CRW Overrun Transcript
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Thrust levers physically at auto causes spoilers to deploy. Actual fan speed above 77.9% causes the config warning. The engines don't spool down as fast as you bring the levers back, therefore for a split second you get the config warning.
It looks like this crew tried really hard to kill themselves and were saved by the complete luck of having EMAS at the end. Any other airport and this would've been another Colgan 3407 aftermath.
It looks like this crew tried really hard to kill themselves and were saved by the complete luck of having EMAS at the end. Any other airport and this would've been another Colgan 3407 aftermath.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Because if you lose your airline pilot job and you can replace your income by working sales, or construction, or the equivalent then it makes it a little less likely to attract and keep professionals. Can a doctor or a dentist say the same thing? Despite what many people say, pay is a motivator. It is for me. And it is for most people.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Because if you lose your airline pilot job and you can replace your income by working sales, or construction, or the equivalent then it makes it a little less likely to attract and keep professionals. Can a doctor or a dentist say the same thing? Despite what many people say, pay is a motivator. It is for me. And it is for most people.
#25
I guess in contrast with some of the other threads in the forums these days the real question is, were these pilots fairly low time? What was their training background? Were there any fatigue issues with the crew?
I wonder what would have happened had the F.O. NOT moved the flaps while in a t/o configuration. The warning ultimately caused them to abort the t/o at a speed that caused them to overrun the runway but not by much. I'm not sure of the runway length but I would imagine they would have been able to lift off before they reached the end had neither of them noticed the flaps were not set correctly. But if this was a relatively short runway or a runway with some clearance issues at the departure end, things may have been pretty bad. I know one way is a little hilly and one way there is a big drop off. Gotta wonder what that would have done to get the FAA moving with some changes.
Just some food for thought.
I wonder what would have happened had the F.O. NOT moved the flaps while in a t/o configuration. The warning ultimately caused them to abort the t/o at a speed that caused them to overrun the runway but not by much. I'm not sure of the runway length but I would imagine they would have been able to lift off before they reached the end had neither of them noticed the flaps were not set correctly. But if this was a relatively short runway or a runway with some clearance issues at the departure end, things may have been pretty bad. I know one way is a little hilly and one way there is a big drop off. Gotta wonder what that would have done to get the FAA moving with some changes.
Just some food for thought.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Total time: 9,525 hours
CL-65 time: 4,608
FO
Total time: 3,029 hours
CL-65 time: 1,981
According to the report, no training problems, no failures, and no fatigue issues.
I wonder what would have happened had the F.O. NOT moved the flaps while in a t/o configuration. I'm not sure of the runway length but I would imagine they would have been able to lift off before they reached the end had neither of them noticed the flaps were not set correctly.
16:09:02 - takeoff data forty four thousand pounds. flaps eight twenty seven twenty
eight thirty four seventy three eighty seven point eight set.
eight thirty four seventy three eighty seven point eight set.
Last edited by BigFellor; 04-08-2010 at 06:46 PM. Reason: Add link to FDR data
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: left seat regional
I for one hope they didn't get canned for it. Yes there were definite things wrong with what they did but could happen to many of us. And you can bet they'd never make that mistake again - and will probably take sterile cockpit and checklists (and double checking) more seriously from now on. Probably more seiously than just about anyone now. Retrain - life goes on. And thank god no lives were lost. Airplanes can be repaired and replaced, egos and pride are done some good by being bruised (or severely beaten!) sometimes. They learned their lessons - and did it for many of us who read the CVR as well.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
I wasn't saying they got canned. Nor do I think they should be. I have no idea what happened to them.
I just think a lot of us don't treat this job with the respect it deserves 100% of the time, myself included of course. There are things we can all do to improve.
I just think a lot of us don't treat this job with the respect it deserves 100% of the time, myself included of course. There are things we can all do to improve.
#30
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



