PSA Questions
01-07-2022 | 02:06 PM
#61
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Not exactly true. Some of those new hires have already left class, so the 71 number isnt correct. Also, several that left were put on PER leave (not flows), and not sure why. Some pilots that left over a month ago are still on the list as well.
The worse part is that PSA traded lots of captains for new hire FOs, and lost a lot of Check Airmen as well.
The worse part is that PSA traded lots of captains for new hire FOs, and lost a lot of Check Airmen as well.
01-07-2022 | 03:11 PM
#66
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 433
Likes: 12
There is a guy that puts the lists into Excel, runs a sort on duplicates and removes them, and you are left with all of the names that appear on one list and not on the next. Shows all of the people that left the list. Pretty easy way to tell the "real" attrition. But then you can go in and look at the people that are already gone and still on PER leave, and others that left over a month ago and are still on the list as active, and you can see that the real number is actually a little higher.
01-07-2022 | 05:22 PM
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
01-07-2022 | 06:18 PM
#70
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 368
Likes: 4
Not exactly true. Looks like 58 gone, including the flows. Some of those new hires have already left class, so the 71 number isnt correct. Also, several that left were put on PER leave (not flows), and not sure why. Some pilots that left over a month ago are still on the list as well.
The worse part is that PSA traded lots of captains for new hire FOs, and lost a lot of Check Airmen as well.
The worse part is that PSA traded lots of captains for new hire FOs, and lost a lot of Check Airmen as well.
Thanks!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
