Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

1500 hour FO mins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2009 | 05:20 PM
  #71  
NightIP's Avatar
Tuk er jerbs!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: B747 Left
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
I did in the other thread. I'm not going to play the cross posting game. Didn't realize I was arguing with the same person. No reason to say the same things to the same person twice...

oh, and if you READ those accidents, and then search it ONLY by fatals and read those accidents, you will see a vastly different picture.
We'll leave it on the other thread then. I did the legwork and made it easy for the readers to see how that's an incorrect statement.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 05:27 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,277
Likes: 273
From: B737CA
Default

I've been pretty harsh on regional pilots myself, but mainly due to their own ignorance and lack of humility as evident on these boards.

See, here's the thing - I see very few regional pilots on here actually sounding grateful of their break. Often quite contrary - full of themselves and definitely not humble at all.

I got my first regional job flying Dash 8's after having flown single pilot cargo for a year and a half spread over 3 companies (the first went under, the second shrunk and the third was Ameriflight) - both VFR and IFR.

While most arguments here address how it's perfectly acceptable for FO's to come onboard with really low time, at what point does a 300 hour pilot learn to act as a pilot-in-command, and by that I mean accept responsibility and start making command decisions. Is it really fair to our passengers for a pilot to just start learning how to be a pilot-in-command?

At 1500 hours, I had roughly 1300 or so hours of TRUE pilot-in-command time. Between flying skydivers, air tours and boxes, flying both IFR and VFR, having been exposed to and dealt with paperwork, signing for the airplane, being faced with challenges of line flying as a PIC, I felt ready to delve into the AIRLINE world AS AN FO! I learned the ropes in how the airline worked; I learned from captains and COMPOUNDED on my previous experiences to formulate myself as a captain. When upgrade came, I was ready.

The problem with hiring 300 hour pilots is that they haven't formed any sort of PIC experience. Their PIC experience consists of flight school telling them it's OK to do their cross country flights, or a joyride with friends. I remember what I was like at 300 hours, and while there's no doubt I would be all over trying to get into a right seat of an airliner at that time, I feel that I would have been shorted some basic fundamentals and a lot of experience early on in my career that I find extremely beneficial to me today. In other words, my foundation as a pilot would have been that much weaker had I not had "an opportunity" to season before getting into a 121 cockpit.

That's the ultimate problem with hiring low time pilots, and that's why I think that requiring an ATP or at least ATP minimums of all regional new hires is an absolute great idea. On top of that, I would do away with SIC type ratings as well and make sure everyone gets a full PIC type rating under ATP standards even as a brand new FO new-hire.

Remember, it's not about us... it's about our passengers and clients. They deserve the best, and I think we should provide them with our best.

Salary and pay... that's another post.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 05:31 PM
  #73  
NightIP's Avatar
Tuk er jerbs!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: B747 Left
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
I've been pretty harsh on regional pilots myself, but mainly due to their own ignorance and lack of humility as evident on these boards.

See, here's the thing - I see very few regional pilots on here actually sounding grateful of their break. Often quite contrary - full of themselves and definitely not humble at all.

I got my first regional job flying Dash 8's after having flown single pilot cargo for a year and a half spread over 3 companies (the first went under, the second shrunk and the third was Ameriflight) - both VFR and IFR.

While most arguments here address how it's perfectly acceptable for FO's to come onboard with really low time, at what point does a 300 hour pilot learn to act as a pilot-in-command, and by that I mean accept responsibility and start making command decisions. Is it really fair to our passengers for a pilot to just start learning how to be a pilot-in-command?

At 1500 hours, I had roughly 1300 or so hours of TRUE pilot-in-command time. Between flying skydivers, air tours and boxes, flying both IFR and VFR, having been exposed to and dealt with paperwork, signing for the airplane, being faced with challenges of line flying as a PIC, I felt ready to delve into the AIRLINE world AS AN FO! I learned the ropes in how the airline worked; I learned from captains and COMPOUNDED on my previous experiences to formulate myself as a captain. When upgrade came, I was ready.

The problem with hiring 300 hour pilots is that they haven't formed any sort of PIC experience. Their PIC experience consists of flight school telling them it's OK to do their cross country flights, or a joyride with friends. I remember what I was like at 300 hours, and while there's no doubt I would be all over trying to get into a right seat of an airliner at that time, I feel that I would have been shorted A LOT of experience early on in my career that I find extremely beneficial to me today. In other words, my foundation as a pilot would have been that much weaker had I not had "an opportunity" to season before getting into a 121 cockpit.

That's the ultimate problem with hiring low time pilots, and that's why I think that requiring an ATP or at least ATP minimums of all regional new hires is an absolute great idea. On top of that, I would do away with SIC type ratings as well and make sure everyone gets a full PIC type rating under ATP standards even as a brand new FO new-hire.

Remember, it's not about us... it's about our passengers and clients. They deserve the best, and I think we should provide them with our best.

Salary and pay... that's another post.
I honestly don't think most people in this thread are advocating that guys with really low time should be in a 121 cockpit. I know I'm not. My responses were simply in reply to the idea that regional aircraft should be avoided at all costs, which is what Mason32 is advocating.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 05:46 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
Oh, and only taking a partial sentence out of context to try and make your point just weakens your arguement to anybody taking the time to read the actual posts.
Well, you can PM me an email, and I can forward you the EXACT copy that was sent to my inbox if you wish.

Originally Posted by Mason32
I wasn't talking about all accidents, there are hundreds every year where the crew did nothing wrong... most of the time it's injuries due to severe turbulence... that does not change the fact that the most recent fatal accidents have ALL been regionals. Argue all you want, facts are facts.
I am not talking about ground crews that walked into running jet engines either... so, when you look at the lists, take the time to read the summary.
AGAIN, you dismiss my points. I am talking about accidents, not those involving ground crew, etc. YOUR argument is that the regional airlines are unsafe due to the crews. So in your whole "7 out of the last 8" thing, two of those accidents stand out as it relates to regional crews. Or rather, how the crews had NOTHING to do with it. You aren't accepting that fact, and you dismiss it.

Here, with IP's help we can clue you in;

Originally Posted by NightIP
P.S.: The B1900 above was an accident caused by maintenance, not crew competency.
And if you do some research, you might find that to be the case of the other one.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 06:01 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Son of Chuck
How about 2500 hr's. That would be somewhere around 1000 hr's instructing plus maybe another 1.5 - 2 yr's real world experience flying boxes, pax, lab work,etc. I know not all people would would get out of instructing at 135 min's to build time, but I believe enough would to advance their careers. I am not bashing CFI's, just pointing out how very controled the environment is in which they work. Just a thought.


Living the dream, one nightmare at a time
Considering the fact that no regional has crashed with a pilot under 2200 hours, that indicates that the 2200-5000 hour pilots are the problem.

So...I think if we make the law 2500 hours, it should be retroactive.

Fire every regional pilot who didn't CFI for 1000 hours and then fly 1.5-2 years of boxes/labwork/135. They need to go hit the pattern, master steep turns, and interpret weather for their 50nm cross countries.

It's the only way to make the regionals safer. Once they've gone back and learned the basics, they can reapply for the jobs they are so dangerously performing at now.

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
At 1500 hours, I had roughly 1300 or so hours of TRUE pilot-in-command time. Between flying skydivers, air tours and boxes, flying both IFR and VFR, having been exposed to and dealt with paperwork, signing for the airplane, being faced with challenges of line flying as a PIC, I felt ready to delve into the AIRLINE world AS AN FO! I learned the ropes in how the airline worked; I learned from captains and COMPOUNDED on my previous experiences to formulate myself as a captain. When upgrade came, I was ready.
According to this thread, you weren't even close to ready. 1500 hours is just getting started. You need to take a COLA and go pick up a CFI job to experience all the things real pilots learned before their first 121 job. I need to know what major you work for so I remember not to let my family fly on it.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 06:21 PM
  #76  
Inverted
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: CL65 CA
Default

Originally Posted by sidelinesam
I'm not sure how to take the tone of your post, but is it really necessary to have two sets of years picking up a clearance? That was my whole point - that as an FO you should know how to pick it up and be able to set-up for that clearance without having to have your hand held! By the time you make it to an airline, there are certain porcedures that should be able to be accomplished without consulting the AIM, methinks!
you should take it as I think your safety culture at your airline is unsafe and unacceptable if you all practice having only one set of ears listening and writing down a clearance over radio. PDC is one thing, but when you are picking up a clearance out of airports with RNAV departures to certain runways and initial fixes based on those runways, you are setting yourself up for a deviation or worse. With one person picking up clearance, i don't care if the captain picks it up and the FO is doing the walk around, you are just rolling the dice. We are all susceptible to mishearing or writing down the wrong thing. Thanks for the intro to the airlines, luckily I work for one that doesn't allow only one crew member to be present to pick up clearance.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 07:32 PM
  #77  
The Stig's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Ford GT, Right Seat
Default

Originally Posted by Clocks
Considering the fact that no regional has crashed with a pilot under 2200 hours, that indicates that the 2200-5000 hour pilots are the problem.

So...I think if we make the law 2500 hours, it should be retroactive.

Fire every regional pilot who didn't CFI for 1000 hours and then fly 1.5-2 years of boxes/labwork/135. They need to go hit the pattern, master steep turns, and interpret weather for their 50nm cross countries.

It's the only way to make the regionals safer. Once they've gone back and learned the basics, they can reapply for the jobs they are so dangerously performing at now.


According to this thread, you weren't even close to ready. 1500 hours is just getting started. You need to take a COLA and go pick up a CFI job to experience all the things real pilots learned before their first 121 job. I need to know what major you work for so I remember not to let my family fly on it.

There is so much anger, and clearly obvious jealousy in your post it is amusing.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 07:36 PM
  #78  
Freightpuppy's Avatar
Freightmama!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 0
From: 757/767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by heading180
Easy for us to say it's a great idea now that most of us have in excess of 1500 hours. How would you feel about it if you had just earned your CMEL or CFI. It would seem like a very dim light at the end of the tunnel.
If someone is not willing to flight instruct for 1200 hours or so (assuming you have 300 hours when you get your CFI) to get on with a regional, you don't deserve to be an airline pilot anyway.

It sucks to have to babysit a spiky haired, Iphone texting (during taxi nonetheless!), nonchecklist reading, cocky for no reason airline "pilot". I say 1500 hours should be the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM!
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 07:52 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by The Stig
There is so much anger, and clearly obvious jealousy in your post it is amusing.
lol, clearly misinterpreted.

I think 1500 hours would be a good thing. This thread just kills me though.

The 1600 hour pilot says "1500 hours should be the minimum!"

The 2600 hour pilot says "no 1500 isn't enough! it should be 2500!"

And you have your sprinkling of more experienced pilots who "wont put their families on regionals because of the 300 hour pilots", when in fact its the 2200-5000 hour+ folks (who could easily be sitting next to them at CAL or SWA) who are balling up perfectly good airplanes.
Reply
Old 09-20-2009 | 07:53 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Freightpuppy
It sucks to have to babysit a spiky haired, Iphone texting (during taxi nonetheless!), nonchecklist reading, cocky for no reason airline "pilot". I say 1500 hours should be the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM!
How about acting like you're in charge and telling him how things are going to happen on your trip together?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
buffmike80
Major
57
09-23-2009 07:04 AM
colinflyin
Regional
48
09-12-2009 10:21 AM
n287hg
Regional
69
05-30-2009 01:36 PM
jetguy
Flight Schools and Training
5
08-13-2008 05:38 AM
TheOak
Fractional
7
08-03-2008 12:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices