I Love PSA
08-27-2013 | 03:00 PM
#2022
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
As meyers stated, no one, save the 3 NC members really know what is in the TA. That being said I can't see it having any reductions in current wages. People around here, specifically the mid seniority captains were not very pleased with the rates in our current contract. I would have a hard time voting yes to any DECREASE in pay. I think it would be more along the lines of flying bigger aircraft for current rates.
As crappy and concessionary as that sounds a real, true, enforceable flow with solid language would bring a new dynamic to the situation for sure.
On a separate note, The NC was pretty steadfast in their strategy that signing something slightly less than an industry leading contract would open us up for the opportunity to grow, and for us to have better career expectations. They took a lot of flak during the roadshows for that. If this thing actually works out it would prove them right all along. Good for them.
As crappy and concessionary as that sounds a real, true, enforceable flow with solid language would bring a new dynamic to the situation for sure.
On a separate note, The NC was pretty steadfast in their strategy that signing something slightly less than an industry leading contract would open us up for the opportunity to grow, and for us to have better career expectations. They took a lot of flak during the roadshows for that. If this thing actually works out it would prove them right all along. Good for them.
There's no such thing ask eagle guys that have a flow.
08-27-2013 | 03:14 PM
#2023
Guest
Posts: n/a
08-27-2013 | 03:22 PM
#2024
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
From: GV Captain
So a pay cut, reduce rate is a better offer to fly "Large RJ's?
08-27-2013 | 03:26 PM
#2025
Guest
Posts: n/a
ah, RJ Pilot, there you are.
And I wasn't at the negotiating table, so I don't know. no one, including you believe it or not, know what we are being offered. hopefully we'll know soon.
obviously I am being mildly sarcastic, im sure our contract rates for larger airplanes aren't what we currently have in our contract for bigger airplanes, but im curious what there is in play. at some point, people have to be realistic about our future too.
And I wasn't at the negotiating table, so I don't know. no one, including you believe it or not, know what we are being offered. hopefully we'll know soon.
obviously I am being mildly sarcastic, im sure our contract rates for larger airplanes aren't what we currently have in our contract for bigger airplanes, but im curious what there is in play. at some point, people have to be realistic about our future too.
08-27-2013 | 03:28 PM
#2026
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8 100/300
Comparing B scale deals that you haven't seen? Anyway I do hope the flying stays under the wholly owned roof no matter who gets it.
08-27-2013 | 03:43 PM
#2028
Guest
Posts: n/a
08-27-2013 | 03:47 PM
#2029
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8 100/300
08-27-2013 | 04:09 PM
#2030
Guest
Posts: n/a
eh, don't know for sure, but from what I've heard we weren't offered anything remotely close to what eagle was. Not saying its better, just different.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
