Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Up and Out Policies: Upgrade >

Up and Out Policies: Upgrade

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Up and Out Policies: Upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2008 | 06:47 AM
  #91  
EmbraerFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
TW - It seems to me that you fall under 11(c) and NOT under 11(a).

11(a) makes it sound like if you were an RJ FO upgrading to CA on an RJ and failed then you would be terminated.
11(c) makes it sound like if you were an RJ FO transitioning and upgrading to be a CA on the EMB-120 may elect to return to their previous position (the RJ for you) and frozen for 12 month.

What am I misreading here?

USMCFLYR
That's how i see it too
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 07:03 AM
  #92  
Blank's Avatar
New Hire
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: CRJ, Left
Default

USMCFLYR:

Transition does not equal upgrade.
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 07:09 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Satan's Camaro
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
TW - It seems to me that you fall under 11(c) and NOT under 11(a).

11(a) makes it sound like if you were an RJ FO upgrading to CA on an RJ and failed then you would be terminated.
11(c) makes it sound like if you were an RJ FO transitioning and upgrading to be a CA on the EMB-120, they may elect to return to their previous position (the RJ for you) and frozen for 12 months.

What am I misreading here?

USMCFLYR
Unfortunately, you have them mixed up. Any FO to any CA is upgrade training, which would fall under 11a. 11c is a little more complicated, since if I remember correctly, it barely even applies to SKW. SKW, I believe, trains all it's jet captains on all of its jets (since they're all CRJs) and gives you differences trainings. However, let's pretend that they only trained you on the CRJ200, and you would have to bid a CRJ700 slot. The training to the CR7 would be transition training.

To summarize, upgrade training=upgrading to a CA position that you don't already have a class of ATP for.

Transition training=upgrading from one jet to another jet or one turboprop to another turboprop (well, I might stand corrected on this, not sure if they're treated differently). To give another example; if SKW got 170s and a jet CA bidded a 170 CA slot, he/she would go under transition training.
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 07:43 AM
  #94  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by reelbigchair
If it would change the policy, sign me up......

However, when I learned of Tony's situation, and I began talking to my captains about the policy, I learned that the vast majority of them support the policy. (Again an unscientific poll of ORD based capts.)
And being that ALPA at each airline, is run by that airline's pilots, I feel fairly certain that this paticular policy would stick. The airline for whatever reason likes it, and unfortunately a large sector of our pilots support it.
My own unscientific poll revealed that about 50% of captains support it, and about 0% of FO's. I think the policy could even be changed now if the pilot group asked SAPA to push for that.

Some of the older captains did not have up-or-out when they upgraded, and many don't see the need for it.

I think the correct solution is to hire for captains in the first place, and if a few ringers slip through (they will) let 'em stay in the right seat if they want...I suspect many would eventually find another career anyway rather than remain a lifer regional FO
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 07:43 AM
  #95  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 441
Likes: 15
From: 30 West
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
[U]

c) Pilots who fail an oral examination (either FAA or Company) will be
trained to proficiency and given another oral.

11) Pilots, who are unable to satisfactorily complete the additional training or pass a third simulator/flight check, or are not recommended for a flight
check after the additional training is complete, will be treated as follows:


Tony,

The reason I think you have a case is that while SKW may have the right to fire you after they give you additional training, in your case they elected to terminate you without any additional training. Going from an oral check to a simulator check does not constitute training. I still do not think they followed their own policy.

The other point I have is if they decide they no longer want you working for them, and have the right to dismiss you as an at will employee, it does not give them the right to destroy your career opportunities in the rest of the industry.
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 07:46 AM
  #96  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by Blank
USMCFLYR:

Transition does not equal upgrade.
I think I understand this.
I understand that you could TRANSITION from an FO on a CRJ to an FO on a EMB-120. In the military I would call TRANSITION from a F-14 to a F/A-18 - transitioning to a different airframe.

Upgrading to me means moving from a FO position to a Captain position.
Again - military analogy - moving from wingman to section lead.

So.......11 (c):
Pilots, who are undergoing transition training for a captain or first
officer position, may elect to return to their previous position for
which he/she was qualified and be frozen for a period of twelve (12)
months.
makes it sounds like a FO who is UPGRADING to CAPTAIN and TRANSITIONING to a different airframe would fall under this paragraph.

RJ FO upgrading to CA and transitioning from RJ to EMB-120 would be covered here.
Military analogy - F-14 wingman upgrading to a flight lead right after he has transitioned to the Hornet.

OK - long post - but please point out where I have misunderstood the airline model.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 07:51 AM
  #97  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

[QUOTE]
Originally Posted by boilerpilot
Unfortunately, you have them mixed up. Any FO to any CA is upgrade training, which would fall under 11a.
I do see the upgrade training here but it doesn't say anything about transitioning like 11(c) does - which is why I said that if upgrading with no other transition (except differences training for example) I could understand it - though not agree with it. I don't know.

11c is a little more complicated, since if I remember correctly, it barely even applies to SKW. SKW, I believe, trains all it's jet captains on all of its jets (since they're all CRJs) and gives you differences trainings. However, let's pretend that they only trained you on the CRJ200, and you would have to bid a CRJ700 slot. The training to the CR7 would be transition training.
But he moved from one airframe to another airframe - which was upgrading and transitioning. Doesn't his situation fall more in line with 11(c)

To summarize, upgrade training=upgrading to a CA position that you don't already have a class of ATP for.
Yep - got this I'm pretty sure. very similar.

Transition training=upgrading from one jet to another jet or one turboprop to another turboprop
OR CRJ TO TURBOPROP RIGHT?

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 07:52 AM
  #98  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,149
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
I think I understand this.
I understand that you could TRANSITION from an FO on a CRJ to an FO on a EMB-120. In the military I would call TRANSITION from a F-14 to a F/A-18 - transitioning to a different airframe.

Upgrading to me means moving from a FO position to a Captain position.
Again - military analogy - moving from wingman to section lead.

So.......11 (c):

makes it sounds like a FO who is UPGRADING to CAPTAIN and TRANSITIONING to a different airframe would fall under this paragraph.

RJ FO upgrading to CA and transitioning from RJ to EMB-120 would be covered here.
Military analogy - F-14 wingman upgrading to a flight lead right after he has transitioned to the Hornet.

OK - long post - but please point out where I have misunderstood the airline model.

USMCFLYR

You can upgrade, or transition, or do both at the same time. Just because you are transitioning does not imply that it is not also an upgrade.

When you go from FO to CA for the FIRST time at SKW, that is your initial upgrade which you cannot fail. Any other training event (except new hire) you can fail and go back to your previous position.
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 08:10 AM
  #99  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

[QUOTE]
Originally Posted by rickair7777
You can upgrade, or transition, or do both at the same time. Just because you are transitioning does not imply that it is not also an upgrade.
Agreed.....and he was doing BOTH at the same time so I keyed on
c) Pilots, who are undergoing transition training for a captain or first officer position, may elect to return to their previous position for
which he/she was qualified and be frozen for a period of twelve (12)
months.
because he was undergoing transition (RJ to EMB) training for a captain [upgrade]....

When you go from FO to CA for the FIRST time at SKW, that is your initial upgrade which you cannot fail.
This is definiley the part that I'm getting stuck on. What is the scenario in 11(c) that isn't covered by the first time going from a FO to CA in the quote above? It certainly sounds like if an FO is going from a EMB to CRJ FO and he fails then he gets to go back to being an EMB FO. Correct?

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 08:28 AM
  #100  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

I think this says a lot about SkyWest and what type of place it is.

Union Yes
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices