1500 hour FO mins
#71
I did in the other thread. I'm not going to play the cross posting game. Didn't realize I was arguing with the same person. No reason to say the same things to the same person twice...
oh, and if you READ those accidents, and then search it ONLY by fatals and read those accidents, you will see a vastly different picture.
oh, and if you READ those accidents, and then search it ONLY by fatals and read those accidents, you will see a vastly different picture.
#72
Gets Weekend Reserve
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,277
Likes: 273
From: B737CA
I've been pretty harsh on regional pilots myself, but mainly due to their own ignorance and lack of humility as evident on these boards.
See, here's the thing - I see very few regional pilots on here actually sounding grateful of their break. Often quite contrary - full of themselves and definitely not humble at all.
I got my first regional job flying Dash 8's after having flown single pilot cargo for a year and a half spread over 3 companies (the first went under, the second shrunk and the third was Ameriflight) - both VFR and IFR.
While most arguments here address how it's perfectly acceptable for FO's to come onboard with really low time, at what point does a 300 hour pilot learn to act as a pilot-in-command, and by that I mean accept responsibility and start making command decisions. Is it really fair to our passengers for a pilot to just start learning how to be a pilot-in-command?
At 1500 hours, I had roughly 1300 or so hours of TRUE pilot-in-command time. Between flying skydivers, air tours and boxes, flying both IFR and VFR, having been exposed to and dealt with paperwork, signing for the airplane, being faced with challenges of line flying as a PIC, I felt ready to delve into the AIRLINE world AS AN FO! I learned the ropes in how the airline worked; I learned from captains and COMPOUNDED on my previous experiences to formulate myself as a captain. When upgrade came, I was ready.
The problem with hiring 300 hour pilots is that they haven't formed any sort of PIC experience. Their PIC experience consists of flight school telling them it's OK to do their cross country flights, or a joyride with friends. I remember what I was like at 300 hours, and while there's no doubt I would be all over trying to get into a right seat of an airliner at that time, I feel that I would have been shorted some basic fundamentals and a lot of experience early on in my career that I find extremely beneficial to me today. In other words, my foundation as a pilot would have been that much weaker had I not had "an opportunity" to season before getting into a 121 cockpit.
That's the ultimate problem with hiring low time pilots, and that's why I think that requiring an ATP or at least ATP minimums of all regional new hires is an absolute great idea. On top of that, I would do away with SIC type ratings as well and make sure everyone gets a full PIC type rating under ATP standards even as a brand new FO new-hire.
Remember, it's not about us... it's about our passengers and clients. They deserve the best, and I think we should provide them with our best.
Salary and pay... that's another post.
See, here's the thing - I see very few regional pilots on here actually sounding grateful of their break. Often quite contrary - full of themselves and definitely not humble at all.
I got my first regional job flying Dash 8's after having flown single pilot cargo for a year and a half spread over 3 companies (the first went under, the second shrunk and the third was Ameriflight) - both VFR and IFR.
While most arguments here address how it's perfectly acceptable for FO's to come onboard with really low time, at what point does a 300 hour pilot learn to act as a pilot-in-command, and by that I mean accept responsibility and start making command decisions. Is it really fair to our passengers for a pilot to just start learning how to be a pilot-in-command?
At 1500 hours, I had roughly 1300 or so hours of TRUE pilot-in-command time. Between flying skydivers, air tours and boxes, flying both IFR and VFR, having been exposed to and dealt with paperwork, signing for the airplane, being faced with challenges of line flying as a PIC, I felt ready to delve into the AIRLINE world AS AN FO! I learned the ropes in how the airline worked; I learned from captains and COMPOUNDED on my previous experiences to formulate myself as a captain. When upgrade came, I was ready.
The problem with hiring 300 hour pilots is that they haven't formed any sort of PIC experience. Their PIC experience consists of flight school telling them it's OK to do their cross country flights, or a joyride with friends. I remember what I was like at 300 hours, and while there's no doubt I would be all over trying to get into a right seat of an airliner at that time, I feel that I would have been shorted some basic fundamentals and a lot of experience early on in my career that I find extremely beneficial to me today. In other words, my foundation as a pilot would have been that much weaker had I not had "an opportunity" to season before getting into a 121 cockpit.
That's the ultimate problem with hiring low time pilots, and that's why I think that requiring an ATP or at least ATP minimums of all regional new hires is an absolute great idea. On top of that, I would do away with SIC type ratings as well and make sure everyone gets a full PIC type rating under ATP standards even as a brand new FO new-hire.
Remember, it's not about us... it's about our passengers and clients. They deserve the best, and I think we should provide them with our best.
Salary and pay... that's another post.
#73
I've been pretty harsh on regional pilots myself, but mainly due to their own ignorance and lack of humility as evident on these boards.
See, here's the thing - I see very few regional pilots on here actually sounding grateful of their break. Often quite contrary - full of themselves and definitely not humble at all.
I got my first regional job flying Dash 8's after having flown single pilot cargo for a year and a half spread over 3 companies (the first went under, the second shrunk and the third was Ameriflight) - both VFR and IFR.
While most arguments here address how it's perfectly acceptable for FO's to come onboard with really low time, at what point does a 300 hour pilot learn to act as a pilot-in-command, and by that I mean accept responsibility and start making command decisions. Is it really fair to our passengers for a pilot to just start learning how to be a pilot-in-command?
At 1500 hours, I had roughly 1300 or so hours of TRUE pilot-in-command time. Between flying skydivers, air tours and boxes, flying both IFR and VFR, having been exposed to and dealt with paperwork, signing for the airplane, being faced with challenges of line flying as a PIC, I felt ready to delve into the AIRLINE world AS AN FO! I learned the ropes in how the airline worked; I learned from captains and COMPOUNDED on my previous experiences to formulate myself as a captain. When upgrade came, I was ready.
The problem with hiring 300 hour pilots is that they haven't formed any sort of PIC experience. Their PIC experience consists of flight school telling them it's OK to do their cross country flights, or a joyride with friends. I remember what I was like at 300 hours, and while there's no doubt I would be all over trying to get into a right seat of an airliner at that time, I feel that I would have been shorted A LOT of experience early on in my career that I find extremely beneficial to me today. In other words, my foundation as a pilot would have been that much weaker had I not had "an opportunity" to season before getting into a 121 cockpit.
That's the ultimate problem with hiring low time pilots, and that's why I think that requiring an ATP or at least ATP minimums of all regional new hires is an absolute great idea. On top of that, I would do away with SIC type ratings as well and make sure everyone gets a full PIC type rating under ATP standards even as a brand new FO new-hire.
Remember, it's not about us... it's about our passengers and clients. They deserve the best, and I think we should provide them with our best.
Salary and pay... that's another post.
See, here's the thing - I see very few regional pilots on here actually sounding grateful of their break. Often quite contrary - full of themselves and definitely not humble at all.
I got my first regional job flying Dash 8's after having flown single pilot cargo for a year and a half spread over 3 companies (the first went under, the second shrunk and the third was Ameriflight) - both VFR and IFR.
While most arguments here address how it's perfectly acceptable for FO's to come onboard with really low time, at what point does a 300 hour pilot learn to act as a pilot-in-command, and by that I mean accept responsibility and start making command decisions. Is it really fair to our passengers for a pilot to just start learning how to be a pilot-in-command?
At 1500 hours, I had roughly 1300 or so hours of TRUE pilot-in-command time. Between flying skydivers, air tours and boxes, flying both IFR and VFR, having been exposed to and dealt with paperwork, signing for the airplane, being faced with challenges of line flying as a PIC, I felt ready to delve into the AIRLINE world AS AN FO! I learned the ropes in how the airline worked; I learned from captains and COMPOUNDED on my previous experiences to formulate myself as a captain. When upgrade came, I was ready.
The problem with hiring 300 hour pilots is that they haven't formed any sort of PIC experience. Their PIC experience consists of flight school telling them it's OK to do their cross country flights, or a joyride with friends. I remember what I was like at 300 hours, and while there's no doubt I would be all over trying to get into a right seat of an airliner at that time, I feel that I would have been shorted A LOT of experience early on in my career that I find extremely beneficial to me today. In other words, my foundation as a pilot would have been that much weaker had I not had "an opportunity" to season before getting into a 121 cockpit.
That's the ultimate problem with hiring low time pilots, and that's why I think that requiring an ATP or at least ATP minimums of all regional new hires is an absolute great idea. On top of that, I would do away with SIC type ratings as well and make sure everyone gets a full PIC type rating under ATP standards even as a brand new FO new-hire.
Remember, it's not about us... it's about our passengers and clients. They deserve the best, and I think we should provide them with our best.
Salary and pay... that's another post.
#74
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
I wasn't talking about all accidents, there are hundreds every year where the crew did nothing wrong... most of the time it's injuries due to severe turbulence... that does not change the fact that the most recent fatal accidents have ALL been regionals. Argue all you want, facts are facts.
I am not talking about ground crews that walked into running jet engines either... so, when you look at the lists, take the time to read the summary.
I am not talking about ground crews that walked into running jet engines either... so, when you look at the lists, take the time to read the summary.
Here, with IP's help we can clue you in;
And if you do some research, you might find that to be the case of the other one.
#75
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
How about 2500 hr's. That would be somewhere around 1000 hr's instructing plus maybe another 1.5 - 2 yr's real world experience flying boxes, pax, lab work,etc. I know not all people would would get out of instructing at 135 min's to build time, but I believe enough would to advance their careers. I am not bashing CFI's, just pointing out how very controled the environment is in which they work. Just a thought.
Living the dream, one nightmare at a time
Living the dream, one nightmare at a time
So...I think if we make the law 2500 hours, it should be retroactive.
Fire every regional pilot who didn't CFI for 1000 hours and then fly 1.5-2 years of boxes/labwork/135. They need to go hit the pattern, master steep turns, and interpret weather for their 50nm cross countries.
It's the only way to make the regionals safer. Once they've gone back and learned the basics, they can reapply for the jobs they are so dangerously performing at now.
At 1500 hours, I had roughly 1300 or so hours of TRUE pilot-in-command time. Between flying skydivers, air tours and boxes, flying both IFR and VFR, having been exposed to and dealt with paperwork, signing for the airplane, being faced with challenges of line flying as a PIC, I felt ready to delve into the AIRLINE world AS AN FO! I learned the ropes in how the airline worked; I learned from captains and COMPOUNDED on my previous experiences to formulate myself as a captain. When upgrade came, I was ready.
#76
Inverted
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: CL65 CA
I'm not sure how to take the tone of your post, but is it really necessary to have two sets of years picking up a clearance? That was my whole point - that as an FO you should know how to pick it up and be able to set-up for that clearance without having to have your hand held! By the time you make it to an airline, there are certain porcedures that should be able to be accomplished without consulting the AIM, methinks!
#77
Considering the fact that no regional has crashed with a pilot under 2200 hours, that indicates that the 2200-5000 hour pilots are the problem.
So...I think if we make the law 2500 hours, it should be retroactive.
Fire every regional pilot who didn't CFI for 1000 hours and then fly 1.5-2 years of boxes/labwork/135. They need to go hit the pattern, master steep turns, and interpret weather for their 50nm cross countries.
It's the only way to make the regionals safer. Once they've gone back and learned the basics, they can reapply for the jobs they are so dangerously performing at now.
According to this thread, you weren't even close to ready. 1500 hours is just getting started. You need to take a COLA and go pick up a CFI job to experience all the things real pilots learned before their first 121 job. I need to know what major you work for so I remember not to let my family fly on it.
So...I think if we make the law 2500 hours, it should be retroactive.
Fire every regional pilot who didn't CFI for 1000 hours and then fly 1.5-2 years of boxes/labwork/135. They need to go hit the pattern, master steep turns, and interpret weather for their 50nm cross countries.
It's the only way to make the regionals safer. Once they've gone back and learned the basics, they can reapply for the jobs they are so dangerously performing at now.
According to this thread, you weren't even close to ready. 1500 hours is just getting started. You need to take a COLA and go pick up a CFI job to experience all the things real pilots learned before their first 121 job. I need to know what major you work for so I remember not to let my family fly on it.
There is so much anger, and clearly obvious jealousy in your post it is amusing.
#78
It sucks to have to babysit a spiky haired, Iphone texting (during taxi nonetheless!), nonchecklist reading, cocky for no reason airline "pilot". I say 1500 hours should be the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM!
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
I think 1500 hours would be a good thing. This thread just kills me though.
The 1600 hour pilot says "1500 hours should be the minimum!"
The 2600 hour pilot says "no 1500 isn't enough! it should be 2500!"
And you have your sprinkling of more experienced pilots who "wont put their families on regionals because of the 300 hour pilots", when in fact its the 2200-5000 hour+ folks (who could easily be sitting next to them at CAL or SWA) who are balling up perfectly good airplanes.
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
How about acting like you're in charge and telling him how things are going to happen on your trip together?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



