Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Skywest opens IAH base

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2010 | 07:20 AM
  #71  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MatchPoint
There, I helped correct your tunnel vision. I also removed "XJT routes" as they do not have any routes since they belong to CAL errrr UAL. Also remember that XJT will be back filling SKW in ORD and DEN.
Alright, I agree that this is "new United" making this change - not SKYW. I was just trying to explain why the CAL guys are so upset about this "re-alignment".

OK, so how about this - If you SKYW guys would get your heads out of the sand and join the ASA/XJT group, then this whole shift of flying would virtually displace nobody. You might have to change aircraft to stay in your base, but I am sure that most people would rather do that than move.

And don't start with your 70 seaters are better than our 50 seaters. The pay is virtually the same (+/- a couple of bucks depending on seat and longevity). I think that I can speak for most - definitely not all - but most of the XJT guys and say that we're not salivating to fly your 700's just because it is a bigger airplane.
Reply
Old 11-03-2010 | 07:24 AM
  #72  
Slaphappy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Floridaflipper
Alright, I agree that this is "new United" making this change - not SKYW. I was just trying to explain why the CAL guys are so upset about this "re-alignment".

OK, so how about this - If you SKYW guys would get your heads out of the sand and join the ASA/XJT group, then this whole shift of flying would virtually displace nobody. You might have to change aircraft to stay in your base, but I am sure that most people would rather do that than move.

And don't start with your 70 seaters are better than our 50 seaters. The pay is virtually the same (+/- a couple of bucks depending on seat and longevity). I think that I can speak for most - definitely not all - but most of the XJT guys and say that we're not salivating to fly your 700's just because it is a bigger airplane.
The flying isn't going to displace anyone. They are being very fluid with the numbers they want in IAH and MSP 60 to 100 in IAH and 30 to 70 in MSP. THey won't displace anyone. Now if we do join alpa and and xjt/asa people will get displaced and lose senoirty
Reply
Old 11-03-2010 | 07:33 AM
  #73  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
The flying isn't going to displace anyone. They are being very fluid with the numbers they want in IAH and MSP 60 to 100 in IAH and 30 to 70 in MSP. THey won't displace anyone.
That's not what some of your guys are saying. As far as the XJT side goes, there will be displacements - lots of them.



Originally Posted by Slaphappy
Now if we do join alpa and and xjt/asa people will get displaced and lose senoirty
I completely do not understand what you are trying to say here.
Reply
Old 11-03-2010 | 07:36 AM
  #74  
Slaphappy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Floridaflipper
That's not what some of your guys are saying. As far as the XJT side goes, there will be displcements - lots of them.
We're not xjt and people don't have the information. They need to read their e-mail and read the ishare what Klenn wrote.
Reply
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:10 AM
  #75  
MatchPoint's Avatar
Rollin'
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: AA Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
The flying isn't going to displace anyone. They are being very fluid with the numbers they want in IAH and MSP 60 to 100 in IAH and 30 to 70 in MSP. THey won't displace anyone. Now if we do join alpa and and xjt/asa people will get displaced and lose senoirty
You are wrong, total numbers and possible displacements according to the company:

IAH:
CA’s = 100
FO’s = 100
FA’s = 200
TT # = 400 (200 pilots)

MSP:
CA’s = 70
FO’s = 70
FA’s = 70
TT # = 210 (140 pilots)

Overall there is a potential for 610 (340 pilots) displacements at SKW. Look at the standing bids and you can tell that 90+% of the pilots who have IAH or MSP in the bid don’t have either one as their #1 but 3rd or 4th down the list.
Reply
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:17 AM
  #76  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MatchPoint
You are wrong.
Come now, we all know that Slaphappy is NEVER wrong.
Reply
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:18 AM
  #77  
duvie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
From: WB Bunkie
Default

Originally Posted by MatchPoint
Look at the standing bids and you can tell that 90+% of the pilots who have IAH or MSP in the bid don’t have either one as their #1 but 3rd or 4th down the list.
I'd check the standing bid list again mate. There are plenty of guys bidding for both. They'll have to displace some, no doubt, but its not nearly as many as I would've thought. Furthermore, more people will put in for it by the 15th.
Reply
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:19 AM
  #78  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,150
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
The flying isn't going to displace anyone. They are being very fluid with the numbers they want in IAH and MSP 60 to 100 in IAH and 30 to 70 in MSP. THey won't displace anyone.
I THINK they are making an honest attempt not to displace anyone, but I don't think that's going to be possible unless they allow upgrades and transitions, along with transfers.

Even then, junior CA's might have to bid back to FO in order to stay where they want to be.

Bottom line this a raw deal for SKW and XJT pilots...

Any XJT people who think we are "stealing" your flying or actually "want" to be in IAH need a serious does of reality check. There's no growth involved, nobody is going to win except for a tiny handful of commuters who woke up one day and found out that their domicile just moved to their home town...
Reply
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:26 AM
  #79  
MatchPoint's Avatar
Rollin'
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: AA Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by Floridaflipper
Alright, I agree that this is "new United" making this change - not SKYW. I was just trying to explain why the CAL guys are so upset about this "re-alignment".

OK, so how about this - If you SKYW guys would get your heads out of the sand and join the ASA/XJT group, then this whole shift of flying would virtually displace nobody. You might have to change aircraft to stay in your base, but I am sure that most people would rather do that than move.

And don't start with your 70 seaters are better than our 50 seaters. The pay is virtually the same (+/- a couple of bucks depending on seat and longevity). I think that I can speak for most - definitely not all - but most of the XJT guys and say that we're not salivating to fly your 700's just because it is a bigger airplane.
FWIW, I respect your opinions and we mostly see eye to eye when emotions are removed.

Not all XJT pilots are p1ssed about IAH, I know a few friends of mine who live on the westcoast and are very excited about the potential for DEN, LAX or SFO. I’m certain that there are more than just the two of them.

Please don't fall prey to the "mine is better" mindset. Most of our a/c are 50's which compared to the XR are lacking. The 70/90's are excellent a/c but they don't pay what they should. Not many at SKW really care about flying a 70/90; they want QOL with solid benefits and respectable pay. If we all merged and biding the ERJ allowed them to live in domicile 99% would gladly transition. If you could read our internal forums you would see that there is a solid amount of our pilots who want one list for many reasons this one included.

Next, ignore Slappy. He’s a SKW extremist who had his lips surgically attached to Mgmt.’s back side. He’s anti-pilot and anti-labor. There’s an old saying I like to use when referring to posters like Slappy: “Arguing with a pilot’s like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a few hours you realize he likes it.”

Last edited by MatchPoint; 11-03-2010 at 10:04 AM.
Reply
Old 11-03-2010 | 09:49 AM
  #80  
MatchPoint's Avatar
Rollin'
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: AA Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by duvie
I'd check the standing bid list again mate. There are plenty of guys bidding for both. They'll have to displace some, no doubt, but its not nearly as many as I would've thought. Furthermore, more people will put in for it by the 15th.
Sorry my numbers were a guesstimate, I’ll just do IAH seeing that’s what we are talking about on this tread. Below are the numbers as of 11/3 at 11:38 MT.

IAH:

CA: So far there are 49 bids on the IAH list, 18 of them have IAH as their first preference, as of now it looks as if another 51 CA’s will be needed (meaning displaced) which means 82% of them don’t want IAH.

FO: So far there are 52 bids on the IAH list, 21 of them have IAH as their first preference, as of now it looks as if another 48 FO’s will be needed (meaning displaced) which means 78.5% of them don’t want IAH.

Between the two if SKW staffs IAH with 100 CA’s and 100 FO’s (according to the email), 161 pilots will be forced into IAH, that represents 80.5% of all the bids. I was somewhat close at 90%. "Horse shoes, Hand Grenades, and Aviation." Right? lol

Last edited by MatchPoint; 11-03-2010 at 10:09 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
newarkblows
Regional
265
08-12-2010 12:21 PM
Koolaidman
Regional
39
09-04-2007 09:36 PM
stanrhintx
Regional
76
11-10-2006 09:56 AM
JustAMushroom
Regional
65
07-16-2006 10:44 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices