Search
Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

Could flow stop?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2018, 10:18 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,427
Default

Originally Posted by Making it Count View Post
I was just gathering info to try to make the most informed decision at this point. I realize everything could be different and understand the reason for the laughter about choosing RAH over PSA now, knowing that the industry has changed on a dime it seems.

Only skeletons, as someone mentioned, are checkride failures while getting both fixed wing and heli ratings (CFI/II in both). I almost wish I didn’t have my heli ratings and that would cut 2 fails off my resume, but it is what it is. Nothing I can do about them now. I have confidence in my ability but if I get weeded out of the initial interview due to failures, my ability then doesn’t mean squat because of primary checkride screw ups. Just need the chance to prove my ability over time of passing 121 checks at regionals.

AA isn’t really my number 1 choice. It’s probably number 3 after Fedex (IND base) and Delta (just because it seems like they got there stuff together).

I live 1 hr from Dayton and 2 hrs from CVG so PSA really is my best option. IND is 1.5 hrs.

Either way its a good time to be a pilot. I am grateful for that.

Thanks everyone for your response.
Dude, if you are 1 hr from DAY and 2 hours from CVG, I'll go PSA hands down. Being able to drive to drive between both of CVG and DAY will be gold for ya plus they are both jr bases for us so you don't have to worry about being forced to upgrade out of that base too much to be honest.

But at the end of the day, you do what you feel is the right thing for your situation. I will say, our contract and work rules needs some improvement for sure.
Swakid8 is offline  
Old 07-22-2018, 11:23 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 287
Default

Originally Posted by Swakid8 View Post
Being able to drive to drive between both of CVG and DAY will be gold for ya plus they are both jr bases for us so you don't have to worry about being forced to upgrade out of that base too much to be honest.
Um...not quite. ALL the recent forced upgrades have been going to ORF. By my count, every last one of them from the previous three unfilled CA vacancy bids.

Of course, lots could change in a year and a half, but let's not misrepresent what's happening currently.
FlyingSlowly is offline  
Old 07-22-2018, 11:30 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,427
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingSlowly View Post
Um...not quite. ALL the recent forced upgrades have been going to ORF. By my count, every last one of them from the previous three unfilled CA vacancy bids.
That's correct, but I think things equal out by the time he is close to upgrading if he has no 121 time. Right now, things are out of wrack with the new bases opening up and forced upgrades forcing folks to do 2 leg commutes. But I do believe eventually, those guys will slide will be able to bid out of ORF back to CLT.Those who want to upgrade into ORF CA spots will and there has been a good number for guys/gals that are joining the company now for that ORF base.

For this gentleman, I don't see a reason why he won't be able to hold DAY, or CVG when its time for him to upgrade.
Swakid8 is offline  
Old 07-22-2018, 11:52 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 47
Default

Originally Posted by Swakid8 View Post
That's correct, but I think things equal out by the time he is close to upgrading if he has no 121 time. Right now, things are out of wrack with the new bases opening up and forced upgrades forcing folks to do 2 leg commutes. But I do believe eventually, those guys will slide will be able to bid out of ORF back to CLT.Those who want to upgrade into ORF CA spots will and there has been a good number for guys/gals that are joining the company now for that ORF base.

For this gentleman, I don't see a reason why he won't be able to hold DAY, or CVG when its time for him to upgrade.
You never know for sure but I would hope so approximately 2+ years from now.
Making it Count is offline  
Old 07-26-2018, 03:47 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingSlowly View Post
Um...not quite. ALL the recent forced upgrades have been going to ORF. By my count, every last one of them from the previous three unfilled CA vacancy bids.
Not convinced that would happen to someone who had a standing bid for DAY/CVG CA

But even so ... couple months in ORF and you'd be back.
ZeroTT is offline  
Old 07-26-2018, 05:39 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,045
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTT View Post
Not convinced that would happen to someone who had a standing bid for DAY/CVG CA
This.....

It absolutely blows my mind that someone would allow themselves to be senior manned. It's not a mystery that it's about to get to you. Put in a bid and save yourself the trouble. You may not get the base you want(CLT, TYS) but it's gotta be better than ORF for 95% of those who are senior manned.
ACEssXfer is offline  
Old 07-26-2018, 04:28 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 449
Default

Originally Posted by ACEssXfer View Post
This.....

It absolutely blows my mind that someone would allow themselves to be senior manned. It's not a mystery that it's about to get to you. Put in a bid and save yourself the trouble. You may not get the base you want(CLT, TYS) but it's gotta be better than ORF for 95% of those who are senior manned.
PSA's Union negotiating committee and MEC gave up first officer seniority and allowed pilots to be Senior Manned and "voluntarily" displaced out of base most often into a two leg commute.

They did so by signing an LOA that the pilot group was given zero notice of, and was never put up for a vote. They also allowed pilots to be Senior Manned into a closed upgrade bid.

The very concept of Senior Manning was one put forward by the Union not management.

So these days should everyone have their Captain bid in in order to try to avoid being moved out of base voluntarily? Absolutely, but it's ALPA and the MEC that put us in this position to begin with.
Approach1260 is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 07:24 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 469
Default

Originally Posted by Approach1260 View Post
PSA's Union negotiating committee and MEC gave up first officer seniority and allowed pilots to be Senior Manned and "voluntarily" displaced out of base most often into a two leg commute.

They did so by signing an LOA that the pilot group was given zero notice of, and was never put up for a vote. They also allowed pilots to be Senior Manned into a closed upgrade bid.

The very concept of Senior Manning was one put forward by the Union not management.

So these days should everyone have their Captain bid in in order to try to avoid being moved out of base voluntarily? Absolutely, but it's ALPA and the MEC that put us in this position to begin with.
I’ve heard that the NC didn’t have anything to do with the senior man deal.

And to be fair to the MEC, we got 10/month at the same time. But how people feel about that is up to them.

As for Flow, if American decided to get rid of flow they’d have to pay something close to Endeavor rates to get people to show up here, which is probably in large part due to the Charlie Foxtrot that is reserve and senior manning. Ain’t gonna happen.
272922 is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 07:53 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 449
Default

Originally Posted by 272922 View Post
I’ve heard that the NC didn’t have anything to do with the senior man deal.

And to be fair to the MEC, we got 10/month at the same time. But how people feel about that is up to them.

As for Flow, if American decided to get rid of flow they’d have to pay something close to Endeavor rates to get people to show up here, which is probably in large part due to the Charlie Foxtrot that is reserve and senior manning. Ain’t gonna happen.
Travis told everyone that the senior man provision was their idea in the last conference call we had way way back when. It was recorded, and if you haven't heard it it really is worth a listen.

More flow is certainly good, but with a silent Union that traded first officer seniority to flow to mainline faster understandably makes a lot of people uneasy.
Approach1260 is offline  
Old 07-27-2018, 08:04 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Posts: 38
Default

Originally Posted by Approach1260 View Post
Travis told everyone that the senior man provision was their idea in the last conference call we had way way back when. It was recorded, and if you haven't heard it it really is worth a listen.

More flow is certainly good, but with a silent Union that traded first officer seniority to flow to mainline faster understandably makes a lot of people uneasy.
Where might one find this recording?
maybe1day is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skyvector
Envoy Airlines
6894
06-18-2022 11:07 AM
PurdueFlyer
PSA Airlines
173
09-08-2021 08:26 AM
KingAirpilot90
PSA Airlines
1925
06-20-2018 12:38 PM
Skyler02
Regional
9
12-29-2014 02:00 PM
N927EV
Regional
245
03-28-2014 06:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices