![]() |
Originally Posted by Bscalis
(Post 1262958)
For everyone complaining about pay be thankful that you have a job it can always be worse and many people are experiencing worse.
|
Originally Posted by 319wisperer
(Post 1261279)
However if you take the first available upgrade ( which looks like its running under a year), then you are where most FO's are pay wise at places like Skywest, Republic, XJet, etc where you wouldn't upgrade until 2017 at the soonest.
|
Originally Posted by 319wisperer
(Post 1261279)
Despite what many on this thread say, Lakes is really a great place to get your time. Does the pay suck? Absolutely, being an FO and especially first year is going to hurt. However if you take the first available upgrade ( which looks like its running under a year), then you are where most FO's are pay wise at places like Skywest, Republic, XJet, etc where you wouldn't upgrade until 2017 at the soonest. . Going to Lakes is a tough decision there are many CA's at Lakes who thought they would be gone by now but are still there. Heck the FA's make more than FO's on first year pay, contract talks are going now where currently. |
Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
(Post 1263144)
What you say is absolutely true, but it's also absolutely what keeps there from being good pilot jobs.
I have someone very close in my life who flew F-15's then went to AA. He has been an FO for 20+ years. No Captain because of the lack of growth in the company. Guess what? He loves his life and his job. He makes the best with what he has to work with. (which is significantly less than what he thought he would be making at this point) Anyone who thinks that little baby Great Lakes is keeping there from being good pilot jobs is mistaken. You can't say a BE1900 crew is holding back the industry because of their pay/QOL. The legacies don't give a care as to what a small turboprop operator is doing. Oh, and we don't take mainline flying away, as if that isn't said enough on here. Only thing GL does is produce some excellent pilots who are willing to make ends meet on low pay. But don't be mistaken, when the time comes the pilots at Lakes will make a stand for better pay/QOL. A good pilot job is one that the person who is in the seat upfront is enjoying what they do. I would say flying F-15's is a good job. I would say flying a 777 is a good job. I would say flying the BE1900 is a good job. They all pay you money, some more than others. Get over it. My .02 |
Originally Posted by MightEBeech
(Post 1263388)
Please, enlighten me as to what a "good pilot job" would entail?
I have someone very close in my life who flew F-15's then went to AA. He has been an FO for 20+ years. No Captain because of the lack of growth in the company. Guess what? He loves his life and his job. He makes the best with what he has to work with. (which is significantly less than what he thought he would be making at this point) Anyone who thinks that little baby Great Lakes is keeping there from being good pilot jobs is mistaken. You can't say a BE1900 crew is holding back the industry because of their pay/QOL. The legacies don't give a care as to what a small turboprop operator is doing. Oh, and we don't take mainline flying away, as if that isn't said enough on here. Only thing GL does is produce some excellent pilots who are willing to make ends meet on low pay. But don't be mistaken, when the time comes the pilots at Lakes will make a stand for better pay/QOL. A good pilot job is one that the person who is in the seat upfront is enjoying what they do. I would say flying F-15's is a good job. I would say flying a 777 is a good job. I would say flying the BE1900 is a good job. They all pay you money, some more than others. Get over it. My .02 |
Originally Posted by What
(Post 1263545)
Been negotiating a cotract for how long now, most people at lakes weren't on property when they started negotiations, sure to make a stand!
Anyone on here who has never worked a Lakes but has an opinion about working at Lakes is ill informed. Their opinion should be taken that way. If someone is interested in working here, then please ask any questions. |
Originally Posted by Pilotjay22
(Post 1263897)
Dude, you have no idea what you're talking about. It's a little more complicated than that and what you said is very disrespectful to our union leadership who have spent 1000's of personal hours taking care of our negotiations. Again, spread the hate elsewhere.
Anyone on here who has never worked a Lakes but has an opinion about working at Lakes is ill informed. Their opinion should be taken that way. If someone is interested in working here, then please ask any questions. |
Pilot Jay I have questions for you about working at Great Lakes. I can not PM yet. Can you email me at [email protected]
|
Originally Posted by What
(Post 1263936)
How long has lakes been negotiating for a new contract?
|
Originally Posted by What
(Post 1263545)
Been negotiating a cotract for how long now, most people at lakes weren't on property when they started negotiations, sure to make a stand!
I don't remember if it was before or after our current contract expired when we ousted those crooks at the 747 local who embezzled all our money (unity). We then voted in our current union(unity). Then, negotiations started for the flight attendants, as they hadn't had a contract for 9 years. These negotiations held up the pilot's negotiations for a big chunk of the time since our last contract expired. When the flight attendants hit an impass, they told the company they would strike and the mediator said they would be released. The company said they would park the 120's and just fly the 1900's. The mediator said he would also release the pilots since we are now in the same union (unity). The flight attendants had a new contract a short time later. Our union leadership has had over 50 negotiation meetings with the company and mediator. We have been waiting on the government for things to continue. If we get released, I think we will strike with over 99% agreeing to (unity). If your statement implies that we have no unity you are very wrong. Your statement that most pilots on property are new since the contract negotiations is wrong. If your statement implies that the reason we don't have a contract is because we have no unity, you are dead wrong. Considering the reality and circumstances of our situation, this has gone as quickly as possible. By what I can gather from your info, you have an interest in RAH. I have never worked there, have no idea what your union has gone through, and I have zero idea about the state of your unity. Therefore, I would never be so stupid or brazen to make a blanket statement of the affairs of RAH's pilots or union. Spread the hate elsewhere. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:06 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands