PDT News and Rumors
09-14-2016, 07:30 AM
#9291
Happy at PDT
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: EMB-145 CA
Posts: 983
Originally Posted by wiz5422
Our MECs are weak. Should of took the leverage we have for more sustainable QOL increases.
....ENVOY pilot here.
....ENVOY pilot here.
09-14-2016, 07:33 AM
#9292
Happy at PDT
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: EMB-145 CA
Posts: 983
Originally Posted by ajm757
So are they taking it? Would look really bad for PDT if the other two have much higher pay. Good luck getting bigger classes.
09-14-2016, 07:52 AM
#9293
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 634
Originally Posted by Lvlng4Spd
I think we have to at this point. If we don't I'd like to see a recall vote, as they will be killing recruitment. I understand the principle involved, but it doesn't work when your siblings already agreed to the terms.
09-14-2016, 07:52 AM
#9294
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 354
Originally Posted by Lvlng4Spd
We better take it. It looks like Envoy is already advertising it and I'm quite sure PSA will take it too. We will be at a huge disadvantage...speaking of which, where is my ****ing IPad??? 
09-14-2016, 09:20 AM
#9298
Mx Delay
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 137
Piedmont has announced nothing, and our union has been silent on the matter. I completely understand the whole "benefit the entire pilot group argument", but let's not forget that FOs are only on a 4 year pay scale which, under the proposed plan, tops out at ~$40/hr. Captain pay in the jet tops out at $87 on a 12-year scale.
I'm also operating under the assumption that current FOs would not be eligible for the retention bonus since our union (smartly) turned down the retention bonus earlier this year /s.
I'm also operating under the assumption that current FOs would not be eligible for the retention bonus since our union (smartly) turned down the retention bonus earlier this year /s.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
