Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Express Jet denying Colgan jump seating >

Express Jet denying Colgan jump seating

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Express Jet denying Colgan jump seating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2008 | 09:11 AM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by STR8NLVL
You missed my point Saab. I have never, and will never accuse any regional of stealing mainline routes, which is why I used quotes. I totally agree that the blame for the current state of regionals lies completely in the laps of mainline MEC's for giving up their scope. But, regional guys at XJT, CHQ, SKW, etc have no business looking down their noses at Colgan or anyone else and saying that people there shouldn't have taken those jobs because it lowers industry standards when the same could be said for us.

Given where we're at now, the only real answer to improve wages and qol is for the MEC's at the union shops to hang tough in their negotiations and for the non-union shops to get a clue and organize. It's time we demand better and not settle for anything less than we deserve!
you are right, but we can look "awkwardly" at you guys for not VOTING ALPA, especially since your new "commuter clause" and a few other things that you are getting were created BY ALPA PILOTS. Make sure you guys Vote in a Union, this we we can all work together as opposed to crapping on each other
Old 04-02-2008 | 10:15 AM
  #42  
STR8NLVL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: 767 CA
Default

Well, you won't look "awkwardly" (sic) at me, as I'm no longer there. Moved to CHQ last year. But I was on the organizing committee and am still in shock that the vote failed. Too many complacent idiots didn't bother to vote.

I'm positive that it wasn't that they didn't want the union, just believed that the support was so overwhelming, no need to bother voting.

Hopefully, they'll get it passed this time.
Old 04-02-2008 | 01:20 PM
  #43  
flyguyniner11's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by STR8NLVL
You missed my point Saab. I have never, and will never accuse any regional of stealing mainline routes, which is why I used quotes. I totally agree that the blame for the current state of regionals lies completely in the laps of mainline MEC's for giving up their scope. But, regional guys at XJT, CHQ, SKW, etc have no business looking down their noses at Colgan or anyone else and saying that people there shouldn't have taken those jobs because it lowers industry standards when the same could be said for us.

Given where we're at now, the only real answer to improve wages and qol is for the MEC's at the union shops to hang tough in their negotiations and for the non-union shops to get a clue and organize. It's time we demand better and not settle for anything less than we deserve!
what i dont understand about people saying someone stole their flying is that dont we live in a capitalistic economy where free market forces decide business decisions? isnt that what competition and deregulation was all about?
Old 04-02-2008 | 01:21 PM
  #44  
flyguyniner11's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
you are right, but we can look "awkwardly" at you guys for not VOTING ALPA, especially since your new "commuter clause" and a few other things that you are getting were created BY ALPA PILOTS. Make sure you guys Vote in a Union, this we we can all work together as opposed to crapping on each other
dont look awkwardly at me i voted in the union it just so happened that some other people didnt
Old 04-02-2008 | 02:24 PM
  #45  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by flyguyniner11
dont look awkwardly at me i voted in the union it just so happened that some other people didnt
I don't, I actually think if your pilot group was comprised of guys like you, and DMEarc, The Juice too etc...... Colgan would be a much better place

Last edited by JoeyMeatballs; 04-02-2008 at 02:44 PM.
Old 04-02-2008 | 02:32 PM
  #46  
The Juice's Avatar
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Default

I can understand the frustration with XJet and Colgan being given their flying, notice I said given and not taken.

I am pretty positive, say 95% a union will be voted in if ALPA has another drive with the Colgan OC. Nothing has changed for the better so I do not see any "yes" votes changing. Also, those who were too lazy to vote with their "what does one vote matter" mentality will realize this time what one vote does matter. Also, I am sure Colgan has upset more people over this last year who used to be a "no" vote and they will be a "yes" vote.

We have had quite a few base closures this last year and displaced pilots are not happy pilots. Plus take a happy Colgan pilot flying out of ROC who is home everynight, happy guy who sees no need for a union. Now tell him his base has closed and now he has to commute to his new base in LGA or IAD and see how happy he is when the vote comes up.

The key will be educate. Since Colgan has a lot of new pilots on the line who do not know the truth it is up to the more experienced guys to teach them. This is what must happen to help them understand the importance. I know I will be taking many new FO's aside and having a heart to heart about why we must vote in a union.

As I said 95%
Old 04-02-2008 | 02:36 PM
  #47  
Moose Surgeon's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: SAAB 340
Default

Wow after that you definatly have my vote!!!
Old 04-02-2008 | 02:54 PM
  #48  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: Airbus F/O
Default

Originally Posted by STR8NLVL
You missed my point Saab. I have never, and will never accuse any regional of stealing mainline routes, which is why I used quotes. I totally agree that the blame for the current state of regionals lies completely in the laps of mainline MEC's for giving up their scope. But, regional guys at XJT, CHQ, SKW, etc have no business looking down their noses at Colgan or anyone else and saying that people there shouldn't have taken those jobs because it lowers industry standards when the same could be said for us.

Given where we're at now, the only real answer to improve wages and qol is for the MEC's at the union shops to hang tough in their negotiations and for the non-union shops to get a clue and organize. It's time we demand better and not settle for anything less than we deserve!
Exactly. I guess if you really look at it the other way, everyone that has taken a job flying RJs at regional pay have done the most harm to the industry compared to us flying props and keeping our flying truly regional. If no one would have taken the RJ jobs at these wonderful companies, then the mainlines would have been force to do the flying at mainline wages. So in reality who do you think has hurt the industry more?????? I don't think is us at Colgan.
Old 04-02-2008 | 03:04 PM
  #49  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: Airbus F/O
Default

Again if you did not do a single thing to get your union, then please shut up about us not getting ALPA on our first try!!! And don't even think about looking awkwardly at us. You have not a single right to criticize, you felt into a union company and like most of us, you probably didn't know much about the industry when you took your first job, or the true importance of a union. I couldn't even vote because I was a new hire.

I do feel that this time around we will have it.

Now back on topic, it's good to see that there only seems to be isolated cases of being denied a jumpseat and that the two pilot groups are getting along. I have never seen any capt I fly with deny anyone a seat.
Old 04-02-2008 | 03:08 PM
  #50  
HookEm's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: 170 FO
Default

Originally Posted by phoenix 23684
Exactly. I guess if you really look at it the other way, everyone that has taken a job flying RJs at regional pay have done the most harm to the industry compared to us flying props and keeping our flying truly regional. If no one would have taken the RJ jobs at these wonderful companies, then the mainlines would have been force to do the flying at mainline wages. So in reality who do you think has hurt the industry more?????? I don't think is us at Colgan.
Easy there... deep breath. A free market opens itself up to all of these changes. I flew turboprops, I now fly a jet (not for a mainline) I'm not going to blame a 20 year old for what I get paid now. I knew plenty of CFI's that couldn't wait to go to Xjet, even more that took the job at Colgan. I don't blame anyone that takes a job they are qualified for. Mainline determines what company flies what routes. Many excuses could be made for the amount of pay... i.e. Fuel, Equipement, Company, Deregulation...etc. I understand hostility against comapanies, but mom and dad determine who gets dessert at the end of the day not the union or lack there of.

As far as jumpseat is concerned, we are all trying to get to work or get home at the end of the day. Who gives a good gad damn who is sitting in the back of the plane. I'm here because I love to fly airplanes, not to make a million dollars
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
USMCFLYR
Major
14
03-24-2008 07:30 PM
Fly Navy
Regional
17
03-18-2008 05:27 PM
Fly Navy
Regional
6
03-14-2008 10:43 PM
maveric311
Regional
31
12-14-2007 01:30 AM
tsuchiym
Regional
8
11-13-2005 01:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices