PSA "Latest & Greatest"
#1072
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Solid language, that my friend is the language in the contract that spells out what the company can and can't do. Currently, our contract has a 92 hour limit for lines. You mentioned the company would slap 95 hour schedules on you? How would that work with the 92 hour limit we currently have? It would not and the limit could be lower under new language.
Under PBS, usually you have an average credit window. For example, all the lines added up together could average 78 hours under a 75-80 credit window. The contract states what the window is and the awarded average must fall in the middle of the window. If the minimum is 65 and the maximum is 92 there would be plenty of pilots in the middle, towards the top and right at 65 after the PBS award.
Don't forgot, you'd still have the SAP after the PBS award to further tweak and improve your schedule. SAP trades would become instant all the time too because less pilots would need to SAP.
You don't need one single piece of software to run all your bidding, trip trading and monthly schedule requirements. Mesa uses flica just like we do. They have different software to run their PBS and flica does the rest. Once the PBS award is done, the schedules show up in flica and flica is used for everything else including trip trades and SAP. Delta and Gojet use the same PBS software as mesa.
Under PBS, usually you have an average credit window. For example, all the lines added up together could average 78 hours under a 75-80 credit window. The contract states what the window is and the awarded average must fall in the middle of the window. If the minimum is 65 and the maximum is 92 there would be plenty of pilots in the middle, towards the top and right at 65 after the PBS award.
Don't forgot, you'd still have the SAP after the PBS award to further tweak and improve your schedule. SAP trades would become instant all the time too because less pilots would need to SAP.
You don't need one single piece of software to run all your bidding, trip trading and monthly schedule requirements. Mesa uses flica just like we do. They have different software to run their PBS and flica does the rest. Once the PBS award is done, the schedules show up in flica and flica is used for everything else including trip trades and SAP. Delta and Gojet use the same PBS software as mesa.
With regards to PBS what will actually happen is if I bid 65 hours PBS will ignore that request because, the average target line value needs to be met. So now I'll need to SAP to get to 65, which is fine except my 78 schedule will be full of 16 hour 4 days so SAPing 65 with any decent trip productivity will be impossible.
Your saying less pilots will need to SAP, but that's also what makes the SAP work. It is participation not just the starting open time that gets traded.
I don't think Delta, Gojet, or Mesa have a better scheduling system than we do right now, so why would I need to look to a company who has a worse system for improvements?
Last edited by Happyflyer; 07-29-2017 at 10:12 AM.
#1073
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Can't raise it to 12 or 13 days off because it will take productive trips away from senior pilots lowering their days off to catch up a junior pilot to get him to 12 or 13.
To an extent, min day and rigs resolve this issue which is why 100% of PBS company's have rigs or minday.
Unless the company is tossing out 5hour+ minday it's a consession. 4:15 is not an improvement over our 3:30 if it only comes with PBS.
#1074
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
So basically what you're saying is that we should never negotiate anything at all, because the company will just ignore it. Heck, lets just throw out the current contract and tell the company that they can do whatever it is they want, because we're sure they're just ignoring everything in our current contract and LOAs as well.
It's a weak argument by a person that doesn't understand the process.
It's a weak argument by a person that doesn't understand the process.
I'am saying that negotiating PBS for anything our peers have is short sighted.
RAH has PBS and SAP with holiday lock out. They also have $120 for captains and $50 for FO's.
Endeavor is negotiating rates based on their bonous going away.
Piedmont and Envoy don't have PBS, so there's no reason for us switch now.
It's too difficult to tell what the gains are worth for PBS, plus gains for the bonus's expiring, plus gains.
There going to sell us a package deal which is worth more itemized separately.
And the company has already informed TR were under contact and have no desire to open section 6.
Now all of a sudden you think it's time to get one over on the company, this thing is being completely rushed.
The fact that we're negotiating now shows you how short sighted they are. We shouldn't even sit at the table until Wisconsin is out the picture and all that flying is giving them headaches to place elsewhere.
#1075
With regards to PBS what will actually happen is if I bid 65 hours PBS will ignore that request because, the average target line value needs to be met. So now I'll need to SAP to get to 65, which is fine except my 78 schedule will be full of 16 hour 4 days so SAPing 65 with any decent trip productivity will be impossible.
Your saying less pilots will need to SAP, but that's also what makes the SAP work. It is participation not just the starting open time that gets traded.
I don't think Delta, Gojet, or Mesa have a better scheduling system than we do right now, so why would I need to look to a company who has a worse system for improvements?
#1076
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Straight up legit union question.
Section 25 A6 second sentence says "Sections and trips that cannot be placed into flying schedules will be placed into open time"
If there is enough open time in the SAP when it opens that an addditional 1-5 Rd1 lines could have been built, do the 1st-5th RD2 pilots have a legitimate grievance to have been included into RD1.
It appears the SAP pot is being opened with an artificial high amount of open time to increase the amount of RD2 pilots which are more limited in control of their schedule. I read the section to mean that if a RD1 line could have been built with SAP open time, it should have been.
Section 25 A6 second sentence says "Sections and trips that cannot be placed into flying schedules will be placed into open time"
If there is enough open time in the SAP when it opens that an addditional 1-5 Rd1 lines could have been built, do the 1st-5th RD2 pilots have a legitimate grievance to have been included into RD1.
It appears the SAP pot is being opened with an artificial high amount of open time to increase the amount of RD2 pilots which are more limited in control of their schedule. I read the section to mean that if a RD1 line could have been built with SAP open time, it should have been.
#1077
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 141
Well my friend the contract says 92 hours block not credit and I didn't specify. So your trying to show me up up with your "solid language" clarification isn't working so well.
With regards to PBS what will actually happen is if I bid 65 hours PBS will ignore that request because, the average target line value needs to be met. So now I'll need to SAP to get to 65, which is fine except my 78 schedule will be full of 16 hour 4 days so SAPing 65 with any decent trip productivity will be impossible.
Your saying less pilots will need to SAP, but that's also what makes the SAP work. It is participation not just the starting open time that gets traded.
I don't think Delta, Gojet, or Mesa have a better scheduling system than we do right now, so why would I need to look to a company who has a worse system for improvements?
With regards to PBS what will actually happen is if I bid 65 hours PBS will ignore that request because, the average target line value needs to be met. So now I'll need to SAP to get to 65, which is fine except my 78 schedule will be full of 16 hour 4 days so SAPing 65 with any decent trip productivity will be impossible.
Your saying less pilots will need to SAP, but that's also what makes the SAP work. It is participation not just the starting open time that gets traded.
I don't think Delta, Gojet, or Mesa have a better scheduling system than we do right now, so why would I need to look to a company who has a worse system for improvements?
#1078
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 141
Straight up legit union question.
Section 25 A6 second sentence says "Sections and trips that cannot be placed into flying schedules will be placed into open time"
If there is enough open time in the SAP when it opens that an addditional 1-5 Rd1 lines could have been built, do the 1st-5th RD2 pilots have a legitimate grievance to have been included into RD1.
It appears the SAP pot is being opened with an artificial high amount of open time to increase the amount of RD2 pilots which are more limited in control of their schedule. I read the section to mean that if a RD1 line could have been built with SAP open time, it should have been.
Section 25 A6 second sentence says "Sections and trips that cannot be placed into flying schedules will be placed into open time"
If there is enough open time in the SAP when it opens that an addditional 1-5 Rd1 lines could have been built, do the 1st-5th RD2 pilots have a legitimate grievance to have been included into RD1.
It appears the SAP pot is being opened with an artificial high amount of open time to increase the amount of RD2 pilots which are more limited in control of their schedule. I read the section to mean that if a RD1 line could have been built with SAP open time, it should have been.
#1079
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Key word there "current average", no one at this company for longer than a year thinks that is an historical fact.
#1080
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: e145 fo
Posts: 250
[QUOTE=Happyflyer;2401303]lol, yes in there 2015 contract there "testing" some stuff, report back when it works as advertised.[/QUOTE
Umm ok. Also JetBlue has sap with pbs. I've never used line bidding and I would love to have the conflicts with vacation, but I seem to consistently get better schedules then my buddies at carriers that have line bidding. I don't think pbs will ruin your life like people say.
Umm ok. Also JetBlue has sap with pbs. I've never used line bidding and I would love to have the conflicts with vacation, but I seem to consistently get better schedules then my buddies at carriers that have line bidding. I don't think pbs will ruin your life like people say.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post