ASA/XJT JCBA: No Dual Qual!
#11
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Delta Gear Slinger
Posts: 415
We need to have dual qual. Separate lists are very inefficient. No other airline in the industry has separate lists for the 200/700/900. Even Jazz in Canada has their pilots fly all three. The pilot group has to be reasonable here. As long as the pilot group is reasonably compensated by management
Let's say we do entertain dual qual. Under what conditions would we accept these terms? I would need the blended rate to be heavily in favor of the larger aircraft. Any other ideas? The way I see it, dual qual is a concession on the part of the pilots because of the reduced staffing. Do we really want to reduce our staffing requirements even more than what PBS will accomplish?
Under the right conditions, I'd vote in favor of dual qual. It's not about the airplane itself, as I'm not even a 700 driver anymore, but the quality of life issues. Example, I'd lose quite a bit of seniority in my seat should we move to dual qual, as would most 200 captains. No bueno, which is why I'd want za blended rate favoring the 700. There are other issues that concern me, but I'll wait until I don't have to fight with my retarded phone to continue.
What else do you guys want in the JCBA?
#12
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 61
Vacation/Ready Reserve
Something else we lost in our last contract that we need to get back is being able to maximize time off with vacation. Under our previous contract, any trip that touched vacation could be dropped without affecting pay. I understand this is the way the XJT contract still is. Under our current contract, if you choose to drop the portion of trips that fall outside of your vacation, you can see your pay reduced significantly below min guarantee. More than a few pilots here learned this the hard way when they got a fraction of their normal paycheck after bidding their vacation month without this knowledge.
On another note, the Ready Reserve rules need to be tightened up and brought more in line with XJT's. Line holders complain about a three hour sit of "airport appreciation"... Try an eight hour sit up to six times a month seemingly assigned at the whim of Crew Scheduling!
On another note, the Ready Reserve rules need to be tightened up and brought more in line with XJT's. Line holders complain about a three hour sit of "airport appreciation"... Try an eight hour sit up to six times a month seemingly assigned at the whim of Crew Scheduling!
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 717 FO
Posts: 391
I really like being dual qualified because it maximizes my schedule flexibility and I have a better chance of getting the days off that I want. Just don't adopt the same "Brad Holt Override" that we have!
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 330
Comair, Mesaba, Pinnacle don't have dual Qual.
Those figures are in Canadian Dollars, but yes, the pay is significantly more than what US regional's pay their FOs when you do the conversion.
1st year - US $39
2nd year - US $44
3rd year - US $51
It would be nice to see that kind of pay or get close to that kind of pay. Some of the others things I'd like to see down here in the US that Jazz was able to do...
Minimum days off: Lineholders: 14; Reserve: 12
Overtime: 150% pay over 85 hours/mo
I think it'll remain a dream unfortunately...
Those figures are in Canadian Dollars, but yes, the pay is significantly more than what US regional's pay their FOs when you do the conversion.
1st year - US $39
2nd year - US $44
3rd year - US $51
It would be nice to see that kind of pay or get close to that kind of pay. Some of the others things I'd like to see down here in the US that Jazz was able to do...
Minimum days off: Lineholders: 14; Reserve: 12
Overtime: 150% pay over 85 hours/mo
I think it'll remain a dream unfortunately...
#15
You guys will want Dual Qual. It greatly enhances YOUR schedule flexibility and QOL. Of course you should have appropriate rates for each aircraft, with a blended rate used ONLY for vacation, training, etc. It also makes your company more efficient, just in case anyone plans on sticking around for the long-term.
It's not a safety problem IMO. Airbus and B75/76 drivers have been doing this for longer than we have...
But watch out for super-senior types...they will want no DQ so they can lock in the best rate for themselves, and apply it to all non-flight pay as well. Leaving junior folks to suck it up on a disproportionally lower rate on the 200 of course.
It's not a safety problem IMO. Airbus and B75/76 drivers have been doing this for longer than we have...
But watch out for super-senior types...they will want no DQ so they can lock in the best rate for themselves, and apply it to all non-flight pay as well. Leaving junior folks to suck it up on a disproportionally lower rate on the 200 of course.
Just want to point out that Pinnacle, Mesaba, and Comair do not have dual qual.
Let's say we do entertain dual qual. Under what conditions would we accept these terms? I would need the blended rate to be heavily in favor of the larger aircraft. Any other ideas? The way I see it, dual qual is a concession on the part of the pilots because of the reduced staffing. Do we really want to reduce our staffing requirements even more than what PBS will accomplish?
Under the right conditions, I'd vote in favor of dual qual. It's not about the airplane itself, as I'm not even a 700 driver anymore, but the quality of life issues. Example, I'd lose quite a bit of seniority in my seat should we move to dual qual, as would most 200 captains. No bueno, which is why I'd want za blended rate favoring the 700. There are other issues that concern me, but I'll wait until I don't have to fight with my retarded phone to continue.
What else do you guys want in the JCBA?
Let's say we do entertain dual qual. Under what conditions would we accept these terms? I would need the blended rate to be heavily in favor of the larger aircraft. Any other ideas? The way I see it, dual qual is a concession on the part of the pilots because of the reduced staffing. Do we really want to reduce our staffing requirements even more than what PBS will accomplish?
Under the right conditions, I'd vote in favor of dual qual. It's not about the airplane itself, as I'm not even a 700 driver anymore, but the quality of life issues. Example, I'd lose quite a bit of seniority in my seat should we move to dual qual, as would most 200 captains. No bueno, which is why I'd want za blended rate favoring the 700. There are other issues that concern me, but I'll wait until I don't have to fight with my retarded phone to continue.
What else do you guys want in the JCBA?
Like others have stated, I believe your QOL will most likely improve with dual qual due to increased schedule flexibility. Imagine being able to fly a United 200 trip with long overnights in Chicago or NYC one week then flying a 700/900 trip the next week with a long Toronto or Key West? The schedules will just be able to get that much better.
As far a payrate, the pilot group should absolutely not accept a "Brad Holt Override" for Dual Qual. I am strongly in favor of a blended payrate based on a percentage ratio of 200 to 700/900 aircraft. The new JCBA 200 payrate used in the blended payrate should be at least what current 700/900 pay is and the new JCBA 700/900 rates higher than the 200 JCBA rate.
Of course payrates is just a small part of the picture as other contractual issues like recurrent checkride switcheroos between 200 and 700/900 will have to accounted for
#16
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 330
Dual qual is coming I can almost promise that. Saves a load of money for the company.
Maybe a combination of PBS and dual qual would help us grow in some ways but who knows. Price is right is on I am gonna go watch the models show off a vacuum cleaner or something.
Later fella's
Maybe a combination of PBS and dual qual would help us grow in some ways but who knows. Price is right is on I am gonna go watch the models show off a vacuum cleaner or something.
Later fella's
#18
I don't think that pilots who have never flown the -700/900 should have their opinion counted as to whether we should fly both. Unless you've done it, you have nothing to base that opinion on except selfish financial or schedule motivation, and most 700 pilots will tell you they don't ever want to fly the 200 again!
How about this: get senior enough to bid it instead of trying to steal seniority/pay from the ones already on it?
How about this: get senior enough to bid it instead of trying to steal seniority/pay from the ones already on it?
#19
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
You don't have to provide a doctor's note, however, if you do it is not counted as an occurrence. You're allowed 3 sick calls a year without a doctor's note. On the 4th, you get the nastygram in your v-file, on the 5th, a carpet dance, and the 6th a termination hearing.
Your sick bank accrues 5 hrs. a month....which MUST be preserved in the JCBA.
Your sick bank accrues 5 hrs. a month....which MUST be preserved in the JCBA.
Now, you can use 300 hours in a rolling 3 year period at 100% & once you exceed that the sick time is paid out at less then 100%, but the Delta Pilot Mutual Aid makes up the difference. Also, if I call in sick for my first trip of the month & end up being sick all month that is ONE sick call. They will just mark me off as sick until I call back and tell them I'm better. Basically I have to 'call in well'.
Sorry for the hi-jack, just wanted to throw it out there. I just can't believe these Regional management jerks get away with this crap.
#20
And before you all get spooled up, I know for a fact that our MEC puts exactly zero weight on message board posts when making decisions. So the only valid place to discuss this and have your opinion counted is in the survey or directly with the reps.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post