Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Favorite Richard A quote >

Favorite Richard A quote

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Favorite Richard A quote

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2009 | 02:24 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by thrustsetrj200
Ugh, I knew this would be your response. "You regional pilots don't understand...not until you become a high and mighty major airline pilot will you understand". That mentality drives me crazy. Much to your surprise we tiny, insignificant, clueless and ignorant regional pilots do understand the past and do put the pieces together. Once again, thanks for the history lesson that we didn't ask for. Once again, thanks for letting us know mainline jobs are #1. I have said that about a dozen times on this thread. No I won't give RA credit. Not one BIT.
You have strayed from the topic just to teach us a history lesson. Thanks.
It's people like you and your mentality that impedes this industry to move forward because you are stuck in the past.
Now, please read my comment before this one. Let's get back on subject.
If your goal is unity, then why don't you push for all branded flying to be done by pilots on DAL's seniority list? That's what I'd like to see. Be it a Saab, CRJ, ERJ, 320, 777, 747 or anything in between.

Also, I'd like to see DAL's hiring mins and requirements(no SLI or staple). This would solve your prior post about bottom feeder contract carriers, because there would not be any!

What do you say? Would you fight for this kind of unity knowing you'd lose your job and have to re-interview? That way, DAL could "right size" the regional flying easier. Too bad we'd have to wait for some iron clad contracts to expire before this could become reality.

Would this make us unified enough?

BTW, since RA is not your CEO , it doesn't matter if you give him credit or not. Talk to any DAL pilot(especially junior) and we will give him(and DALPA) credit for not furloughing pilots(yet). So far, he is guiding this airline through rough times. I'll cautiously support him until he proves it's not justified(BTW, I'm FNWA and am familiar w/RA).
Reply
Old 08-07-2009 | 03:00 PM
  #52  
The Chow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
From: 1st year pay for the 3rd time
Default

Originally Posted by RichieAshburn
If your goal is unity, then why don't you push for all branded flying to be done by pilots on DAL's seniority list? That's what I'd like to see. Be it a Saab, CRJ, ERJ, 320, 777, 747 or anything in between.

Also, I'd like to see DAL's hiring mins and requirements(no SLI or staple). This would solve your prior post about bottom feeder contract carriers, because there would not be any!

What do you say? Would you fight for this kind of unity knowing you'd lose your job and have to re-interview? That way, DAL could "right size" the regional flying easier. Too bad we'd have to wait for some iron clad contracts to expire before this could become reality.

Would this make us unified enough?

BTW, since RA is not your CEO , it doesn't matter if you give him credit or not. Talk to any DAL pilot(especially junior) and we will give him(and DALPA) credit for not furloughing pilots(yet). So far, he is guiding this airline through rough times. I'll cautiously support him until he proves it's not justified(BTW, I'm FNWA and am familiar w/RA).

I like this idea. I'm already furloughed and doubt OH will be around long enough to recall, but I certainly would take my chances re-interviewing to fly the same plane I was flying when furloughed!
Reply
Old 08-08-2009 | 07:28 AM
  #53  
H46Bubba's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
From: NOYDB
Default

Originally Posted by RichieAshburn
BTW, since RA is not your CEO , it doesn't matter if you give him credit or not. Talk to any DAL pilot(especially junior) and we will give him(and DALPA) credit for not furloughing pilots(yet). So far, he is guiding this airline through rough times. I'll cautiously support him until he proves it's not justified(BTW, I'm FNWA and am familiar w/RA).
RA is our CEO of Delta and all it's subsidiaries. We only have Presidents to lead the three wholly owned carriers, who are personally chosen by RA himself. I think RA's doing a great job at keeping you guys in the cockpit and off the street. RA is bound by the contracts signed by the previous Delta CEO's so he has to make the cuts from where he can. There are some that think it's personal or a "vendetta"; especially here at Comair. The whole thing with the shrinking of the wholly owned carriers is just business.
Reply
Old 08-08-2009 | 08:28 AM
  #54  
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: G550 Captain
Default

[quote=RichieAshburn;658177]If your goal is unity, then why don't you push for all branded flying to be done by pilots on DAL's seniority list? That's what I'd like to see. Be it a Saab, CRJ, ERJ, 320, 777, 747 or anything in between. Also, I'd like to see DAL's hiring mins and requirements(no SLI or staple). This would solve your prior post about bottom feeder contract carriers, because there would not be any!

This is a good comment. This is the way it SHOULD have been from the beginning. This is the way it is done at Lufthansa and at Air Canada. The current system under the DAL management only breeds disunity amongst pilots. Divide and conquer philosophy has been around for a very long time and the Brits have used it very successfully during their heyday while pillaging India, China and other parts of the world.

One thing I would like to point out is that this current reductions of wholly owned DCI carriers such as Mesaba and Comair is NOT going to add more jobs at DAL. If you take a poll right now among experienced senior NWA and DAL pilots, majority of them will tell you that there is a very strong indication that DAL wants to operate with less than 12,500 pilots. Closer to around 10,000 pilots is what I am hearing. Take a look at current routes such as DTW to AUS or DTW/MEM to SLC to AUS to BOI etc. These were all DAL mainline routes that are now being flown by 76 RJs and instead of decreasing, they are on the rise.
Reply
Old 08-08-2009 | 08:50 AM
  #55  
thrustsetrj200's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Default

I think this would be just fine. I think it would definitely unify the pilot groups. This would never happen. If it's all about the money then this would never be a reality.
Pinnacle, Skywest and ASA would go out of business if that happened.
Reply
Old 08-08-2009 | 09:51 AM
  #56  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

I think the wholly owned carriers will eventually grow again as the non-wholly owned carriers contracts are up for renewal. The problem is that short term pain will be felt. I don't understand why you would get rid of any aircraft right now as the economy improves. Age 65 is still the biggest career killer for current pilots, it moves the furlough threat to an older age which makes leaving your current carrier more difficult.
Reply
Old 08-08-2009 | 09:54 AM
  #57  
WIFlyer's Avatar
11 soon to be 10 days off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: Left seat, wait right seat, no no left seat, nope right seat! Ummmm, I guess I am confused
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
This industry is rough, & yes Comair & Mesaba are shrinking. However, keep in mind that they grew at the EXPENSE of Mainline jobs, & Mainline jobs is where RA's primary responsibilty is in regards to employee relations. DCI have their own CEOs.
Soooo, we should look for more mainline jobs to appear then??
Reply
Old 08-08-2009 | 11:44 AM
  #58  
DAL4EVER's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Default

[QUOTE=Lighteningspeed;658437]
Originally Posted by RichieAshburn
If your goal is unity, then why don't you push for all branded flying to be done by pilots on DAL's seniority list? That's what I'd like to see. Be it a Saab, CRJ, ERJ, 320, 777, 747 or anything in between. Also, I'd like to see DAL's hiring mins and requirements(no SLI or staple). This would solve your prior post about bottom feeder contract carriers, because there would not be any!

This is a good comment. This is the way it SHOULD have been from the beginning. This is the way it is done at Lufthansa and at Air Canada. The current system under the DAL management only breeds disunity amongst pilots. Divide and conquer philosophy has been around for a very long time and the Brits have used it very successfully during their heyday while pillaging India, China and other parts of the world.

One thing I would like to point out is that this current reductions of wholly owned DCI carriers such as Mesaba and Comair is NOT going to add more jobs at DAL. If you take a poll right now among experienced senior NWA and DAL pilots, majority of them will tell you that there is a very strong indication that DAL wants to operate with less than 12,500 pilots. Closer to around 10,000 pilots is what I am hearing. Take a look at current routes such as DTW to AUS or DTW/MEM to SLC to AUS to BOI etc. These were all DAL mainline routes that are now being flown by 76 RJs and instead of decreasing, they are on the rise.
Where do you get the 10,000 pilot list from? I have not heard anyone say that. To do that would result in more than the just the -9s and the 742s leaving the property. To date, only the 9-30s are on the chopping block as well as some older 757s. However, there is a push to add up to 50 additional MD90s as well as the 777s and 737s they have on order.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IPAMD11FO
Hangar Talk
76
12-03-2013 04:38 PM
AAL763
Hangar Talk
16
04-28-2009 08:17 PM
Seeburg220
Hangar Talk
36
09-22-2008 11:08 PM
AAL763
Hangar Talk
0
08-30-2008 09:18 AM
AmericanEagleFO
Hangar Talk
11
08-11-2008 11:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices