Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers >

Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2009 | 05:34 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainCarl
Doesn't exist anymore. I already checked. Plus, if you think about it, what happens if they (the FAA) give you a waiver, you upgrade (by some miracle) and then you crash (God forbid)? There's gonna be all kinds of hell to pay. Anyways, I suspect anyone who is already in the system will be grandpa'd in.
Most FO's at the regional have just a CPL anyway, the air carriers will probably have a year or so to bring them through to do an ATP checkride during their normal training cycle.
Reply
Old 07-29-2009 | 05:36 AM
  #22  
CaptainCarl's Avatar
I'm a man of my word.
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0
From: Devil's Advocate
Default

Originally Posted by squawkoff
What about honesty???? Hanger flying or parker pen time? Anyone can sit down and pen in a thousand hours. Bold, but desperate people do desperate things. How hard would it be to catch these people who "pen" in their time? With that being said, as a past sim instructor I have seen clients come through with thousands of hours and have wondered how they have stayed alive. On the other hand I have seen those with much less experienced whose skill and judgment were excellent. I have also flown with these people that have the same experiences as previously mentioned so it's not a "sim" thing.
I can't tell you how many pilots I've come across who have pencil-whipped their logbooks to meet the "minimums" so they could get a job, meet insurance requirements, etc. I wouldn't go as far to say that everyone does it ('cuz I know enough pilots who don't) but it happens a lot. Older pilots have told me their stories about buying airplanes and "building time." Anyways, the only way to find out if someone's skill and judgment are commensurate with their logbook is to train 'em and check 'em. Even that fails though, as I have flown with a few pilots who made me "wonder how they have stayed alive."
Reply
Old 07-29-2009 | 05:37 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: crj-200 FO
Default

Originally Posted by HercDriver130
Some guys hired with say 1000 hour or less in some cases may not have the requisite PIC hours for an ATP even when they have in excess of 1500 hours....

I have thought for many years that to fly 121 both should be "Airline Transport Pilots"...its a start if nothing else.
250 hr. of flight time as PIC of an airplane, or as SIC performing the duties and functions of a PIC under the supervision of a PIC, or by any combination of the two.
Reply
Old 07-29-2009 | 05:56 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default

I couldn't help but notice in their proposed changes there was no mention of pilots getting paid more than someone working full time at taco-bell. At the very least we should be getting mandatory quesadeas for lets say 6hrs of duty.

Also, maybe they could draft some new standards for car drivers too. They seem to be crashing as much as ever these days.

And maybe they could just make a big database for every profession out there where anyone who's failed a test ever for their related job can't get hired because even if they did go and pass the test they're still unsafe...
Reply
Old 07-29-2009 | 05:56 AM
  #25  
dn_wisconsin's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by USMC3197
250 hr. of flight time as PIC of an airplane, or as SIC performing the duties and functions of a PIC under the supervision of a PIC, or by any combination of the two.
Yes, but I believe the next line says no more than half of your time counted towards the 1500 can be SIC. I think that is just an ICAO requirement but that also means you can't fly out of the country if you have the restriction.

That doesn't sound completely right so someone chime in if I'm wrong.
Reply
Old 07-29-2009 | 06:08 AM
  #26  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

this is fantastic news!! I've been emailing all the representatives about this for a couple years, SIGN IT!!
Reply
Old 07-29-2009 | 06:09 AM
  #27  
seven6's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Tu-95 PIC
Default

I wonder how this would play out for the furloughed folks that don't meet the minimums. On one end they have recall rights via there contract... on the other, they now don't meet the minimums.
Reply
Old 07-29-2009 | 06:19 AM
  #28  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

with out that in place they essentially are just enabling the airlines to keep pay low and skimp on safety.

I emailed the FAA and told them that what the airlines were doing was equlivalent to putting a 16 year old with a fresh license behind the wheel of a schoolbus full of kids. Its only a matter of time before something bad happens.

Putting that restriction on the airlines is a step into the right direction for safety and pay. Imagine that, making the airlines hire pilots with a requirement to meet *gasp* AIRLINE TRANSPORT PILOT STANDARDS!!
Reply
Old 07-29-2009 | 06:19 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: CFI
Default

As a guy who has 1200 hours, I could think of rules I like better than 1500 and an ATP. But that's life I guess. It would seem to me though this new proposal could cause a shortage of pilots because there would be so few who have that much time. I suspect lobbyist for the industry will work on that ATP 1500 hour porposal.
Reply
Old 07-29-2009 | 06:23 AM
  #30  
Radials Rule's Avatar
Rubber dogsh#t out of HKG
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 638
Likes: 2
From: Senior Seat Cushion Tester Extraordinaire
Default

Originally Posted by seven6
I wonder how this would play out for the furloughed folks that don't meet the minimums. On one end they have recall rights via there contract... on the other, they now don't meet the minimums.
I would think, or at least hope that some kind of grandfather clause would protect those that already have a seniority number.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices