Search
Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

I Love PSA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2009, 03:46 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 853
Default

[quote=deadstick35;556145]Air Wisc just gave USAirways a bunch of cash. IF the CRJ is to replace the Dash (on those great CLT-CAE and CLT-ASH runs), then I bet they get it before PSA.

Agree 100%
fullflank is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 03:57 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptKrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: LeftSeat PA-44
Posts: 528
Default

This is my first post.
CaptKrunch is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 04:18 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bradeku1008's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: CRJ 200/700/900 CA & Instructor
Posts: 658
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKrunch View Post
This is my first post.
Congradulations
bradeku1008 is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 06:22 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trackpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: CRJ FO no more
Posts: 463
Default

I'll love them when i get my job back...
trackpilot is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 07:10 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Default

Originally Posted by fullflank View Post
Agree 100%
It all depends. If AWAC already meets the contract mins then maybe not. At the end of the day mainline doesnt have to pay for PSA fuel buring two engines like AWAC does and other factors like they do for AWAC. At the day end money was given not as a good gesture but an investment. AWAC and RAH both will get money on their investment. Not meaning more flying by any means.

Do not look into this at all. PSA always updates this. Just now it got tailored to the current trends. Heck I HIGHLY doubt we even have a pool any more. To be honest I would be shocked to find out we do. Especially when we can get former 121 guys on property over less qualified guys. Who knows we do funny things here.
meyers9163 is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 07:19 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bradeku1008's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: CRJ 200/700/900 CA & Instructor
Posts: 658
Default

Originally Posted by meyers9163 View Post
It all depends. If AWAC already meets the contract mins then maybe not. At the end of the day mainline doesnt have to pay for PSA fuel buring two engines like AWAC does and other factors like they do for AWAC. At the day end money was given not as a good gesture but an investment. AWAC and RAH both will get money on their investment. Not meaning more flying by any means.

Do not look into this at all. PSA always updates this. Just now it got tailored to the current trends. Heck I HIGHLY doubt we even have a pool any more. To be honest I would be shocked to find out we do. Especially when we can get former 121 guys on property over less qualified guys. Who knows we do funny things here.
You still do. I doubt that it will be disolved since they are still taking resumes, Mesa is in a pickle and PDT will need to have some flying covered here shortly. I also agree with the above statement about RAH and AWAC, I bet Airways wants to keep contract company flying to a min. right now
bradeku1008 is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 08:15 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Default

Originally Posted by bradeku1008 View Post
You still do. I doubt that it will be disolved since they are still taking resumes, Mesa is in a pickle and PDT will need to have some flying covered here shortly. I also agree with the above statement about RAH and AWAC, I bet Airways wants to keep contract company flying to a min. right now
Let me say first and foremost I do not want a recall because PDT lost flying. That's their flying and if we do get flying because of their loss that's just unacceptable. I know they would say the same thing. Keep in mind AWAC/RAH do a different type of flying from PSA. RAH does longer routes that are not full enough to be Mainline. AWAC does a lot of DCA/PHL operations. PSA is much more CLT and a few planes in DCA/LGA/PHL. So if flying were to increase in PHL it'd be to AWAC and RAH. So if there's a need their flying will increase. I just do not see it being out of CLT.

I hope you have a job at some point. Right now I do not see all of our current qualified guys being back this year. Thus its hard for me to imagine we will keep a pool that long. Hell I have yet to hear anything from MGT since being on the street. And i'm number 5 from recall. Half my class is still flying. There's a lot to learn about PSA and management. We will run as thin as possible for as long as possible. Just how things run here.
meyers9163 is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 09:45 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

We are beginning contract negotiations, and things could not be worse here. Management is downright torturing the pilot group. They are trying to break us down. The battle is getting ugly. I won't post all the details on this public site, but management is making it clear that they have no concern for the pilot group and are going stand and fight any QOL improvements we try to gain. It will be a long process, and I just pray that our pilot group stands together and fights to win the improvements we so desperately need.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 06:07 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bassslayer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 375
Default

It's easy to figure out what PSA will do and not do. If it costs money, PSA will not do it. IF Mesa goes TU, I can see that flying going to the contract carriers. Airways has no interest in acquiring airplanes in this downturn.
bassslayer is offline  
Old 02-11-2009, 06:25 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bradeku1008's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: CRJ 200/700/900 CA & Instructor
Posts: 658
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76 View Post
We are beginning contract negotiations, and things could not be worse here. Management is downright torturing the pilot group. They are trying to break us down. The battle is getting ugly. I won't post all the details on this public site, but management is making it clear that they have no concern for the pilot group and are going stand and fight any QOL improvements we try to gain. It will be a long process, and I just pray that our pilot group stands together and fights to win the improvements we so desperately need.
Let me guess, they want PSA to fly the CRJ 900 for rates compatable to the 200/700
bradeku1008 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Theonemarine
PSA Airlines
67
05-16-2016 04:13 PM
SkyHigh
Leaving the Career
35
10-20-2008 05:44 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
6
10-02-2008 10:46 PM
alarkyokie
Hangar Talk
5
09-25-2008 03:01 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-19-2005 03:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices