Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Is the regional model imploding? >

Is the regional model imploding?


Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Is the regional model imploding?

Old 11-08-2022 | 06:36 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
You guys are missing the point. The hiring at the majors is going to slow. This is a temporary surge to replace the covid losses. It’s already changing.
Pangolin is right, a major has 1000 (max) retiring per year and they are able to train 2000. The airlines are absolutely replacing the covid early outs and catching up with retirements. The hiring will not be this crazy 2 years from now. Legacy Airline jobs will be harder to come by. Let's hope we get these contracts hammered out before that happens and we lose any shred of leverage currently held.
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 06:51 AM
  #92  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,253
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Throwitaway
Pangolin is right, a major has 1000 (max) retiring per year and they are able to train 2000. The airlines are absolutely replacing the covid early outs and catching up with retirements. The hiring will not be this crazy 2 years from now. Legacy Airline jobs will be harder to come by. Let's hope we get these contracts hammered out before that happens and we lose any shred of leverage currently held.
i disagree. Look at the order books for new narrow bodies at the majors. Then look at those at the regionals.

https://i.ibb.co/NNgmXx1/E504-F7-FA-...AB285-F4-D.jpg

Most current hiring at legacies only covers their incentivized early retirements for COVID.

The majors will need to replace their FUTURE retirees and staff those new aircraft while the ULCCs (including all the new kids on the block) and LCCs continue their own expansions. And the regionals have already nearly exhausted the DEC supply.
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 06:59 AM
  #93  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
i disagree. Look at the order books for new narrow bodies at the majors. Then look at those at the regionals.

https://i.ibb.co/NNgmXx1/E504-F7-FA-...AB285-F4-D.jpg
All those orders are not all growth. A lot are to replace aging fleets. Think about all the 757 and 767 delta and United are going to retire in the next 5ish years. They also have older 320 and 737 they are probably looking to replace by the time these narrow bodies roll in.
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 07:07 AM
  #94  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,253
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Justabusdriver1
All those orders are not all growth. A lot are to replace aging fleets. Think about all the 757 and 767 delta and United are going to retire in the next 5ish years. They also have older 320 and 737 they are probably looking to replace by the time these narrow bodies roll in.
Read their information for investors. Yeah, they have some old aircraft, but not nearly as many as they did before they trimmed their fleets during COVID. BUT MUCH IS FOR EXPANSION.

For the ULCCs and new majors like Breeze, it’s entirely expansion. Do some research.
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 07:57 AM
  #95  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Read their information for investors. Yeah, they have some old aircraft, but not nearly as many as they did before they trimmed their fleets during COVID. BUT MUCH IS FOR EXPANSION.

For the ULCCs and new majors like Breeze, it’s entirely expansion. Do some research.
United 200 aircraft order last year is not to expand by 200 aircraft more than half is to replace aging aircraft. By the time those planes come in in 5-10 years they will have plenty to retire.
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 08:37 AM
  #96  
pangolin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Reader
The problem there is that you’re going up against math with wishful thinking.

There is, by regulation, a hard cap on how much flying can be done. The number of captains is dictating where the cap is set. You talk about keeping the ball rolling, but what you describe is an airline forced to continually shrink. That is, by definition, not sustainable.

A few more obviously doesn’t equate to expansion, it equates to reducing the rate of the shrinkage. You need some more to get back to even. Expansion? That takes even MORE
Every fo you upgrade to ca IS more fo flying allowing more FOs to upgrade. Every fo isn’t starting at zero. It’s going to take some time to recover but it’s not a negative death spiral.
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 09:24 AM
  #97  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,253
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin
Every fo you upgrade to ca IS more fo flying allowing more FOs to upgrade.
No. Every FO you upgrade to CA is more fo flying hours ONCE THEY HAVE PAID OO BACK FOR THE HOURS IT TOOK THEM TO UPGRADE. If they upgrade after 1000 SIC hours at OO they won’t pay the SIC math model back until they have flown 1000 hours with an OO SIC at their side. If they stay in excess of that, their contribution can grow FO flying. if they leave before that, they are a net loss to the system.


Every fo isn’t starting at zero.
. Nope. But the vast majority do. And the vast majority of FOs who depart OO prior to upgrade never come back to become CAs for OO to be able to benefit in terms of upgrade eligibility to payback the experience invested in them.

It’s going to take some time to recover but it’s not a negative death spiral.
If you have more FOs than CAs, it’s a pretty good indicator a death spiral is already underway. Not a guarantee, but a pretty good indicator.
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 09:28 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,302
Likes: 2
Default

Another FO that upgrades is now just a Captain with his apps out…. Its a never ending cycle. The question is where do you get on and off the “lazy river” at the water park…
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 01:56 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Default

An interesting thought experiment is "Imagine the regional industry is stable then transitions to unsustainable pilot losses. What would that look like?"

Another thought experiment "If the regional model of February 2019 is not sustainable, is there a smaller model that is?" IE, how many ASM/year can be sold sustainably paying current labor rates and how many airframes does that translate to." If you assume the US can support, say two hundred 76-seat jets, what does that look like?
Reply
Old 11-10-2022 | 08:43 AM
  #100  
Cglyn's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
I’ve flown both of those jets and the 737 is certainly a less friendly place for a 1500 new to 121 pilot.
I would say no matter your experience, if you get the type rating you get the type rating and that’s the end of it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captkdobbs
Delta
1523
09-27-2022 12:29 PM
Precontact
Cargo
10
08-25-2008 09:06 PM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM
papacharlie
Regional
39
01-27-2008 05:01 PM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices