Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Which Regionals will survive a recession? >

Which Regionals will survive a recession?


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Which Regionals will survive a recession?

Old 08-15-2018 | 02:24 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Aviat0r
I'm about to start interviewing with the regionals. I'm figuring that there will be a recession in the next one to two years.
Why are you figuring there will be a recession in the next two years? I am also considering applying for the regionals (Skywest or Compass in particular). I currently have a comfy desk job in the LA area making a good living and a great schedule. I left the airlines 14 years ago after everything went downhill post 9-11. I stayed current, flying GA, and still have my CFI. But that desire to go back to the 121 world has never left me. My wife (and 3 kids) are on board as well, since we've been discussing it for a year. We've been looking to get out of California, and this was our planned exit.

I hope I haven't missed the wave and I'm to late!
Reply
Old 08-15-2018 | 02:58 PM
  #22  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,148
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by sflpilot
If free ab intio programs were put into place I don’t think there would ever be an end to it. The cost of flight training is the main barrier for potential applicants. I was reading something recently about how 50% of the US population makes less than $27,000 a year. We also have a population of 325 million with 100 million of that out of the workforce. They changed the way they calculate the unemployment numbers back in the 90s to only reflect those that are currently collecting unemployment benefits. I didn’t used to think this way but I believe there are tons of people out there in not so good situations that would gladly get in line to be an airline pilot as long as it doesn’t cost them anything.
100 million out of work? Yeah, probably. Children, students, retirees, housewives, kept women, slackers, trust fund babies, etc. Do illegals count?

I think the actual unemployment rate is pretty low right now... most people who want a job can get one, although they might have to move out of some ex-industrial backwater. If they're waiting for the steel mill to re-open, might be a long wait.
Reply
Old 08-15-2018 | 03:06 PM
  #23  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,148
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by mcnitchell
Why are you figuring there will be a recession in the next two years? I am also considering applying for the regionals (Skywest or Compass in particular). I currently have a comfy desk job in the LA area making a good living and a great schedule. I left the airlines 14 years ago after everything went downhill post 9-11. I stayed current, flying GA, and still have my CFI. But that desire to go back to the 121 world has never left me. My wife (and 3 kids) are on board as well, since we've been discussing it for a year. We've been looking to get out of California, and this was our planned exit.

I hope I haven't missed the wave and I'm to late!
There will be some sort of slowdown eventually, it's inevitable.

The economy might just overheat and mush out for a while if nothing else happens. There's always the possibility of war or some sort of "black swan" event (ie 9/11) that might trigger a more significant downturn.

Baring a big catastrophe, I suspect the retirement numbers will mostly mitigate the effects of any slowdown on pilot career progression. You might stagnate somewhere for a couple years but that's probably the worst of it.

Yes the economy is humming along, but it's not showing signs of ridiculous exuberance.

My neighbor, who does residential real estate, noted a new paradigm.

In 2005, people were desperate to get on the speculative escalator before it left them behind.

Today, they are far more reluctant to buy expensive property, mostly only doing it for lifestyle reasons and only if they can afford it, not because they expect a windfall.
Reply
Old 08-15-2018 | 04:22 PM
  #24  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,253
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777

Yes the economy is humming along, but it's not showing signs of ridiculous exuberance.

My neighbor, who does residential real estate, noted a new paradigm.

In 2005, people were desperate to get on the speculative escalator before it left them behind.

Today, they are far more reluctant to buy expensive property, mostly only doing it for lifestyle reasons and only if they can afford it, not because they expect a windfall.
Yeah. Today the real estate investors seem to be more interested in finding something ridiculously dated but cheap that they can buy, rehab with mostly sweat equity, then use as a rental.
Reply
Old 08-15-2018 | 05:42 PM
  #25  
ItnStln's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sflpilot
If free ab intio programs were put into place I don’t think there would ever be an end to it. The cost of flight training is the main barrier for potential applicants. I was reading something recently about how 50% of the US population makes less than $27,000 a year. We also have a population of 325 million with 100 million of that out of the workforce. They changed the way they calculate the unemployment numbers back in the 90s to only reflect those that are currently collecting unemployment benefits. I didn’t used to think this way but I believe there are tons of people out there in not so good situations that would gladly get in line to be an airline pilot as long as it doesn’t cost them anything.
This filler
Reply
Old 08-15-2018 | 05:42 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 38
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
100 million out of work? Yeah, probably. Children, students, retirees, housewives, kept women, slackers, trust fund babies, etc. Do illegals count?

I think the actual unemployment rate is pretty low right now... most people who want a job can get one, although they might have to move out of some ex-industrial backwater. If they're waiting for the steel mill to re-open, might be a long wait.


You don’t know much about basic Econ then do you? The unemployment rate and labor participation rate are two different things. Unemployment, like explained above, only shows those employed or looking for work. Labor force participation shows those that are able to work even if they aren’t looking as well as what is shown in the unemployment rate. Yes it truly is about 100 Million people that are able to work but currently are not even looking for work. Not kids. Not retirees. Not disabled. If I remember correctly, 18-64 y/o.

The unemployment rate is very low, but so is the labor force participation rate. We should actually see the unemployment rate tick up whenever wages start to tick up. This should show more people entering/reentering the workforce to look for a job.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 08-15-2018 | 05:44 PM
  #27  
ItnStln's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Yeah. Today the real estate investors seem to be more interested in finding something ridiculously dated but cheap that they can buy, rehab with mostly sweat equity, then use as a rental.
I’m told there’s good money in that.
Reply
Old 08-15-2018 | 06:16 PM
  #28  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,148
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
You don’t know much about basic Econ then do you? The unemployment rate and labor participation rate are two different things. Unemployment, like explained above, only shows those employed or looking for work. Labor force participation shows those that are able to work even if they aren’t looking as well as what is shown in the unemployment rate. Yes it truly is about 100 Million people that are able to work but currently are not even looking for work. Not kids. Not retirees. Not disabled. If I remember correctly, 18-64 y/o.

The unemployment rate is very low, but so is the labor force participation rate. We should actually see the unemployment rate tick up whenever wages start to tick up. This should show more people entering/reentering the workforce to look for a job.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know plenty about it, but even so it's still mostly voodoo so I for one don't claim any predictive value.

If I wasn't clear before, I don't think there are 100 million people in this country who would like to work but cannot. There could easily be 100 million who don't because they chose to do other things... independently wealthy/retired, student, stay home with kids, whatever.

If you're talking working age adults, 100M is a very large percentage of working age adults. Rough estimate there are at least 100M kids/students + retirees in this country. So you're saying almost 50% of working age adults can't find work??? You're full of BS.
Reply
Old 08-15-2018 | 07:07 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I know plenty about it, but even so it's still mostly voodoo so I for one don't claim any predictive value.

If I wasn't clear before, I don't think there are 100 million people in this country who would like to work but cannot. There could easily be 100 million who don't because they chose to do other things... independently wealthy/retired, student, stay home with kids, whatever.

If you're talking working age adults, 100M is a very large percentage of working age adults. Rough estimate there are at least 100M kids/students + retirees in this country. So you're saying almost 50% of working age adults can't find work??? You're full of BS.
Reading comprehension is hard. You put words into his mouth (incorrectly ) then told him exactly the same thing he just said in different words as your "truth". At least every day you mis-construe and then argue some inane point with somebody on here. You must be a real joy to fly with. Other then that I do agree that 100 million sounds a bit high for working age adults. You are right it includes retirees and children.

Google is so hard for arm chair pilot know it all's. . Literally the first result.
The truth. https://money.cnn.com/2018/01/10/news/economy/95-million-out-of-workforce/index.html.


From the article.
-- 94.6 million people above the age of 16 were out of the workforce.

Of those:

-- 44.5 million were retired.

-- 14.5 million were in school or job training.

-- 12.8 million were taking care of a loved one.

-- 15.3 million weren't working because of an illness or disability.

In all, of the 94.6 million not working, 87.1 million were retired, in school, taking care of a loved one or physically unable to work.

That leaves 7.5 million people. What about them?

Of those, 1.6 million had looked for a job in the past year or wanted a job but had given up searching for more than a year. And 5.9 million workers listed "other" as a reason for not wanting or having a job. We don't know much about these workers.

Last edited by Fleet Warp; 08-15-2018 at 07:41 PM.
Reply
Old 08-15-2018 | 07:34 PM
  #30  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
You don’t know much about basic Econ then do you? The unemployment rate and labor participation rate are two different things. Unemployment, like explained above, only shows those employed or looking for work. Labor force participation shows those that are able to work even if they aren’t looking as well as what is shown in the unemployment rate. Yes it truly is about 100 Million people that are able to work but currently are not even looking for work. Not kids. Not retirees. Not disabled. If I remember correctly, 18-64 y/o.

The unemployment rate is very low, but so is the labor force participation rate. We should actually see the unemployment rate tick up whenever wages start to tick up. This should show more people entering/reentering the workforce to look for a job.
The current Labor Force Participation Rate is 62.9%. The record high was in 2000 at 67.3%. As a historical comparision, when they started keeping records in 1948 it was 58.6%. In 1980 it was 64.0%.

I looked up the definition of the population base the labor force participation rate is figured on. (Civilian Employed / this Population Base = Labor Force Participation Rate as a percentage).

If I read and understood it correctly, this Populaon Base is all from age 16-64. Included in this base are:
* Students not working
* Homemakers not working
* People in the Military (they are not civilian)
* People in Prison
* Drug Addicts not working
* Disabled and Handicapped not working (physical and mental)
* Etc.

* Early Retirees
* People who choose not to work/would not accept work for whatever reason

* Civilian Employed People (full and part time)
* People Unemployed but looking for work
* People Unemployed but Not looking for work (discouraged and any other reason)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skyshadows74
Regional
13
08-10-2018 09:00 AM
Moto208
Career Questions
13
06-26-2018 11:28 PM
TheWeatherman
Regional
20
08-10-2017 09:12 AM
Skyhawk92
Career Questions
6
11-23-2014 06:56 AM
robthree
Regional
13
09-01-2007 03:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices