Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Up and Out Policies: Upgrade >

Up and Out Policies: Upgrade

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Up and Out Policies: Upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2008 | 04:28 PM
  #111  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,137
Likes: 797
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
Apparently upgrade training as well after reading this thread. Not slamming the guy or kicking him when he's down. It's just a fact that's been revealed.
It is common knowledge that people do not just have a bad day and fail upgrade training...there are always underlying issues, such as attitude. If you bust a ride and have a good attitude, they work with you.

But you never hear "he was a great guy, but he failed upgrade and got fired". It usually does not come as a surprise...

Again TW's situation seems unusual and I don't know the answer, nor do I believe in up-or-out. If there is a wild-card in the process, it would be personality conflicts.
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 04:32 PM
  #112  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I think we all got your message the first time.

Your previous post about TW was technically legal but in very poor taste...I think it says a lot about someone when he kicks a man who's down
what are you talking about? I said he seemed like a stand up guy. I commented on the fact I feel bad for people that want to fly so badly they go across the world looking for a job.

The reason I stopped posting on here.....................its all coming back to me now haha

Last edited by JoeyMeatballs; 10-26-2008 at 04:37 PM.
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 04:35 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It is common knowledge that people do not just have a bad day and fail upgrade training...there are always underlying issues, such as attitude. If you bust a ride and have a good attitude, they work with you.

But you never hear "he was a great guy, but he failed upgrade and got fired". It usually does not come as a surprise...

Again TW's situation seems unusual and I don't know the answer, nor do I believe in up-or-out. If there is a wild-card in the process, it would be personality conflicts.
Yep, thanks, I know that. ALL I was saying is, they can can a guy when he's in the situation TW was in. I never implied I had inside knowledge. And yes, between the two places I've worked, I've seen plenty of which you speak
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 04:57 PM
  #114  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,137
Likes: 797
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
what are you talking about? I said he seemed like a stand up guy. I commented on the fact I feel bad for people that want to fly so badly they go across the world looking for a job.

The reason I stopped posting on here.....................its all coming back to me now haha
The post I read yesterday said nothing of the sort...looks like you edited it.
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 05:09 PM
  #115  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The post I read yesterday said nothing of the sort...looks like you edited it.
Don't think so Rickair, I didnt post anything other then whats up there now....
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 05:14 PM
  #116  
New Hire
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

"On the approach lights, he also asked how long the lights of an ALSF-2 extended from the runway. I said 3000ft. It's 2600."

I'd like to know where he got this. Both the Jepps and AIM have the ALSF's listed in a range from 2400-3000'. Also, the part about descending to 50' is not a reg. If you are over the Approach light system and don't have the runway in site (REIL's, etc) then I would think you also have lost the visibility and would have to go missed anyways.
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 05:36 PM
  #117  
SaltyDog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
From: Leftof longitudinal
Default

A. Conflict off interest by Check Airman/Designee. Unprofessional policy to have same person involved after a failure. Poor policy hurts credibility of company reputation. Skywest training dept:, you just took a hit in alot of professional minds.

B. This demonstrates the value of unions on property for pilots. Hopefully, this will be remembered next time their is an organizing effort at Skywest.

C. Loyalty and extra efforts done for your company are never remembered or 'banked'. People remember, but they are often not in a position to affect a change. i.e. Scheduling may have like TW's efforts to move airplanes, but in a corporate sense, you are invisible and will never be rewarded.

D. TW, sorry this happened. I would contest the termination on technicalities that Skywest did not follow the policy (except to terminate)


E. How any Capt at Skywest would support this policy flies in the face of the industry knowledge and current philosophy on CRM, etc.
Can only say "Wow" Again, not reputation enhancing.
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 05:48 PM
  #118  
Boomer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 15
From: blueJet
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
SkyWest Crewmember Policy Manual Revision 9
TRAINING
STANDARD PRACTICE 315
c) Pilots, who are undergoing transition training for a captain or first
officer position, may elect to return to their previous position for
which he/she was qualified and be frozen for a period of twelve (12)
months.
Position is Captain, First Officer, etc.

Equipment is EMB-120, CRJ-700, etc.

It does not say return to previous equipment, it says return to previous position, i.e. Captain back to FO.

An attorney worth a darn should be able to work with that.
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 05:49 PM
  #119  
contrails's Avatar
Line Holder
20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 1
Thumbs up Well Said

Originally Posted by SaltyDog
A. Conflict off interest by Check Airman/Designee. Unprofessional policy to have same person involved after a failure. Poor policy hurts credibility of company reputation. Skywest training dept:, you just took a hit in alot of professional minds.

B. This demonstrates the value of unions on property for pilots. Hopefully, this will be remembered next time their is an organizing effort at Skywest.

C. Loyalty and extra efforts done for your company are never remembered or 'banked'. People remember, but they are often not in a position to affect a change. i.e. Scheduling may have like TW's efforts to move airplanes, but in a corporate sense, you are invisible and will never be rewarded.

D. TW, sorry this happened. I would contest the termination on technicalities that Skywest did not follow the policy (except to terminate)


E. How any Capt at Skywest would support this policy flies in the face of the industry knowledge and current philosophy on CRM, etc.
Can only say "Wow" Again, not reputation enhancing.
This is a perfect summary of the situation from what I can tell.
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 06:03 PM
  #120  
flyfresno's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: CRJ-200/700/900 FO
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
When I was contemplating bidding CA on the EMB, everybody in general seemed to think that was a good idea. Idle small talk, many had been in the EMB before the CRJ, said it was fun (for a while).

Then, after I accepted the bid, I seemed to regularly bump into people that would question, "you're going from FO CRJ to CA EMB ?"

When I said yes, almost universally, they would say, "you're gunna have your hands full".
It's funny, I've also heard the "good idea" part a lot before. I think this is a big wake up call to us RJ FOs that have never flown the EMB before that this particular upgrade route is MUCH harder than most people make it out to be... Sorry to hear about what happened, best of luck to you Tony...

Last edited by flyfresno; 10-26-2008 at 06:32 PM.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices