Search
Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

PSA "Latest & Greatest"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2017, 09:17 AM
  #1071  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by Bonanzer View Post
Rah is currently testing a flica Sap product with pbs.
lol, yes in there 2015 contract there "testing" some stuff, report back when it works as advertised.
Happyflyer is offline  
Old 07-29-2017, 09:29 AM
  #1072  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by joseolay View Post
Solid language, that my friend is the language in the contract that spells out what the company can and can't do. Currently, our contract has a 92 hour limit for lines. You mentioned the company would slap 95 hour schedules on you? How would that work with the 92 hour limit we currently have? It would not and the limit could be lower under new language.

Under PBS, usually you have an average credit window. For example, all the lines added up together could average 78 hours under a 75-80 credit window. The contract states what the window is and the awarded average must fall in the middle of the window. If the minimum is 65 and the maximum is 92 there would be plenty of pilots in the middle, towards the top and right at 65 after the PBS award.

Don't forgot, you'd still have the SAP after the PBS award to further tweak and improve your schedule. SAP trades would become instant all the time too because less pilots would need to SAP.

You don't need one single piece of software to run all your bidding, trip trading and monthly schedule requirements. Mesa uses flica just like we do. They have different software to run their PBS and flica does the rest. Once the PBS award is done, the schedules show up in flica and flica is used for everything else including trip trades and SAP. Delta and Gojet use the same PBS software as mesa.
Well my friend the contract says 92 hours block not credit and I didn't specify. So your trying to show me up up with your "solid language" clarification isn't working so well.

With regards to PBS what will actually happen is if I bid 65 hours PBS will ignore that request because, the average target line value needs to be met. So now I'll need to SAP to get to 65, which is fine except my 78 schedule will be full of 16 hour 4 days so SAPing 65 with any decent trip productivity will be impossible.

Your saying less pilots will need to SAP, but that's also what makes the SAP work. It is participation not just the starting open time that gets traded.

I don't think Delta, Gojet, or Mesa have a better scheduling system than we do right now, so why would I need to look to a company who has a worse system for improvements?

Last edited by Happyflyer; 07-29-2017 at 10:12 AM.
Happyflyer is offline  
Old 07-29-2017, 09:36 AM
  #1073  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by joseolay View Post
PBS is a system of building and awarding lines. The construction process of trips is completely separate and would be no different under PBS.
Since it's seniority based the bottom 50% will have min days off because 100% of productive trips went senior, so the software keeps putting trips on you to get your credit up until it hits 11 days off.

Can't raise it to 12 or 13 days off because it will take productive trips away from senior pilots lowering their days off to catch up a junior pilot to get him to 12 or 13.

To an extent, min day and rigs resolve this issue which is why 100% of PBS company's have rigs or minday.

Unless the company is tossing out 5hour+ minday it's a consession. 4:15 is not an improvement over our 3:30 if it only comes with PBS.
Happyflyer is offline  
Old 07-29-2017, 09:52 AM
  #1074  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by 272922 View Post
So basically what you're saying is that we should never negotiate anything at all, because the company will just ignore it. Heck, lets just throw out the current contract and tell the company that they can do whatever it is they want, because we're sure they're just ignoring everything in our current contract and LOAs as well.

It's a weak argument by a person that doesn't understand the process.
TR said in a conference call that when they went for the captain bonus they tried to negotiate contract items. His words were they weren't open to that, and quite frankly they don't have to be, were under a contract for another 8 years.

I'am saying that negotiating PBS for anything our peers have is short sighted.

RAH has PBS and SAP with holiday lock out. They also have $120 for captains and $50 for FO's.

Endeavor is negotiating rates based on their bonous going away.

Piedmont and Envoy don't have PBS, so there's no reason for us switch now.

It's too difficult to tell what the gains are worth for PBS, plus gains for the bonus's expiring, plus gains.

There going to sell us a package deal which is worth more itemized separately.

And the company has already informed TR were under contact and have no desire to open section 6.

Now all of a sudden you think it's time to get one over on the company, this thing is being completely rushed.

The fact that we're negotiating now shows you how short sighted they are. We shouldn't even sit at the table until Wisconsin is out the picture and all that flying is giving them headaches to place elsewhere.
Happyflyer is offline  
Old 07-29-2017, 10:49 AM
  #1075  
BlueYonder
 
Pilot Sharp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: On Top
Posts: 258
Default

Originally Posted by Happyflyer View Post

With regards to PBS what will actually happen is if I bid 65 hours PBS will ignore that request because, the average target line value needs to be met. So now I'll need to SAP to get to 65, which is fine except my 78 schedule will be full of 16 hour 4 days so SAPing 65 with any decent trip productivity will be impossible.

Your saying less pilots will need to SAP, but that's also what makes the SAP work. It is participation not just the starting open time that gets traded.

I don't think Delta, Gojet, or Mesa have a better scheduling system than we do right now, so why would I need to look to a company who has a worse system for improvements?
Happyflyer you totally get it! You spoke my mind regarding SAP. Keep it up!
Pilot Sharp is offline  
Old 07-29-2017, 11:16 AM
  #1076  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Default

Straight up legit union question.

Section 25 A6 second sentence says "Sections and trips that cannot be placed into flying schedules will be placed into open time"

If there is enough open time in the SAP when it opens that an addditional 1-5 Rd1 lines could have been built, do the 1st-5th RD2 pilots have a legitimate grievance to have been included into RD1.

It appears the SAP pot is being opened with an artificial high amount of open time to increase the amount of RD2 pilots which are more limited in control of their schedule. I read the section to mean that if a RD1 line could have been built with SAP open time, it should have been.
Happyflyer is offline  
Old 07-29-2017, 11:21 AM
  #1077  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by Happyflyer View Post
Well my friend the contract says 92 hours block not credit and I didn't specify. So your trying to show me up up with your "solid language" clarification isn't working so well.

With regards to PBS what will actually happen is if I bid 65 hours PBS will ignore that request because, the average target line value needs to be met. So now I'll need to SAP to get to 65, which is fine except my 78 schedule will be full of 16 hour 4 days so SAPing 65 with any decent trip productivity will be impossible.

Your saying less pilots will need to SAP, but that's also what makes the SAP work. It is participation not just the starting open time that gets traded.

I don't think Delta, Gojet, or Mesa have a better scheduling system than we do right now, so why would I need to look to a company who has a worse system for improvements?
If your PBS award is nothing but 16 hour 4s, you need help bidding. The current average before trips get split is 20 hours for a 4. Plently of 4s credit 21+ hours.
joseolay is offline  
Old 07-29-2017, 11:24 AM
  #1078  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by Happyflyer View Post
Straight up legit union question.

Section 25 A6 second sentence says "Sections and trips that cannot be placed into flying schedules will be placed into open time"

If there is enough open time in the SAP when it opens that an addditional 1-5 Rd1 lines could have been built, do the 1st-5th RD2 pilots have a legitimate grievance to have been included into RD1.

It appears the SAP pot is being opened with an artificial high amount of open time to increase the amount of RD2 pilots which are more limited in control of their schedule. I read the section to mean that if a RD1 line could have been built with SAP open time, it should have been.
That open time is a result of conflicts from round 1 bro, nice try.
joseolay is offline  
Old 07-29-2017, 11:35 AM
  #1079  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by joseolay View Post
If your PBS award is nothing but 16 hour 4s, you need help bidding. The current average before trips get split is 20 hours for a 4. Plently of 4s credit 21+ hours.
Key word there "current average", no one at this company for longer than a year thinks that is an historical fact.
Happyflyer is offline  
Old 07-29-2017, 11:40 AM
  #1080  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: e145 fo
Posts: 250
Default

[QUOTE=Happyflyer;2401303]lol, yes in there 2015 contract there "testing" some stuff, report back when it works as advertised.[/QUOTE

Umm ok. Also JetBlue has sap with pbs. I've never used line bidding and I would love to have the conflicts with vacation, but I seem to consistently get better schedules then my buddies at carriers that have line bidding. I don't think pbs will ruin your life like people say.
Bonanzer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lolwut
Major
1144
09-18-2013 09:22 PM
Jared
Regional
1
11-03-2007 07:49 AM
DANCRJ
Regional
3
10-10-2007 04:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices