Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers >

Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2009, 07:16 AM
  #51  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

There may be a pilot shortage as a result, however, how is the pay going to go up if the union keeps voting contracts that sells out the junior pilots. That's been the number one problem in this industry. Managers mismanage and only have x amount of dollars to pay out, the union decides how that x amount is divided up. Will mainline guys give up some pay to increase 1st year regional pay to attract higher qualified candidates?
Mesabah is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:17 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
seven6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Tu-95 PIC
Posts: 104
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot View Post
Not sure where this boom is coming from...... Have you looked at how many pilots are furloughed from majors and regionals? Also our economy is in the dumps and airlines are contracting just to stay alive. There won't be any large term growth (which is what causes hiring not age 65 attrition) for the foreseeable future. I think this is a myth perpetuated by flight schools.
I disagree with your opinion but for the sake of staying on topic I will leave it at that.
seven6 is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:23 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot View Post
PC's evaluate your skill in manipulating the controls under a given set of conditions, it does nothing to evaluate the decision making ability especially for a FO. Experience is what leads to good decision making skills....
Ok and I don't disagree with you, but as an example I have flown with many captains ( me as FP ) that when faced with any important decisions, have always expected my input, in the process, and sometimes they have simply listened and said sounds good ( that allows me to hone my decision making skills) by talking it out. You will never convince me that any flight crew where the Captain treats his FO as a "CAPT in training", and any FO that holds himself to that standard, is not valuable experiance. And it sounds an aweful lot like the mentoring that people say there needs to be more of....agreed?

Last edited by TPROP4ever; 07-29-2009 at 07:41 AM.
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:24 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by seven6 View Post
I disagree with your opinion but for the sake of staying on topic I will leave it at that.
I am open to other opinions try me out! It is just that this "pilot shortage rumor" has been going on since I started flyng 24 years ago..... I was hired at a major during one of the so called "booms" and in my class the average male had over 10,000 hours and 4 type ratings. My airline interviewed almost 12,000 applicants to select 400 pilots, and these were the guys they interviewed heck who knows how many applications they received. I just don't see any pilot shortage in the near future (5-10 years).
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:25 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
There may be a pilot shortage as a result, however, how is the pay going to go up if the union keeps voting contracts that sells out the junior pilots. That's been the number one problem in this industry. Managers mismanage and only have x amount of dollars to pay out, the union decides how that x amount is divided up. Will mainline guys give up some pay to increase 1st year regional pay to attract higher qualified candidates?
AHHHH....Nope!!!!
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:29 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,197
Default

Originally Posted by TPROP4ever View Post
Hence what happens when lawmakers become reactionary. How many of us are sitting on furlough lists within the neighborhood of 1000hrs. Now lets see dont meet the IFR mins for 135, or for the ATP, lets give em the ax and clean up that furlough list...and there are plenty of us 1000hr wonders who have never failed a test or check, done well on line checks,ect. I had someone ask me how someone could have only 1000hrs when they were with an airline for a year. Its easy junior guys sitting reserve, only flew 400hrs that year... The ATP min sounds like a good idea, and it may be, so instead well what about taking the existing guys and making them meet ATP standards on all PC's. Oh wait we already do that...see my point? Hopefully they will at least have some kind of grandfather clause in there..time will tell
I see what you are saying and I agree, but I don't think you understand Delta and Comair management. If they could legally let go of all of their furloughed guys, they would do it in a heart beat. Not that I think that's a good idea, but it's blatantly obvious right now that they have a hatchet in their hands.
TurboDog is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:32 AM
  #57  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by TPROP4ever View Post
AHHHH....Nope!!!!
Well then the truth is that the colgan accident is an acceptable outcome and risk given the rewards to the company and other pilots by keeping pay low for their benefit.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:34 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by TPROP4ever View Post
Ok and I don't disagree with you, but as an example I have flown with many captains ( me as FP ) that when faced with any important decisions, have always expected my input, in the process, and sometimes they have simply listened and said sounds good ( that allows me to gain decision making skills) by talking it out. You will never convince me that any flight crew where the Captain treats his FO as a "CAPT in training", and any FO that holds himself to that standard, is not valuable experiance. And it sounds an aweful lot like the mentoring that people say there needs to be more of....agreed?
This is the way it should be done! But the ability to make those good decisions (under the guidance from the PIC) comes from experience. In our profession there aren't too many ways to evaluate decision making skills. By being experienced enough to be an asset to PIC as opposed to the PIC being a flight instructor is when a pilot becomes part of the crew.

As a previous APD, LCA, IP, and FC I had the privelege to evaluate and fly with both highly experienced and low time pilots. As mentioned above just because someone has the TT number does not make them a good pilot nor does being low time make them a poor pilot. What flight time does is allow an individual to understand our ATC system, and learn to make decision without putting passengers in jeopardy.
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:38 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by TurboDog View Post
I see what you are saying and I agree, but I don't think you understand Delta and Comair management. If they could legally let go of all of their furloughed guys, they would do it in a heart beat. Not that I think that's a good idea, but it's blatantly obvious right now that they have a hatchet in their hands.
And I hate to say it, but the really senior guys would say do it, ax em, raise pay so we can get quality people, unfortunately I am willing to bet the only pay they want raised is at the top of the scale, I bet 1st or 2nd year pay would stay the same, across the boards while senior top scale pay would climb. I think if they (senior pilots) could get the dividing line (1500, 2500, whatever) raised, they now have an excuse to say hey look how experianced I am, I have a suspition that ALPA is behind this for the monetary reasons not the safety.....I am afraid this is politically motivated. If this goes through I would hope I'm wrong on this......I so want to be wrong on this
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:40 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
Well then the truth is that the colgan accident is an acceptable outcome and risk given the rewards to the company and other pilots by keeping pay low for their benefit.
No I was just saying that no matter how many people scream for change, in the end they only want change if it doesnt directly affect them, thats all
TPROP4ever is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices