Skywest opens IAH base
#81
You are wrong, total numbers and possible displacements according to the company:
IAH:
CA’s = 100
FO’s = 100
FA’s = 200
TT # = 400 (200 pilots)
MSP:
CA’s = 70
FO’s = 70
FA’s = 70
TT # = 210 (140 pilots)
Overall there is a potential for 610 (340 pilots) displacements at SKW. Look at the standing bids and you can tell that 90+% of the pilots who have IAH or MSP in the bid don’t have either one as their #1 but 3rd or 4th down the list.
IAH:
CA’s = 100
FO’s = 100
FA’s = 200
TT # = 400 (200 pilots)
MSP:
CA’s = 70
FO’s = 70
FA’s = 70
TT # = 210 (140 pilots)
Overall there is a potential for 610 (340 pilots) displacements at SKW. Look at the standing bids and you can tell that 90+% of the pilots who have IAH or MSP in the bid don’t have either one as their #1 but 3rd or 4th down the list.
#82
You stated:
Simple put, you were wrong.
#83
Where are you guys getting your info that this is UAL flying? Its CAL flying originating in Houston and in direct violation of our scope clause. UAL never had any IAH originating flights and the destinations your serving FROM IAH should be flown by mainline unless its 50 seats or less.
I can guaranty that you won't be sitting on many CAL jumpseats to get to and from work and if I were you, I'd ask management to rethink this? That is unless you like purposely violating other carriers contracts.
Good Luck !!
I can guaranty that you won't be sitting on many CAL jumpseats to get to and from work and if I were you, I'd ask management to rethink this? That is unless you like purposely violating other carriers contracts.
Good Luck !!
#84
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 423
Likes: 3
From: 717 FO
Where are you guys getting your info that this is UAL flying? Its CAL flying originating in Houston and in direct violation of our scope clause. UAL never had any IAH originating flights and the destinations your serving FROM IAH should be flown by mainline unless its 50 seats or less.
I can guaranty that you won't be sitting on many CAL jumpseats to get to and from work and if I were you, I'd ask management to rethink this? That is unless you like purposely violating other carriers contracts.
Good Luck !!
I can guaranty that you won't be sitting on many CAL jumpseats to get to and from work and if I were you, I'd ask management to rethink this? That is unless you like purposely violating other carriers contracts.
Good Luck !!
#85
Where are you guys getting your info that this is UAL flying? Its CAL flying originating in Houston and in direct violation of our scope clause. UAL never had any IAH originating flights and the destinations your serving FROM IAH should be flown by mainline unless its 50 seats or less.
I can guaranty that you won't be sitting on many CAL jumpseats to get to and from work and if I were you, I'd ask management to rethink this? That is unless you like purposely violating other carriers contracts.
Good Luck !!
I can guaranty that you won't be sitting on many CAL jumpseats to get to and from work and if I were you, I'd ask management to rethink this? That is unless you like purposely violating other carriers contracts.
Good Luck !!
#86
Where are you guys getting your info that this is UAL flying? Its CAL flying originating in Houston and in direct violation of our scope clause. UAL never had any IAH originating flights and the destinations your serving FROM IAH should be flown by mainline unless its 50 seats or less.
BTW... no one at SkyW wants any of this flying.
#87
Where are you guys getting your info that this is UAL flying? Its CAL flying originating in Houston and in direct violation of our scope clause. UAL never had any IAH originating flights and the destinations your serving FROM IAH should be flown by mainline unless its 50 seats or less.
I can guaranty that you won't be sitting on many CAL jumpseats to get to and from work and if I were you, I'd ask management to rethink this? That is unless you like purposely violating other carriers contracts.
Good Luck !!
I can guaranty that you won't be sitting on many CAL jumpseats to get to and from work and if I were you, I'd ask management to rethink this? That is unless you like purposely violating other carriers contracts.
Good Luck !!
The buck stops with you! Figure out how your management team plans to work around your scope and STOP IT!!!! 99% of us need you to preserve our mainline jobs because, other than you guys (CAL pilots), most mainline pilots haven’t done a good job persevering anything. I hope after the JCBA you can bring it all back in-house!
#88
Jeezus guys, whats next, are you going to ask me what the definition of "is" is?
This is CAL flying PERIOD. You are violating our scope provision by participating in this flying. For those of you contractually challenged this is a big no-no in the airline world.
So if I'm getting this right, you would purposely violate another carriers contract and just shrug your shoulder and say "oh well"????
Unfortunately for you guys, you're going to need rides on us a lot more than we need them on you and you ain't gonna be welcome on a good many CAL Captains Jumpseats.
Again, Good Luck with that and maybe one-day you'll undertstand what an enforceable contract is.
This is CAL flying PERIOD. You are violating our scope provision by participating in this flying. For those of you contractually challenged this is a big no-no in the airline world.
So if I'm getting this right, you would purposely violate another carriers contract and just shrug your shoulder and say "oh well"????
Unfortunately for you guys, you're going to need rides on us a lot more than we need them on you and you ain't gonna be welcome on a good many CAL Captains Jumpseats.
Again, Good Luck with that and maybe one-day you'll undertstand what an enforceable contract is.
#89
B f'ing S. I know you used to fly between a UAL hub and Houston and that was it. Get your facts straight and try and show me how many flights you flew from IAH to a non UAL hub using 70 seat aircraft.
#90
Jeezus guys, whats next, are you going to ask me what the definition of "is" is?
This is CAL flying PERIOD. You are violating our scope provision by participating in this flying. For those of you contractually challenged this is a big no-no in the airline world.
So if I'm getting this right, you would purposely violate another carriers contract and just shrug your shoulder and say "oh well"????
Unfortunately for you guys, you're going to need rides on us a lot more than we need them on you and you ain't gonna be welcome on a good many CAL Captains Jumpseats.
Again, Good Luck with that and maybe one-day you'll undertstand what an enforceable contract is.
This is CAL flying PERIOD. You are violating our scope provision by participating in this flying. For those of you contractually challenged this is a big no-no in the airline world.
So if I'm getting this right, you would purposely violate another carriers contract and just shrug your shoulder and say "oh well"????
Unfortunately for you guys, you're going to need rides on us a lot more than we need them on you and you ain't gonna be welcome on a good many CAL Captains Jumpseats.
Again, Good Luck with that and maybe one-day you'll undertstand what an enforceable contract is.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



