Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

why the raise?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2009 | 09:55 AM
  #41  
Bond's Avatar
Gets Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: On Top
Default

Originally Posted by BigBallzMagee
Bravo.....The first rational post on this issue. So tired of the raise the minimums argument. Even though I meet them .... Plenty of high timers crashes on record. Show me data on low timers vs high timers crashes comparatively.........No correlation.
Wow you guys really missed the point didn't you? It's not about crashing airplanes, it's about improving the industry, the standards, and the expectations, if you're incapable of drawing the correlation, then maybe this isn't a good debate for you.
Reply
Old 06-05-2009 | 10:10 AM
  #42  
Tinpusher007's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 27
From: 330 B
Default

Originally Posted by Bond
Wow, so you missed the Colgan hearings altogether didn't you? I recommend you read or download the transcripts all the quantitative evidence you need.
But the Colgan crash does not prove that EVERY low time flight crew that gets paid crap and doesn't get proper rest will allow their aircraft to slow to stall speed on approach and not be able to properly recover.

I DO understand your point...it is a valid one. I am all for hiring standards being increased...even beyond what I was hired with. But that does not mean that I consider myself to be a liability to my passengers' safety. There are exceptions to every rule.
Reply
Old 06-05-2009 | 10:12 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by Bond
. When it's all set and done, I hope and anticipate nothing less than ATP as the mins. Let's see what happens.

I'd second that
Reply
Old 06-05-2009 | 10:15 AM
  #44  
DeltaPaySoon's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Stage Left
Default

Originally Posted by fjetter
If there is so much money in them then why do they all keep going CH 11??

I am SOOOOOOOOOO glad you put the smiley face behind that statement!
Reply
Old 06-05-2009 | 10:16 AM
  #45  
bryris's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Hotel
Default

Originally Posted by Bond
Wow you guys really missed the point didn't you? It's not about crashing airplanes, it's about improving the industry, the standards, and the expectations, if you're incapable of drawing the correlation, then maybe this isn't a good debate for you.
Your argument is like observing a slew of car crashes occurring by drivers from 25-65 years old, then drawing the conclusion that the minimum driving age needs to be raised higher than 16. Why? It doesn't compute.

I did catch much of the Colgan transcript. I heard what was said. But, I stand by the point that ATP mins doesn't do a thing to fix that and I reiterate that both were qualified to be there and had ATP+ hours. What goes into pilot qualification might be at issue, but a blanket hour minimum does nothing but make us with the hours feel warm and toasty.

I bet Marvin, sitting down over a cup of coffee, could tell you anything you needed to know about stalls and proper recovery. The planets aligned (or misaligned) that evening and all hell broke loose. The problem's solution isn't a simple "raise the standards" - crash history throughout commercial aviation doesn't support that argument. Perhaps a thorough study of human factors is mertied. That would likely shed more light on what happened than anything else.
Reply
Old 06-05-2009 | 10:17 AM
  #46  
Phuz's Avatar
Kerbal Rocket Surgeon
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
From: DTW 717A
Default

If I were to say:

Having an ATP F/O requirement makes the industry less safe, how many of you would agree with that statement?

From a safety standpoint, how can you argue against requiring more experience for people to fly part 121 ops?
Reply
Old 06-05-2009 | 10:20 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by BigBallzMagee
Plenty of high timers crashes on record. Show me data on low timers vs high timers crashes comparatively.........No correlation.

Actually, you are incorrect. Visit AOPA's website and do a search for their Nall Report. Flight time has a tangible, proven, direct correlation to accidents and incidents. The low time folks being the most dangerous, and oddly enough... the EXTREMELY high time folks have a bump back up from being the lowest risk.

The Nall report showed the under 100, 500 & 1000 to be the most dangerous

Slightly less risky were the over 1,000 and under 2,000 non ATP's

The ATP crowd was the least dangerous UNTIL they reached like over 25,000 hours and then was a small bump up again in accidents and incidents; but still well well below the under 1,000 crowd, and below the higher time non ATP's.

If you dig through the report enough, the general take is the ATP ticket holders are statistically the safest. People may not like it, but the stats are what they are.
Reply
Old 06-05-2009 | 10:55 AM
  #48  
bryris's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Hotel
Default

Do the stats take into consideration that the VAST majority of the GA airplanes flying at anytime are being flown by private pilots with sub 1,500 hours?

Do they take into consideration that most ATPs are flying airplanes that have 2 engines, redundant systems, flight directors, radars, etc, whereas the weekend warriors are flying around 40 year old airplanes w/ steam gauges and handheld non IFR yoke mounted GPS systems.

Do they take into consideration that your average commercial airplane is subjected to much heavier mx checks than Bob's 172 that bakes out on the ramp all day long for weeks on end?

Stats don't always tell the full story.

PLUS: All these crashes happened with pilots that fall in that ATP bracket at the helm. There must be something else then.

Last edited by bryris; 06-05-2009 at 11:21 AM.
Reply
Old 06-05-2009 | 01:41 PM
  #49  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

Originally Posted by mrmak2
Does anyone actually know how many (or what percentage) of new hires had less then 1500 hours? Less than 1000 hours? Yes there were absolutely people hired with less than 500 hours but in my opinion these were an extremely small minority.
.
The first half of 2008, Colgan was turning over close to 5% of its pilots each month (based on class size and how fast my seniority number changed). In my class (Saab late 2007) we had about 18 people. Only 2 or 3 had ATP mins, and only one actual ATP. So, you do the math.
Reply
Old 06-05-2009 | 01:48 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH
The first half of 2008, Colgan was turning over close to 5% of its pilots each month (based on class size and how fast my seniority number changed). In my class (Saab late 2007) we had about 18 people. Only 2 or 3 had ATP mins, and only one actual ATP. So, you do the math.

We already know Colgan is part of the problem, I'm talking about industry-wide.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Commando
Major
34
03-30-2009 07:29 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
01-01-2009 12:48 PM
Overnitefr8
Cargo
125
12-23-2008 09:40 AM
MajorKong
Cargo
3
11-06-2008 04:07 PM
PinnacleFO
Mergers and Acquisitions
86
08-21-2008 07:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices