Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Lynx killed off

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2010 | 06:51 AM
  #71  
Logbook...
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Default

Kinda funny that back during the Southwest vs RAH deal, it was said that "Southwest was looking closely at Lynx".

Maybe now Southwest needs to "look closely" at that certificate.
Reply
Old 02-05-2010 | 06:56 AM
  #72  
David Watts's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by FL450
CJC already has been out to DEN once to present the Q to United at their request I wouldn't be surprised if they did pick them up and begin service by the end of the year.

Good luck to all the Lynx guys as I talked to a few good friends last night who work there and I must say BB is an a** h***!
Except the Q will be flown by Colgan out there after the CAL/UAL merger of course.
Reply
Old 02-05-2010 | 07:40 AM
  #73  
meeko031's Avatar
alchemist
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
mainline=more higher paying jobs and better QOL.
why only mainline? Why not also improve QOL and pay at the regionals?
Reply
Old 02-05-2010 | 07:45 AM
  #74  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,889
Likes: 127
Default

Originally Posted by meeko031
why only mainline? Why not also improve QOL and pay at the regionals?
There's no reason to not improve QOL and pay at regionals...those goals aren't mutually exclusive.

Still doesn't change the fact (and TD's point) that mainline jobs (on the whole and on average) pay better than regional jobs, and have better QOL.

Short term sacrifice (mainline taking back regional flying, and regionals losing jobs because of it) will come with long-term benefits (more mainline jobs in the future).
Reply
Old 02-05-2010 | 08:00 AM
  #75  
Da808er's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Default

Send those birds to Hawaii. Those Qs are perfect for island hopping. That would kill off that low budget sinking toy Blo! jet operation that is probably hanging on by a thin thread anyway. That would give one a**h*** CEO a taste of his own medicine from another a**h*** CEO.
Reply
Old 02-05-2010 | 08:02 AM
  #76  
paxhauler85's Avatar
*********
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Da808er
Send those birds to Hawaii. Those Qs are perfect for island hopping. That would kill off that low budget sinking toy Blo! jet operation that is probably hanging on by a thin thread anyway. That would give one a**h*** CEO a taste of his own medicine from another a**h*** CEO.
BB and JO are already in business out there together. Joint venture.

And its Go!, not the scab airline = GoJet.
Reply
Old 02-05-2010 | 08:09 AM
  #77  
meeko031's Avatar
alchemist
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Short term sacrifice (mainline taking back regional flying, and regionals losing jobs because of it) will come with long-term benefits (more mainline jobs in the future).
Im all for sacrifice to better everything for the future but the guys here at eagle in the right seat for 8+ years have a different definition of short term.

Maybe I just don't get it. Why not make my time in the regionals more enjoybale and rewarding by improving qol, pay and schedule instead of treating it as a stepping stone. If some decide to stay and make a career out of the regionals, why not. QOL is more important for me than the type of thin foil im flying.

More mainline jobs in the future; that future is not so promising.

just my opinion, no need to throw knives at me!!!
Reply
Old 02-05-2010 | 08:14 AM
  #78  
Da808er's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by paxhauler85
BB and JO are already in business out there together. Joint venture.

And its Go!, not the scab airline = GoJet.
Don't need to explain any details to me my friend. I'm on the street with your sinking ship and obviously just showing my frustrations about it. Capish?
Reply
Old 02-05-2010 | 09:03 AM
  #79  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
There's no reason to not improve QOL and pay at regionals...those goals aren't mutually exclusive.

Still doesn't change the fact (and TD's point) that mainline jobs (on the whole and on average) pay better than regional jobs, and have better QOL.

Short term sacrifice (mainline taking back regional flying, and regionals losing jobs because of it) will come with long-term benefits (more mainline jobs in the future).
Bingo. No regional pilot should want an increase in flying at the expense of mainline jobs. If 100 aircraft move from regional to a mainline then that's attrition at the regional level and higher paying jobs at the mainline level. Now is RAH mainline? You be the judge but currently I'm not feeling it. A new contract could completely turn everything around though. Regardless what some say here the council is working their tails off on that matter. Nothing happens overnight but for once there will be an airline with both regional and mainline feed on the same list and that should play out well for negotiations. Time will tell of course but I'm cautiously optimistic.
Reply
Old 02-05-2010 | 09:06 AM
  #80  
Dirty Rat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
Bingo. No regional pilot should want an increase in flying at the expense of mainline jobs. If 100 aircraft move from regional to a mainline then that's attrition at the regional level and higher paying jobs at the mainline level. Now is RAH mainline? You be the judge but currently I'm not feeling it.
pot...meet kettle.....

Your post should have started out as: No regional pilot except Republic pilots, should want an increase in flying at the expense of mainline jobs. Look in the mirror. You and yours are the replacements. You are the problem. You are the reason Lynx pilots are losing their jobs.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
airdett
Part 135
11
07-10-2009 04:47 AM
SurferLucas
Part 135
12
07-03-2009 05:49 AM
Rsrv4ever
Regional
4
04-18-2009 05:37 AM
lear 31 pilot
Regional
6
03-13-2009 11:02 AM
Ozpilot414
Regional
5
02-17-2009 06:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices