Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Major Airline Hiring 2020 >

Major Airline Hiring 2020

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Major Airline Hiring 2020

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2021, 06:31 AM
  #61  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,322
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley View Post
Why would a staple even be considered when a company could simply add rj’s to their certificate and hire accordingly off of the street? It’s already their flying and they would have to own or lease the planes that they were to operate. A staple would involve longevity, pay, and integration issues. Simply hiring people as new hires eliminates all of that. I’d think that airline management would follow the path of less cost and less hassle.
Could they hire enough of the kind of people they want, who are also willing to start on RJ's for low pay and train them fast enough? Maybe.

Some people would jump at the chance to fly an RJ with a mainline number. A lot of the mil people might not sign up for that paycut, might just get some other airline job (or non-airline job, for which they are also marketable).

A turnkey arrangement allows rapid integration of planes & crews (FARs allow that without re-training everybody).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 07:59 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,222
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Could they hire enough of the kind of people they want, who are also willing to start on RJ's for low pay and train them fast enough? Maybe.

Some people would jump at the chance to fly an RJ with a mainline number. A lot of the mil people might not sign up for that paycut, might just get some other airline job (or non-airline job, for which they are also marketable).

A turnkey arrangement allows rapid integration of planes & crews (FARs allow that without re-training everybody).
My argument was that there isn’t a need for a stapler. The legacy company could simply hire the same regional pilots affected by taking the flying in house as new hires instead of a stapler and avoid all longevity or integration issues. Those pilots wouldn’t be 10 year regional pilots transferring over, they would simply be year 1 new hires just like any other applicant. No pass longevity, vacation accrual, etc. to deal with. Another option is always a legit flow type deal. After so long a regional flows up to a legacy and is treated as just another new hire along with military and OTS pilots.
Hedley is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 08:18 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 1,077
Default

Well rumor has it both AA and DAL might increase flow numbers at their WO.
Zerosilver84 is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 08:21 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,222
Default

Originally Posted by KirillTheThrill View Post
Where are they going to find the 175 sims?
Between SkyWest (owns the majority) Mesa, and Envoy, there might be a clapped out sim in Afghanistan we could utilize. How long will the process of buying sims and hiring instructors take? Probably years, time UAL doesn’t have.

What are the most pilots UA has hired AND TRAINED in a year. Now you have to utilize your already thin resources to hire AND train RJ types. Your answer to this issue seems simple, but it’s not.

I thought Rick had a great idea with the 2000 hours or at least 3 years of probation. Unfortunately problem pilots can get through with 1000-1500 hours of piston only. I’d carry that even if they bought out a regional. Once on property at UA they need to prove themselves for 2,000 hours blocked at UA before being removed off probation (or 3 years, which ever comes first).
This is all purely hypothetical and highly unlikely, but if a company like United were to take back the 175’s that they own, the regionals currently flying those aircraft wouldn’t need to fill those sim slots and they would become available for other companies to lease. SkyWest for example is a company that both operates and leases aircraft. If a legacy were to approach them with an offer to lease aircraft and sims, that could be a better deal than simply losing the revenue when the flying is pulled anyway.

Things are changing again. Some smaller markets are losing service while others are seeing larger aircraft. One very effective way to deal with a shortage of pilots, is to simply require fewer pilots. Instead of 6 flights on a 175, they get 3 flights on a 737. The shortage of pilots is an industry issue, not something only affecting a specific company. The industry will adapt, and I expect that adaptation to involve fewer flights, serving larger markets on larger aircraft. Another option would be a modern and efficient 50 seat aircraft. Embraer is talking about a turboprop, but what they are talking about wouldn’t fit most scope clauses since it has more than 50 seats. Either way, the clock is ticking, aircraft are aging, scope isn’t changing, and replacements don’t seem to be likely. What ever happens, we’re all just spectators along for the ride.
Hedley is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 09:10 AM
  #65  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Posts: 794
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley View Post
This is all purely hypothetical and highly unlikely, but if a company like United were to take back the 175’s that they own, the regionals currently flying those aircraft wouldn’t need to fill those sim slots and they would become available for other companies to lease. SkyWest for example is a company that both operates and leases aircraft. If a legacy were to approach them with an offer to lease aircraft and sims, that could be a better deal than simply losing the revenue when the flying is pulled anyway.
Those Sim slots would not become available. My reference is this, years ago Mesa was working on a 170-190 cert so they could fly UA 175 birds. SkyWest management bought out every 170-190 sim available to make JO’s operation more expensive. They had Mesa flying crews to Paris, it won’t be a simple as you say.
KirillTheThrill is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 09:11 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,099
Default

Originally Posted by KirillTheThrill View Post
Those Sim slots would not become available. My reference is this, years ago Mesa was working on a 170-190 cert so they could fly UA 175 birds. SkyWest management bought out every 170-190 sim available. They had Mesa flying to Paris, it won’t be a simple as you say.
Full disclosure: SkyWest was doing sims in Paris too at one point.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 09:31 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,222
Default

Originally Posted by KirillTheThrill View Post
Those Sim slots would not become available. My reference is this, years ago Mesa was working on a 170-190 cert so they could fly UA 175 birds. SkyWest management bought out every 170-190 sim available to make JO’s operation more expensive. They had Mesa flying crews to Paris, it won’t be a simple as you say.
If legacies (not just United) we’re to start taking back more flying and operate 175’s, SkyWest wouldn’t want those sim slots to sit vacant as internal demand diminished and would then make them available for lease. This is all just fantasy speculation since the legacies are not likely to take 175’s in house. UAX will keep all of the 175’s where they are and therefore utilize the training slots with UAX pilots. I think that the most likely scenario is that the regionals have all of the 70/76 seat aircraft that they will ever have and that they will simply shrink as the 50 seat fleet is phased out. UAX for instance would consist of 175’s and 550’s, while UAL covers everything else. Larger, more efficient, and comfortable aircraft with reduced frequency serving the most lucrative markets seems to be where the market and Kirby are taking us.
Hedley is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 09:56 AM
  #68  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,961
Default

“May you live in interesting times.” - attributed to an ancient Chinese proverb.

2022 (and beyond) will be known as interesting times.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 10:04 AM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2021
Posts: 50
Default

Originally Posted by Zerosilver84 View Post
Well rumor has it both AA and DAL might increase flow numbers at their WO.
Where did you hear that one?
Skybound12 is offline  
Old 10-05-2021, 10:12 AM
  #70  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,322
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen View Post
Full disclosure: SkyWest was doing sims in Paris too at one point.
This true, it was a good deal, especially if you prior time in type.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PilotAnalyst
Major
65
10-12-2022 05:31 AM
Proximity
Southwest
299
07-08-2021 04:26 AM
av8tordude
Major
41
09-12-2018 05:55 PM
AeroCrewSolut
Hiring News
2
01-26-2012 09:49 PM
edavis
Hiring News
22
06-29-2011 04:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices