Could flow stop?
#11
I was just gathering info to try to make the most informed decision at this point. I realize everything could be different and understand the reason for the laughter about choosing RAH over PSA now, knowing that the industry has changed on a dime it seems.
Only skeletons, as someone mentioned, are checkride failures while getting both fixed wing and heli ratings (CFI/II in both). I almost wish I didn’t have my heli ratings and that would cut 2 fails off my resume, but it is what it is. Nothing I can do about them now. I have confidence in my ability but if I get weeded out of the initial interview due to failures, my ability then doesn’t mean squat because of primary checkride screw ups. Just need the chance to prove my ability over time of passing 121 checks at regionals.
AA isn’t really my number 1 choice. It’s probably number 3 after Fedex (IND base) and Delta (just because it seems like they got there stuff together).
I live 1 hr from Dayton and 2 hrs from CVG so PSA really is my best option. IND is 1.5 hrs.
Either way its a good time to be a pilot. I am grateful for that.
Thanks everyone for your response.
Only skeletons, as someone mentioned, are checkride failures while getting both fixed wing and heli ratings (CFI/II in both). I almost wish I didn’t have my heli ratings and that would cut 2 fails off my resume, but it is what it is. Nothing I can do about them now. I have confidence in my ability but if I get weeded out of the initial interview due to failures, my ability then doesn’t mean squat because of primary checkride screw ups. Just need the chance to prove my ability over time of passing 121 checks at regionals.
AA isn’t really my number 1 choice. It’s probably number 3 after Fedex (IND base) and Delta (just because it seems like they got there stuff together).
I live 1 hr from Dayton and 2 hrs from CVG so PSA really is my best option. IND is 1.5 hrs.
Either way its a good time to be a pilot. I am grateful for that.
Thanks everyone for your response.
But at the end of the day, you do what you feel is the right thing for your situation. I will say, our contract and work rules needs some improvement for sure.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 287
Of course, lots could change in a year and a half, but let's not misrepresent what's happening currently.
#13
For this gentleman, I don't see a reason why he won't be able to hold DAY, or CVG when its time for him to upgrade.
#14
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 47
That's correct, but I think things equal out by the time he is close to upgrading if he has no 121 time. Right now, things are out of wrack with the new bases opening up and forced upgrades forcing folks to do 2 leg commutes. But I do believe eventually, those guys will slide will be able to bid out of ORF back to CLT.Those who want to upgrade into ORF CA spots will and there has been a good number for guys/gals that are joining the company now for that ORF base.
For this gentleman, I don't see a reason why he won't be able to hold DAY, or CVG when its time for him to upgrade.
For this gentleman, I don't see a reason why he won't be able to hold DAY, or CVG when its time for him to upgrade.
#15
Banned
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
But even so ... couple months in ORF and you'd be back.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,045
It absolutely blows my mind that someone would allow themselves to be senior manned. It's not a mystery that it's about to get to you. Put in a bid and save yourself the trouble. You may not get the base you want(CLT, TYS) but it's gotta be better than ORF for 95% of those who are senior manned.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 449
This.....
It absolutely blows my mind that someone would allow themselves to be senior manned. It's not a mystery that it's about to get to you. Put in a bid and save yourself the trouble. You may not get the base you want(CLT, TYS) but it's gotta be better than ORF for 95% of those who are senior manned.
It absolutely blows my mind that someone would allow themselves to be senior manned. It's not a mystery that it's about to get to you. Put in a bid and save yourself the trouble. You may not get the base you want(CLT, TYS) but it's gotta be better than ORF for 95% of those who are senior manned.
They did so by signing an LOA that the pilot group was given zero notice of, and was never put up for a vote. They also allowed pilots to be Senior Manned into a closed upgrade bid.
The very concept of Senior Manning was one put forward by the Union not management.
So these days should everyone have their Captain bid in in order to try to avoid being moved out of base voluntarily? Absolutely, but it's ALPA and the MEC that put us in this position to begin with.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 469
PSA's Union negotiating committee and MEC gave up first officer seniority and allowed pilots to be Senior Manned and "voluntarily" displaced out of base most often into a two leg commute.
They did so by signing an LOA that the pilot group was given zero notice of, and was never put up for a vote. They also allowed pilots to be Senior Manned into a closed upgrade bid.
The very concept of Senior Manning was one put forward by the Union not management.
So these days should everyone have their Captain bid in in order to try to avoid being moved out of base voluntarily? Absolutely, but it's ALPA and the MEC that put us in this position to begin with.
They did so by signing an LOA that the pilot group was given zero notice of, and was never put up for a vote. They also allowed pilots to be Senior Manned into a closed upgrade bid.
The very concept of Senior Manning was one put forward by the Union not management.
So these days should everyone have their Captain bid in in order to try to avoid being moved out of base voluntarily? Absolutely, but it's ALPA and the MEC that put us in this position to begin with.
And to be fair to the MEC, we got 10/month at the same time. But how people feel about that is up to them.
As for Flow, if American decided to get rid of flow they’d have to pay something close to Endeavor rates to get people to show up here, which is probably in large part due to the Charlie Foxtrot that is reserve and senior manning. Ain’t gonna happen.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 449
I’ve heard that the NC didn’t have anything to do with the senior man deal.
And to be fair to the MEC, we got 10/month at the same time. But how people feel about that is up to them.
As for Flow, if American decided to get rid of flow they’d have to pay something close to Endeavor rates to get people to show up here, which is probably in large part due to the Charlie Foxtrot that is reserve and senior manning. Ain’t gonna happen.
And to be fair to the MEC, we got 10/month at the same time. But how people feel about that is up to them.
As for Flow, if American decided to get rid of flow they’d have to pay something close to Endeavor rates to get people to show up here, which is probably in large part due to the Charlie Foxtrot that is reserve and senior manning. Ain’t gonna happen.
More flow is certainly good, but with a silent Union that traded first officer seniority to flow to mainline faster understandably makes a lot of people uneasy.
#20
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Posts: 38
Travis told everyone that the senior man provision was their idea in the last conference call we had way way back when. It was recorded, and if you haven't heard it it really is worth a listen.
More flow is certainly good, but with a silent Union that traded first officer seniority to flow to mainline faster understandably makes a lot of people uneasy.
More flow is certainly good, but with a silent Union that traded first officer seniority to flow to mainline faster understandably makes a lot of people uneasy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post