ASA/XJT JCBA: No Dual Qual!
#21
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Captain Tony is right guys. Do the survey, talk to your Reps. Let your voices be heard.
#22
I don't think that pilots who have never flown the -700/900 should have their opinion counted as to whether we should fly both. Unless you've done it, you have nothing to base that opinion on except selfish financial or schedule motivation, and most 700 pilots will tell you they don't ever want to fly the 200 again!
How about this: get senior enough to bid it instead of trying to steal seniority/pay from the ones already on it?
How about this: get senior enough to bid it instead of trying to steal seniority/pay from the ones already on it?
The 700 is a much much better flying airplane but the 200 has much more variety due to the greater number of destinations and UAL flying. If in the JCBA contract we get a blended payrate that is higher than current 700/900 pay in return for dual qual I don't even think the senior guys will want to pass that up.
#23
here are a few things I suggested in the survey in no particular order:
1) a no furlough clause
2) no movement of off days at all
3) ready reserve reduced to 6 or 4 hours, 8 is just too long!
4) ability to use sick time as paid personal time, for example.....I would like next Thursday off so I schedule 3.75 of sick time to get the day off if staffing looks good. It then comes out of my sick bank and doesn't count against my attendance.
5) better pay
that is just a few things
1) a no furlough clause
2) no movement of off days at all
3) ready reserve reduced to 6 or 4 hours, 8 is just too long!
4) ability to use sick time as paid personal time, for example.....I would like next Thursday off so I schedule 3.75 of sick time to get the day off if staffing looks good. It then comes out of my sick bank and doesn't count against my attendance.
5) better pay
that is just a few things
#24
How about incorporating the newly proposed FAA work rules into our contract since they can't seem to get them passed?
Particularly 8 hours behind the door and limits on duty day, INCLUDING deadhead! You XJETers may not know this, but ASA has been "creatively interpreting" the regs to not apply to anything other than flight duty to the Whitlow 16 hour limit. Actual quote from Scheduling: "We can deadhead you around for two days if we want to". Welcome to the party guys.
Particularly 8 hours behind the door and limits on duty day, INCLUDING deadhead! You XJETers may not know this, but ASA has been "creatively interpreting" the regs to not apply to anything other than flight duty to the Whitlow 16 hour limit. Actual quote from Scheduling: "We can deadhead you around for two days if we want to". Welcome to the party guys.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
I've flown the 700/900 and now on the 200 making more money with increased qol due to me having better seniority of the 200.
The 700 is a much much better flying airplane but the 200 has much more variety due to the greater number of destinations and UAL flying. If in the JCBA contract we get a blended payrate that is higher than current 700/900 pay in return for dual qual I don't even think the senior guys will want to pass that up.
The 700 is a much much better flying airplane but the 200 has much more variety due to the greater number of destinations and UAL flying. If in the JCBA contract we get a blended payrate that is higher than current 700/900 pay in return for dual qual I don't even think the senior guys will want to pass that up.
Very nicely put reply!
#26
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
I don't think that pilots who have never flown the -700/900 should have their opinion counted as to whether we should fly both. Unless you've done it, you have nothing to base that opinion on except selfish financial or schedule motivation, and most 700 pilots will tell you they don't ever want to fly the 200 again!
How about this: get senior enough to bid it instead of trying to steal seniority/pay from the ones already on it?
How about this: get senior enough to bid it instead of trying to steal seniority/pay from the ones already on it?
Likely we'll fly together at some point and no doubt it'll be fun, so try not to be too offended by my internet flippancy.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
It would be nice to see incentives built into the reserve system that might entice the more senior pilots to bid reserve occasionally. I've heard that Airtran has a decent system where reserve guys can end up crediting quite a bit more on reserve than while holding a line. I'm not a fan of walking away from the seniority system, but it would be nice to provide some relief for the guys who have been stuck on reserve for 3+ years.
#30
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
The reserve rules are ridiculous... Plain and simple. Some of the guys at ASA spent zero time on reserve and never experienced what it has become. And the ones that spent some time on reserve didn't get the great experience of sitting Ready reserve 8 hours and then given a 4 day trip that starts two hours after your RR assignment should have ended... (10 hour sit) I have a feeling that the reserve rules will not be changed much in the the next contract.. I am sure we will just get a 30 year pay scale instead...
Now,it would be amusing to hear some of the senior captains deal with scheduling while on reserve. Those conversations would be comical.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



