Eagle Life
#5541
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
If you look at my post history, you'll find several recent posts where I acknowledge not all Eagle pilots are of the same cloth. My referring to Wingtips as your pal, wasn't necessarily implying you have a "high-five mentality", it was a reference to possible sympathy as a fellow Eagle pilot despite his transgressions. Is it possible you are generalizing me ?
At eagle right now we are at least lucky the FAA passed rest rules that will require more pilots. They also passed the 1500 hour rule. Also there seems to be an ongoing hiring binge, and the only new applicants are those who are tainted, or are just coming out of the CFI job pipeline. These applicants are not filling all the regional job openings anymore.
I saw someone post something about the new rest rules require 4000 new pilots, I hope that is true. I also hope that if we get more 70 seat jets at AE, that we can just merge the list, because they will be replacing MD80 flying IMO, and I would hope no one has to furlough, either AA or AE. I do not think any 90 seat jets are coming to Eagle, it seems to me that APA will not back down on them, and I do not think a judge is going to impose that. I have also heard a 'rumor' that if it goes to the judge, that he can not actually impose scope language. I doubt they will put 90 seat jets at AA either, because it cost too much to have all other aspects of that flights operations handled by AA. Its why I do not understand the logic of not merging the two groups, but I am just a kid right?
I saw someone post something about the new rest rules require 4000 new pilots, I hope that is true. I also hope that if we get more 70 seat jets at AE, that we can just merge the list, because they will be replacing MD80 flying IMO, and I would hope no one has to furlough, either AA or AE. I do not think any 90 seat jets are coming to Eagle, it seems to me that APA will not back down on them, and I do not think a judge is going to impose that. I have also heard a 'rumor' that if it goes to the judge, that he can not actually impose scope language. I doubt they will put 90 seat jets at AA either, because it cost too much to have all other aspects of that flights operations handled by AA. Its why I do not understand the logic of not merging the two groups, but I am just a kid right?
I too have read the argument about that scope language, but I'm not convinced. It may or may not be. The best solution is a negotiated one with everyone winning as much as possible. As it stands now, if AMR rams that term sheet down out throats, it will only push the pilots to nuzzle up to Parker or someone else and I think the primary goal then will then be to sell those down the river who sold us down the river....even at our own expense. If Parker wins or scenario B., which is the "nulclear option" (that being the pilot group goes nuclear with mass resignations, etc.), then AA is fragmented or liquidates and then since One World has no U.S. presence, it too will likely collapse. If the term sheet or anything close to that becomes reality, then even AMR will lose control of the situation, exclusivity or not.
#5542
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From: forever fo
If oneworld lost AA, why not get USAIR to join and back them fiscally? USair could pick up the useful parts of the demise?
USAIR is still star alliance correct? How do they fit into that at all, I think its just leftover from their UAL merger idea in 2000.
You really want to get scared about merger noise? Get scared when Usair joins oneworld.
USAIR is still star alliance correct? How do they fit into that at all, I think its just leftover from their UAL merger idea in 2000.
You really want to get scared about merger noise? Get scared when Usair joins oneworld.
#5543
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
If oneworld lost AA, why not get USAIR to join and back them fiscally? USair could pick up the useful parts of the demise?
USAIR is still star alliance correct? How do they fit into that at all, I think its just leftover from their UAL merger idea in 2000.
You really want to get scared about merger noise? Get scared when Usair joins oneworld.
USAIR is still star alliance correct? How do they fit into that at all, I think its just leftover from their UAL merger idea in 2000.
You really want to get scared about merger noise? Get scared when Usair joins oneworld.
If AA and U merge, it will could very well be disastrous for those at Eagle.
#5544
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From: forever fo
If U and AA are truly destined to end up in bed together, it will matter little whether U's joining One World occurs first or last. Parker still has to get around clauses in USAPA's CBA regarding VERY expensive pay rate snapbacks should U merge. If U isn't the controlling entity in any merge, U owes USAPA another 250 million on top of thT supposedly.
If AA and U merge, it will could very well be disastrous for those at Eagle.
If AA and U merge, it will could very well be disastrous for those at Eagle.
#5545
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
That trimming would be far quicker then a few years IMO.
#5546
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From: forever fo
Look how long UA/CA is taking, and they still have not combined anything pilot/fleet wise. Also its not like Expressjet has gone anywhere either, size wise.
I mean seriously, US/AW is not even MERGED HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!
If anything they would be better to run them separate for a few years and let all the guys on top retire, its half of both airlines. Then it would be an easy mix together with those who are left. At that point everyone is going to be hiring anyway. Eventually this stuff has to move fairly quickly like its 1999 again. The longer this all takes, the better for Eagle. AA might be forced to merge the list just to get people to work at Eagle.
It really makes a ton of sense to me at least to just merge the list, its good for everyone long term. AA pilots could fly the Eagle 90 seaters and avoid furloughing. Eagle pilots in a few years would be flying AA planes anyway since the pilot group is so old. AMR would not have to deal with the pilot shortage since people would gladly fly the RJ knowing they are on the same list as AA.
Now only this was a more shared ideal.
Instead Eagle/AA guys won't even make eye contact in the airports anymore.
#5547
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
I suppose we'll have to wait till the 21st to get glimpse of the future, eh ?
#5549
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From: forever fo
ya eaglefly we will see.
You have to remember too though at NW, both Compass and Mesaba were owned by the company. Also at DL ASA was owned by DL. I am not sure but I think when CAL did CH11 in the 90s ExpressJet was owned by them.
The cycle is changing this decade though, its not going to look like the last 10 years, if you can't think this way, your just going to keep saying oh wow I didnt see that coming. The tides have changed for a new cycle.
You have to remember too though at NW, both Compass and Mesaba were owned by the company. Also at DL ASA was owned by DL. I am not sure but I think when CAL did CH11 in the 90s ExpressJet was owned by them.
The cycle is changing this decade though, its not going to look like the last 10 years, if you can't think this way, your just going to keep saying oh wow I didnt see that coming. The tides have changed for a new cycle.
#5550
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
ya eaglefly we will see.
You have to remember too though at NW, both Compass and Mesaba were owned by the company. Also at DL ASA was owned by DL. I am not sure but I think when CAL did CH11 in the 90s ExpressJet was owned by them.
The cycle is changing this decade though, its not going to look like the last 10 years, if you can't think this way, your just going to keep saying oh wow I didnt see that coming. The tides have changed for a new cycle.
You have to remember too though at NW, both Compass and Mesaba were owned by the company. Also at DL ASA was owned by DL. I am not sure but I think when CAL did CH11 in the 90s ExpressJet was owned by them.
The cycle is changing this decade though, its not going to look like the last 10 years, if you can't think this way, your just going to keep saying oh wow I didnt see that coming. The tides have changed for a new cycle.
At any rate, silly me.
Last edited by eaglefly; 03-14-2012 at 06:32 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



