Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

CRW Overrun Transcript

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2010 | 04:46 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by yamahas3
Thrust levers physically at auto causes spoilers to deploy. Actual fan speed above 77.9% causes the config warning. The engines don't spool down as fast as you bring the levers back, therefore for a split second you get the config warning.


It looks like this crew tried really hard to kill themselves and were saved by the complete luck of having EMAS at the end. Any other airport and this would've been another Colgan 3407 aftermath.
That is what I thought...forgot the specifics and I wasn't about to look for the book.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 05:00 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

I don't see anything wrong with having a conversation while waiting for a PDC with the brakes set, although getting your stories straight would probably be better done outside of earshot from the CVR.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 05:36 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TurboDog
I am all for getting paid more and I thing we should be. However, if we can't do the job professionally now, why do you think paying us more money will make us more of a professional?

Because if you lose your airline pilot job and you can replace your income by working sales, or construction, or the equivalent then it makes it a little less likely to attract and keep professionals. Can a doctor or a dentist say the same thing? Despite what many people say, pay is a motivator. It is for me. And it is for most people.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 06:02 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by nigelcobalt
Because if you lose your airline pilot job and you can replace your income by working sales, or construction, or the equivalent then it makes it a little less likely to attract and keep professionals. Can a doctor or a dentist say the same thing? Despite what many people say, pay is a motivator. It is for me. And it is for most people.
What was the outcome for the crew with PSA?
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 06:04 PM
  #25  
afterburn81's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 12
From: A320
Default

I guess in contrast with some of the other threads in the forums these days the real question is, were these pilots fairly low time? What was their training background? Were there any fatigue issues with the crew?

I wonder what would have happened had the F.O. NOT moved the flaps while in a t/o configuration. The warning ultimately caused them to abort the t/o at a speed that caused them to overrun the runway but not by much. I'm not sure of the runway length but I would imagine they would have been able to lift off before they reached the end had neither of them noticed the flaps were not set correctly. But if this was a relatively short runway or a runway with some clearance issues at the departure end, things may have been pretty bad. I know one way is a little hilly and one way there is a big drop off. Gotta wonder what that would have done to get the FAA moving with some changes.

Just some food for thought.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 06:12 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Default

FMI:

CD List Of Contents
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 06:45 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
I guess in contrast with some of the other threads in the forums these days the real question is, were these pilots fairly low time? What was their training background? Were there any fatigue issues with the crew?
Captain
Total time: 9,525 hours
CL-65 time: 4,608

FO
Total time: 3,029 hours
CL-65 time: 1,981

According to the report, no training problems, no failures, and no fatigue issues.

Originally Posted by afterburn81
I wonder what would have happened had the F.O. NOT moved the flaps while in a t/o configuration. I'm not sure of the runway length but I would imagine they would have been able to lift off before they reached the end had neither of them noticed the flaps were not set correctly.
Well, from the CVR ...
16:09:02 - takeoff data forty four thousand pounds. flaps eight twenty seven twenty
eight thirty four seventy three eighty seven point eight set.
It was the captain who moved the flaps. Based solely on the speed book, it looks like their data was based on flaps 20, but the FO had flaps 8 in his head. How much of an actual difference is there between flaps 20 and flaps 8 speeds when the numbers come across the ACARS? Based on the speed book, there is only about a 10 kt difference. According to the FDR, the highest recorded ground speed was 142 kts.

Last edited by BigFellor; 04-08-2010 at 06:46 PM. Reason: Add link to FDR data
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 06:58 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: left seat regional
Default

I for one hope they didn't get canned for it. Yes there were definite things wrong with what they did but could happen to many of us. And you can bet they'd never make that mistake again - and will probably take sterile cockpit and checklists (and double checking) more seriously from now on. Probably more seiously than just about anyone now. Retrain - life goes on. And thank god no lives were lost. Airplanes can be repaired and replaced, egos and pride are done some good by being bruised (or severely beaten!) sometimes. They learned their lessons - and did it for many of us who read the CVR as well.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 07:37 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

I wasn't saying they got canned. Nor do I think they should be. I have no idea what happened to them.

I just think a lot of us don't treat this job with the respect it deserves 100% of the time, myself included of course. There are things we can all do to improve.
Reply
Old 04-08-2010 | 08:32 PM
  #30  
minimwage4's Avatar
2 days off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: Embraer Systems Analyst
Default

Originally Posted by nigelcobalt
I wasn't saying they got canned. Nor do I think they should be.

.
You're joking right? The CA said "I don't know what to do" after they went off. ALPA to the rescue.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Florida Flyer
PSA Airlines
116
02-16-2010 03:34 AM
N118NW
Hangar Talk
27
06-01-2009 07:42 AM
jfly
Regional
0
04-16-2009 12:03 PM
Scoop
Mergers and Acquisitions
119
10-27-2008 12:02 PM
Carl Spackler
Mergers and Acquisitions
6
10-25-2008 07:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices