somebody with a pilot's license who likes attention. (Sort like all of us on this forum, right?)

This takes me back to when I was flying cancelled checks and later UPS-feeder freight in my twenties. There'd be an incident. Sometimes with the loss of a friend. Then I'd be drinking coffee at an FBO waiting for my freight, and I'd listen to someone over-simplify an event. If you're silent, it sucks. If you tell someone to be quiet, you come off as a nut and they find the next person who'll opine. If you start saying "Yes, but it's more complicated than that when you consider...", you wind up in a spot with everyone digging their heels into their preconceived notions of what occurred (This also happens on the boards themselves. They're composed of human beings with human faults and biases.). So there's no good option here. I'd just say consider the people involved, the pilots, the families, etc. and choose what flavor of bad you want to deal with.

I'd also say there's an ecosystem of people who capitalize on airplane crashes. There are the insurance companies, salvagers, lawyers, etc. There are also the people who use airplane crashes to gain local and internet fame and fortune. To do this they offer comments before the facts are out in an effort to get views and likes before interest in a mishap fades. Look at their initial commentary (if they left it up) around that MD-87 event in Houston last October. Worse these guys will frequently mention their qualifications as they do this. These people are nozzles. I am too. I just spray at these guys rather than mishap crewmembers and families.

There are some really good efforts out there to look at. Mentour Pilot looks at reports after the facts are out. He'll go into explanations around the systems, and make obscure reporting accessible to laypeople. I have to say that I really like some of the analysis offered by Paul Bertorelli too. Both of these people dig into facts which is less flashy and takes more work, then they make it accessible. So before we try to get incomplete and inaccurate lessons from recent events, why not get real information and useful lessons from better sources?

Also let's not be a jerks some crew who are dealing with a mountain of mud right now.

(Note to mods: I'm not sure if I can say "I like these folks" on APC. If you have to take this post down, I get it.)

Last edited by Elevation; 11-19-2022 at 08:24 AM.
Elevation is offline  
Old 11-19-2022, 10:40 AM
  #5568  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 443
Default

👏 👏 👏
Round Luggage is offline  
Old 11-20-2022, 09:32 AM
  #5569  
Gets Weekends Off
 
majorpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Position: Line holder
Posts: 513
Default

Solid post, Elevation! Well put. These “crash ghouls” need to put themselves in the place of the people affected by an incident before they get on their keyboard. Sadly empathy seems in short supply with some people.
majorpilot is offline  
Old 11-20-2022, 06:55 PM
  #5570  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Question

So what's the story? What caused the crash? Why did the Metro end up in the dirt?
SonicFlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mrsmith42e
Cargo
22
01-22-2021 08:14 AM
waflyboy
Cargo
3
05-10-2020 02:48 PM
chazbird
Part 135
10
07-01-2007 03:47 PM
beech_nut
Cargo
0
01-28-2006 11:55 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
0
11-17-2005 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices